司机为何抵制使用部分自动化功能?从心理反应理论的角度看问题

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.007
Yiran Zhang, Heming Gong, Chundong Zheng
{"title":"司机为何抵制使用部分自动化功能?从心理反应理论的角度看问题","authors":"Yiran Zhang,&nbsp;Heming Gong,&nbsp;Chundong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autonomous vehicles equipped with automation driving assistance features are attracting significant public attention for their safety, innovation, and efficiency. While existing research has explored how individuals’ cognition of autonomous vehicles influences their acceptance or adoption intention, there is limited understanding of drivers’ post-purchase usage behavior, particularly their resistance to using automation features. Taking the lens of psychological reactance theory, this research investigates the impact of driver type and car class on resistance to using automation features. We conducted a survey (N=391) and found that drivers with limited experience exhibit higher resistance to using these features compared to experienced drivers. This effect is mediated by the perceived threat to driving freedom and is moderated by car class. Specifically, this effect only holds for economy cars but not high-end cars. Our findings can help managers develop personalized recommendations for consumers regarding autonomous vehicles, and provide a reference for designing driver assistance systems tailored to car class.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 383-394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do drivers resist the use of partial automation features? A perspective from psychological reactance theory\",\"authors\":\"Yiran Zhang,&nbsp;Heming Gong,&nbsp;Chundong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Autonomous vehicles equipped with automation driving assistance features are attracting significant public attention for their safety, innovation, and efficiency. While existing research has explored how individuals’ cognition of autonomous vehicles influences their acceptance or adoption intention, there is limited understanding of drivers’ post-purchase usage behavior, particularly their resistance to using automation features. Taking the lens of psychological reactance theory, this research investigates the impact of driver type and car class on resistance to using automation features. We conducted a survey (N=391) and found that drivers with limited experience exhibit higher resistance to using these features compared to experienced drivers. This effect is mediated by the perceived threat to driving freedom and is moderated by car class. Specifically, this effect only holds for economy cars but not high-end cars. Our findings can help managers develop personalized recommendations for consumers regarding autonomous vehicles, and provide a reference for designing driver assistance systems tailored to car class.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 383-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002584\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

配备自动驾驶辅助功能的自动驾驶汽车因其安全性、创新性和高效性而备受公众关注。虽然现有研究探讨了个人对自动驾驶汽车的认知如何影响其接受或采用意向,但对驾驶员购买后的使用行为,尤其是他们对使用自动驾驶功能的抵触情绪了解有限。本研究以心理反应理论为视角,探讨了驾驶员类型和汽车级别对抵制使用自动驾驶功能的影响。我们进行了一项调查(N=391),发现与经验丰富的司机相比,经验有限的司机对使用这些功能表现出更大的抵触情绪。这种效应受驾驶自由感知威胁的影响,并受汽车级别的调节。具体来说,这种效应只对经济型汽车有效,而对高端汽车无效。我们的研究结果可以帮助管理者为消费者开发有关自动驾驶汽车的个性化建议,并为设计针对汽车级别的驾驶辅助系统提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do drivers resist the use of partial automation features? A perspective from psychological reactance theory

Autonomous vehicles equipped with automation driving assistance features are attracting significant public attention for their safety, innovation, and efficiency. While existing research has explored how individuals’ cognition of autonomous vehicles influences their acceptance or adoption intention, there is limited understanding of drivers’ post-purchase usage behavior, particularly their resistance to using automation features. Taking the lens of psychological reactance theory, this research investigates the impact of driver type and car class on resistance to using automation features. We conducted a survey (N=391) and found that drivers with limited experience exhibit higher resistance to using these features compared to experienced drivers. This effect is mediated by the perceived threat to driving freedom and is moderated by car class. Specifically, this effect only holds for economy cars but not high-end cars. Our findings can help managers develop personalized recommendations for consumers regarding autonomous vehicles, and provide a reference for designing driver assistance systems tailored to car class.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1