数字行为改变干预(HeartSteps II)的参与建模:探索性系统识别方法

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104721
Steven A. De La Torre , Mohamed El Mistiri , Eric Hekler , Predrag Klasnja , Benjamin Marlin , Misha Pavel , Donna Spruijt-Metz , Daniel E. Rivera
{"title":"数字行为改变干预(HeartSteps II)的参与建模:探索性系统识别方法","authors":"Steven A. De La Torre ,&nbsp;Mohamed El Mistiri ,&nbsp;Eric Hekler ,&nbsp;Predrag Klasnja ,&nbsp;Benjamin Marlin ,&nbsp;Misha Pavel ,&nbsp;Donna Spruijt-Metz ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) are feasibly effective tools for addressing physical activity. However, in-depth understanding of participants’ long-term engagement with DBCIs remains sparse. Since the effectiveness of DBCIs to impact behavior change depends, in part, upon participant engagement, there is a need to better understand engagement as a dynamic process in response to an individual’s ever-changing biological, psychological, social, and environmental context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The year-long micro-randomized trial (MRT) <em>HeartSteps II</em> provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate DBCI engagement among ethnically diverse participants. We combined data streams from wearable sensors (Fitbit Versa, i.e., walking behavior), the <em>HeartSteps II</em> app (i.e. page views), and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs, i.e. perceived intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) to build the idiographic models. A system identification approach and a fluid analogy model were used to conduct autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) analyses that tested hypothesized relationships between these variables inspired by Self-Determination Theory (SDT) with DBCI engagement through time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 11 <em>HeartSteps II</em> participants was used to test aspects of the hypothesized SDT dynamic model. The average age was 46.33 (SD=7.4) years, and the average steps per day at baseline was 5,507 steps (SD=6,239). The hypothesized 5-input SDT-inspired ARX model for app engagement resulted in a 31.75 % weighted RMSEA (31.50 % on validation and 31.91 % on estimation), indicating that the model predicted app page views almost 32 % better relative to the mean of the data. Among Hispanic/Latino participants, the average overall model fit across inventories of the SDT fluid analogy was 34.22 % (SD=10.53) compared to 22.39 % (SD=6.36) among non-Hispanic/Latino Whites, a difference of 11.83 %. Across individuals, the number of daily notification prompts received by the participant was positively associated with increased app page views. The weekend/weekday indicator and perceived daily busyness were also found to be key predictors of the number of daily application page views.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This novel approach has significant implications for both personalized and adaptive DBCIs by identifying factors that foster or undermine engagement in an individual’s respective context. Once identified, these factors can be tailored to promote engagement and support sustained behavior change over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001394/pdfft?md5=4f63dda9bba243570e4ff38291614e5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1532046424001394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling engagement with a digital behavior change intervention (HeartSteps II): An exploratory system identification approach\",\"authors\":\"Steven A. De La Torre ,&nbsp;Mohamed El Mistiri ,&nbsp;Eric Hekler ,&nbsp;Predrag Klasnja ,&nbsp;Benjamin Marlin ,&nbsp;Misha Pavel ,&nbsp;Donna Spruijt-Metz ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) are feasibly effective tools for addressing physical activity. However, in-depth understanding of participants’ long-term engagement with DBCIs remains sparse. Since the effectiveness of DBCIs to impact behavior change depends, in part, upon participant engagement, there is a need to better understand engagement as a dynamic process in response to an individual’s ever-changing biological, psychological, social, and environmental context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The year-long micro-randomized trial (MRT) <em>HeartSteps II</em> provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate DBCI engagement among ethnically diverse participants. We combined data streams from wearable sensors (Fitbit Versa, i.e., walking behavior), the <em>HeartSteps II</em> app (i.e. page views), and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs, i.e. perceived intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) to build the idiographic models. A system identification approach and a fluid analogy model were used to conduct autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) analyses that tested hypothesized relationships between these variables inspired by Self-Determination Theory (SDT) with DBCI engagement through time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 11 <em>HeartSteps II</em> participants was used to test aspects of the hypothesized SDT dynamic model. The average age was 46.33 (SD=7.4) years, and the average steps per day at baseline was 5,507 steps (SD=6,239). The hypothesized 5-input SDT-inspired ARX model for app engagement resulted in a 31.75 % weighted RMSEA (31.50 % on validation and 31.91 % on estimation), indicating that the model predicted app page views almost 32 % better relative to the mean of the data. Among Hispanic/Latino participants, the average overall model fit across inventories of the SDT fluid analogy was 34.22 % (SD=10.53) compared to 22.39 % (SD=6.36) among non-Hispanic/Latino Whites, a difference of 11.83 %. Across individuals, the number of daily notification prompts received by the participant was positively associated with increased app page views. The weekend/weekday indicator and perceived daily busyness were also found to be key predictors of the number of daily application page views.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This novel approach has significant implications for both personalized and adaptive DBCIs by identifying factors that foster or undermine engagement in an individual’s respective context. Once identified, these factors can be tailored to promote engagement and support sustained behavior change over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001394/pdfft?md5=4f63dda9bba243570e4ff38291614e5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1532046424001394-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001394\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标数字行为改变干预(DBCIs)是解决体育锻炼问题的可行有效工具。然而,对参与者长期参与 DBCI 的深入了解仍然很少。由于 DBCI 影响行为改变的效果部分取决于参与者的参与度,因此有必要更好地了解参与度是一个动态的过程,它与个体不断变化的生理、心理、社会和环境背景相适应。方法为期一年的微型随机试验(MRT)HeartSteps II 为研究不同种族参与者的 DBCI 参与度提供了前所未有的机会。我们将来自可穿戴传感器(Fitbit Versa,即步行行为)、HeartSteps II 应用程序(即页面浏览量)和生态瞬间评估(EMA,即感知内在和外在动机)的数据流结合起来,建立了成因模型。我们使用系统识别方法和流体类比模型来进行自回归与外生输入(ARX)分析,以检验受自我决定理论(SDT)启发的这些变量与 DBCI 参与时间之间的假设关系。他们的平均年龄为 46.33 岁(SD=7.4),基线时的平均每天步数为 5,507 步(SD=6,239)。假设的 5 输入 SDT-inspired ARX 模型对应用程序参与度的加权均方根误差为 31.75%(验证为 31.50%,估计为 31.91%),表明该模型对应用程序页面浏览量的预测比数据平均值高出近 32%。在西班牙裔/拉美裔参与者中,流体类比 SDT 库存的平均总体模型拟合度为 34.22 %(SD=10.53),而在非西班牙裔/拉美裔白人中为 22.39 %(SD=6.36),相差 11.83 %。在所有个体中,参与者每天收到的通知提示数量与应用程序页面浏览量的增加呈正相关。周末/周日指标和感知到的日常忙碌程度也是预测每日应用页面浏览量的关键因素。 结论这种新方法通过识别促进或削弱个人参与度的因素,对个性化和适应性 DBCI 有着重要意义。一旦确定了这些因素,就可以对其进行定制,以促进参与并支持长期的持续行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling engagement with a digital behavior change intervention (HeartSteps II): An exploratory system identification approach

Objective

Digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) are feasibly effective tools for addressing physical activity. However, in-depth understanding of participants’ long-term engagement with DBCIs remains sparse. Since the effectiveness of DBCIs to impact behavior change depends, in part, upon participant engagement, there is a need to better understand engagement as a dynamic process in response to an individual’s ever-changing biological, psychological, social, and environmental context.

Methods

The year-long micro-randomized trial (MRT) HeartSteps II provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate DBCI engagement among ethnically diverse participants. We combined data streams from wearable sensors (Fitbit Versa, i.e., walking behavior), the HeartSteps II app (i.e. page views), and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs, i.e. perceived intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) to build the idiographic models. A system identification approach and a fluid analogy model were used to conduct autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) analyses that tested hypothesized relationships between these variables inspired by Self-Determination Theory (SDT) with DBCI engagement through time.

Results

Data from 11 HeartSteps II participants was used to test aspects of the hypothesized SDT dynamic model. The average age was 46.33 (SD=7.4) years, and the average steps per day at baseline was 5,507 steps (SD=6,239). The hypothesized 5-input SDT-inspired ARX model for app engagement resulted in a 31.75 % weighted RMSEA (31.50 % on validation and 31.91 % on estimation), indicating that the model predicted app page views almost 32 % better relative to the mean of the data. Among Hispanic/Latino participants, the average overall model fit across inventories of the SDT fluid analogy was 34.22 % (SD=10.53) compared to 22.39 % (SD=6.36) among non-Hispanic/Latino Whites, a difference of 11.83 %. Across individuals, the number of daily notification prompts received by the participant was positively associated with increased app page views. The weekend/weekday indicator and perceived daily busyness were also found to be key predictors of the number of daily application page views.

Conclusions

This novel approach has significant implications for both personalized and adaptive DBCIs by identifying factors that foster or undermine engagement in an individual’s respective context. Once identified, these factors can be tailored to promote engagement and support sustained behavior change over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Early multi-cancer detection through deep learning: An anomaly detection approach using Variational Autoencoder. Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data. Cross-Modal self-supervised vision language pre-training with multiple objectives for medical visual question answering Machine learning approaches for the discovery of clinical pathways from patient data: A systematic review MultiADE: A Multi-domain benchmark for Adverse Drug Event extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1