在《总统艾滋病紧急救援计划》支持的 3 个国家开展监测和评估培训的影响

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102479
{"title":"在《总统艾滋病紧急救援计划》支持的 3 个国家开展监测和评估培训的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The second phase of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) transitioned from scaling up HIV prevention and treatment to promoting sustainability and capacity building for programs monitoring performance and evaluating key program indicators. We assessed the success of a monitoring and evaluation (M&amp;E) curriculum designed to build capacity in three PEPFAR-supported countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We customized M&amp;E trainings based on country-specific epidemic control priorities in Ethiopia, Guatemala, and Cameroon. The M&amp;E curriculum included five modules and three evaluation activities to assess impact: (i) in-person pre-post confidence assessment surveys (CAS), (ii) in-person pre-post knowledge tests (PPKT), and (iii) electronic 6–12 months post-training translating knowledge into practice (TKP) surveys. Pre- and post-training results were compared within and across countries and triangulation with the qualitative data evaluated overall success.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 188 participants attending M&amp;E trainings, 154 (82 %) responded to CAS and 165 (88 %) participants from Ethiopia and Cameroon completed PPKT. Overall CAS scores between pre- and post-test improved [Score mean difference:1.5–1.9]. PPKT indicated statistically significant knowledge gained. One out of five TKP respondents provided direct application examples from the M&amp;E training.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While feedback was predominantly positive overall, revisions were recommended for three of the five modules. Developing a customizable and adaptable M&amp;E curriculum may sustain countries’ ability to monitor their progress towards epidemic control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000818/pdfft?md5=917aa6a7c123652b45ece7302674c8b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000818-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a monitoring and evaluation training in 3 PEPFAR-supported countries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The second phase of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) transitioned from scaling up HIV prevention and treatment to promoting sustainability and capacity building for programs monitoring performance and evaluating key program indicators. We assessed the success of a monitoring and evaluation (M&amp;E) curriculum designed to build capacity in three PEPFAR-supported countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We customized M&amp;E trainings based on country-specific epidemic control priorities in Ethiopia, Guatemala, and Cameroon. The M&amp;E curriculum included five modules and three evaluation activities to assess impact: (i) in-person pre-post confidence assessment surveys (CAS), (ii) in-person pre-post knowledge tests (PPKT), and (iii) electronic 6–12 months post-training translating knowledge into practice (TKP) surveys. Pre- and post-training results were compared within and across countries and triangulation with the qualitative data evaluated overall success.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 188 participants attending M&amp;E trainings, 154 (82 %) responded to CAS and 165 (88 %) participants from Ethiopia and Cameroon completed PPKT. Overall CAS scores between pre- and post-test improved [Score mean difference:1.5–1.9]. PPKT indicated statistically significant knowledge gained. One out of five TKP respondents provided direct application examples from the M&amp;E training.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While feedback was predominantly positive overall, revisions were recommended for three of the five modules. Developing a customizable and adaptable M&amp;E curriculum may sustain countries’ ability to monitor their progress towards epidemic control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000818/pdfft?md5=917aa6a7c123652b45ece7302674c8b7&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000818-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)的第二阶段从扩大艾滋病预防和治疗规模过渡到促进可持续性和项目能力建设,以监测绩效和评估关键项目指标。我们评估了为在三个 PEPFAR 支持的国家进行能力建设而设计的监测与评估 (M&E) 课程所取得的成功。M&E 课程包括五个模块和三项评估影响的评价活动:(i) 亲临现场的事后前信心评估调查 (CAS),(ii) 亲临现场的事后前知识测试 (PPKT),(iii) 培训后 6-12 个月将知识转化为实践 (TKP) 的电子调查。对各国内部和各国之间的培训前和培训后结果进行了比较,并与定性数据进行了三角测量,以评估总体成功情况。结果在参加 M&E 培训的 188 名学员中,154 人(82%)对 CAS 作了答复,来自埃塞俄比亚和喀麦隆的 165 人(88%)完成了 PPKT。测试前后的 CAS 总分有所提高[平均分差:1.5-1.9]。PPKT表明,从统计学角度看,参与者获得了大量知识。五名 TKP 答卷人中有一人提供了直接应用 M&E 培训的实例。开发可定制和适应性强的 M&E 课程可保持各国监测疫情控制进展的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a monitoring and evaluation training in 3 PEPFAR-supported countries

Background

The second phase of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) transitioned from scaling up HIV prevention and treatment to promoting sustainability and capacity building for programs monitoring performance and evaluating key program indicators. We assessed the success of a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) curriculum designed to build capacity in three PEPFAR-supported countries.

Methods

We customized M&E trainings based on country-specific epidemic control priorities in Ethiopia, Guatemala, and Cameroon. The M&E curriculum included five modules and three evaluation activities to assess impact: (i) in-person pre-post confidence assessment surveys (CAS), (ii) in-person pre-post knowledge tests (PPKT), and (iii) electronic 6–12 months post-training translating knowledge into practice (TKP) surveys. Pre- and post-training results were compared within and across countries and triangulation with the qualitative data evaluated overall success.

Results

Among 188 participants attending M&E trainings, 154 (82 %) responded to CAS and 165 (88 %) participants from Ethiopia and Cameroon completed PPKT. Overall CAS scores between pre- and post-test improved [Score mean difference:1.5–1.9]. PPKT indicated statistically significant knowledge gained. One out of five TKP respondents provided direct application examples from the M&E training.

Conclusion

While feedback was predominantly positive overall, revisions were recommended for three of the five modules. Developing a customizable and adaptable M&E curriculum may sustain countries’ ability to monitor their progress towards epidemic control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory evaluation. How to incorporate an anticipatory technique into a theory-driven evaluation process. Results of application in a case study. What evaluation criteria are used in policy evaluation research: A cross-field literature review A program evaluation of the new choices workforce development program: An appreciative inquiry approach The Problems (and possible solutions) of assessing risk, race and recidivism in long operating drug treatment courts A theoretical framework to companies value creation through a systematic review of intangibles’ management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1