通勤对心理健康的影响:使用有时间戳的主观和客观数据

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.009
Xuenuo Zhang, Liang Ma
{"title":"通勤对心理健康的影响:使用有时间戳的主观和客观数据","authors":"Xuenuo Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous studies exploring the link between daily commuting and mental well-being have primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and self-reported surveys. These methods often limit causal inference and are prone to recall bias. This study adopts a novel approach by utilizing time-stamped stress level data (objective) and experience sampling of moods (subjective) to assess the varied stress responses triggered by daily commuting. Our aim is to reexamine the effects of daily commuting on mental well-being, with a particular focus on evaluating how subjective (self-reported moods) and objective (biosignal data) measurement techniques capture these psychological and physiological responses differently. We involved 203 employees from Beijing, who wore portable smartwatches over a week. Throughout five working days, we conducted three random experience sampling surveys daily to collect real-time mood data. Initial analysis visualized the relationships between stress levels, moods, and commuting characteristics such as duration, mode, and timing. Subsequent analysis using mixed-effects models quantified the impacts of these commuting attributes on stress and mood. Our findings reveal that commute duration and mode significantly affect both mood and stress during commuting. Specifically, longer commutes are associated with poorer moods but surprisingly, lower stress levels. Regarding commuting modes, taking the bus and bicycling were found to enhance moods relative to traveling by car. Conversely, walking and cycling appeared to elevate stress levels the most, while shuttle bus use correlated with the lowest stress levels. Our study also highlights a discrepancy between physiological stress, as measured by biosignal technology, and psychological stress, as reported in surveys. This discrepancy underscores the complexities of measuring mental well-being and enriches the ongoing discussion about the intricate relationship between daily commuting and mental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 395-412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of commuting on mental well-being: Using time-stamped subjective and objective data\",\"authors\":\"Xuenuo Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Numerous studies exploring the link between daily commuting and mental well-being have primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and self-reported surveys. These methods often limit causal inference and are prone to recall bias. This study adopts a novel approach by utilizing time-stamped stress level data (objective) and experience sampling of moods (subjective) to assess the varied stress responses triggered by daily commuting. Our aim is to reexamine the effects of daily commuting on mental well-being, with a particular focus on evaluating how subjective (self-reported moods) and objective (biosignal data) measurement techniques capture these psychological and physiological responses differently. We involved 203 employees from Beijing, who wore portable smartwatches over a week. Throughout five working days, we conducted three random experience sampling surveys daily to collect real-time mood data. Initial analysis visualized the relationships between stress levels, moods, and commuting characteristics such as duration, mode, and timing. Subsequent analysis using mixed-effects models quantified the impacts of these commuting attributes on stress and mood. Our findings reveal that commute duration and mode significantly affect both mood and stress during commuting. Specifically, longer commutes are associated with poorer moods but surprisingly, lower stress levels. Regarding commuting modes, taking the bus and bicycling were found to enhance moods relative to traveling by car. Conversely, walking and cycling appeared to elevate stress levels the most, while shuttle bus use correlated with the lowest stress levels. Our study also highlights a discrepancy between physiological stress, as measured by biosignal technology, and psychological stress, as reported in surveys. This discrepancy underscores the complexities of measuring mental well-being and enriches the ongoing discussion about the intricate relationship between daily commuting and mental health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 395-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002602\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多探讨日常通勤与心理健康之间联系的研究主要依赖于横断面设计和自我报告调查。这些方法往往限制了因果推断,而且容易产生回忆偏差。本研究采用了一种新颖的方法,利用时间戳压力水平数据(客观)和情绪体验采样(主观)来评估日常通勤引发的各种压力反应。我们的目的是重新审视日常通勤对心理健康的影响,尤其侧重于评估主观(自我报告的情绪)和客观(生物信号数据)测量技术如何以不同方式捕捉这些心理和生理反应。我们让来自北京的 203 名员工在一周内佩戴便携式智能手表。在五个工作日内,我们每天进行三次随机体验抽样调查,以收集实时情绪数据。初步分析可视化压力水平、情绪和通勤特征(如持续时间、模式和时间)之间的关系。随后使用混合效应模型对这些通勤属性对压力和情绪的影响进行了量化分析。我们的研究结果表明,通勤时间和通勤方式对通勤期间的情绪和压力都有显著影响。具体来说,通勤时间越长,情绪越差,但令人惊讶的是,压力水平却越低。在通勤方式方面,乘坐公交车和骑自行车比开车更能改善情绪。相反,步行和骑自行车似乎最能提升压力水平,而乘坐班车的压力水平最低。我们的研究还强调了生物信号技术测量的生理压力与调查报告的心理压力之间的差异。这种差异凸显了测量心理健康的复杂性,并丰富了目前关于日常通勤与心理健康之间错综复杂关系的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of commuting on mental well-being: Using time-stamped subjective and objective data

Numerous studies exploring the link between daily commuting and mental well-being have primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and self-reported surveys. These methods often limit causal inference and are prone to recall bias. This study adopts a novel approach by utilizing time-stamped stress level data (objective) and experience sampling of moods (subjective) to assess the varied stress responses triggered by daily commuting. Our aim is to reexamine the effects of daily commuting on mental well-being, with a particular focus on evaluating how subjective (self-reported moods) and objective (biosignal data) measurement techniques capture these psychological and physiological responses differently. We involved 203 employees from Beijing, who wore portable smartwatches over a week. Throughout five working days, we conducted three random experience sampling surveys daily to collect real-time mood data. Initial analysis visualized the relationships between stress levels, moods, and commuting characteristics such as duration, mode, and timing. Subsequent analysis using mixed-effects models quantified the impacts of these commuting attributes on stress and mood. Our findings reveal that commute duration and mode significantly affect both mood and stress during commuting. Specifically, longer commutes are associated with poorer moods but surprisingly, lower stress levels. Regarding commuting modes, taking the bus and bicycling were found to enhance moods relative to traveling by car. Conversely, walking and cycling appeared to elevate stress levels the most, while shuttle bus use correlated with the lowest stress levels. Our study also highlights a discrepancy between physiological stress, as measured by biosignal technology, and psychological stress, as reported in surveys. This discrepancy underscores the complexities of measuring mental well-being and enriches the ongoing discussion about the intricate relationship between daily commuting and mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1