{"title":"应用于 Y-STR 图谱的贡献者估计方法数量的不确定性","authors":"Shota Inokuchi , Hiroaki Nakanishi , Aya Takada , Kazuyuki Saito","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maximum allele count (MAC) and total allele count (TAC) methods are widely used for estimating the number of contributors (NoC) of autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) profile in many forensic laboratories. In this study, we applied NoC estimation methods to mixed Y-STR profiles and evaluated its uncertainty and performance. For the MAC method, as recent Y-STR typing kits involve single- and multi-copy loci, we defined “MAC-single” for use across only single-copy loci and “MAC-multi” for use across only multi-copy loci. We generated a dataset containing 120,000 Y-STR profiles for a one to six-person mixture in silico based on previously reported haplotype frequencies of 27 Y-STR loci in Yfiler Plus for the U.S. population (reported by NIST) and the Henan Han population. The dataset was randomly split into a training set and a test set. The training set was used to construct a TAC distribution (TAC curve), whereas the test set was used to calculate the performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score). In addition, the effect of the upper limit of NoC considered for estimation on overall accuracy was evaluated. The overall accuracies of MAC-single, MAC-multi, and TAC methods when the upper limit of NoC was set to six-person were 0.7920, 0.4329, and 0.7877 for the U.S. population and 0.8207, 0.4609, and 0.8385 for the Henan Han population. Our results suggest that the MAC-single and TAC methods can estimate the NoC for mixed Y-STR profiles with high levels of accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty in the number of contributor estimation methods applied to a Y-STR profile\",\"authors\":\"Shota Inokuchi , Hiroaki Nakanishi , Aya Takada , Kazuyuki Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Maximum allele count (MAC) and total allele count (TAC) methods are widely used for estimating the number of contributors (NoC) of autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) profile in many forensic laboratories. In this study, we applied NoC estimation methods to mixed Y-STR profiles and evaluated its uncertainty and performance. For the MAC method, as recent Y-STR typing kits involve single- and multi-copy loci, we defined “MAC-single” for use across only single-copy loci and “MAC-multi” for use across only multi-copy loci. We generated a dataset containing 120,000 Y-STR profiles for a one to six-person mixture in silico based on previously reported haplotype frequencies of 27 Y-STR loci in Yfiler Plus for the U.S. population (reported by NIST) and the Henan Han population. The dataset was randomly split into a training set and a test set. The training set was used to construct a TAC distribution (TAC curve), whereas the test set was used to calculate the performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score). In addition, the effect of the upper limit of NoC considered for estimation on overall accuracy was evaluated. The overall accuracies of MAC-single, MAC-multi, and TAC methods when the upper limit of NoC was set to six-person were 0.7920, 0.4329, and 0.7877 for the U.S. population and 0.8207, 0.4609, and 0.8385 for the Henan Han population. Our results suggest that the MAC-single and TAC methods can estimate the NoC for mixed Y-STR profiles with high levels of accuracy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncertainty in the number of contributor estimation methods applied to a Y-STR profile
Maximum allele count (MAC) and total allele count (TAC) methods are widely used for estimating the number of contributors (NoC) of autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) profile in many forensic laboratories. In this study, we applied NoC estimation methods to mixed Y-STR profiles and evaluated its uncertainty and performance. For the MAC method, as recent Y-STR typing kits involve single- and multi-copy loci, we defined “MAC-single” for use across only single-copy loci and “MAC-multi” for use across only multi-copy loci. We generated a dataset containing 120,000 Y-STR profiles for a one to six-person mixture in silico based on previously reported haplotype frequencies of 27 Y-STR loci in Yfiler Plus for the U.S. population (reported by NIST) and the Henan Han population. The dataset was randomly split into a training set and a test set. The training set was used to construct a TAC distribution (TAC curve), whereas the test set was used to calculate the performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score). In addition, the effect of the upper limit of NoC considered for estimation on overall accuracy was evaluated. The overall accuracies of MAC-single, MAC-multi, and TAC methods when the upper limit of NoC was set to six-person were 0.7920, 0.4329, and 0.7877 for the U.S. population and 0.8207, 0.4609, and 0.8385 for the Henan Han population. Our results suggest that the MAC-single and TAC methods can estimate the NoC for mixed Y-STR profiles with high levels of accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.