揭示西澳大利亚州经历过护理的年轻人的社会和健康现实:人口研究

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107053
Lauren Parsons , Reinie Cordier , Fadzai Chikwava , Melissa O'Donnell , Donna Chung , Anna Ferrante , Philip Mendes , Stian Thoresen
{"title":"揭示西澳大利亚州经历过护理的年轻人的社会和健康现实:人口研究","authors":"Lauren Parsons ,&nbsp;Reinie Cordier ,&nbsp;Fadzai Chikwava ,&nbsp;Melissa O'Donnell ,&nbsp;Donna Chung ,&nbsp;Anna Ferrante ,&nbsp;Philip Mendes ,&nbsp;Stian Thoresen","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Young people who were in out-of-home care (OHC) face an accelerated transition to independent adulthood. Current evidence on outcomes for Australian care-leavers is scant.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to develop a better understanding of the outcomes for young people leaving care.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>A birth cohort of children and young people born in Western Australia (WA) from 1993 to 2008. Three groups were identified and compared: young people with care-experience (OHC Cohort), those with child protection involvement but not care experience (CP Contact Cohort), and peers in the general population (No Contact Cohort).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, population-based study utilising de-identified, linked administrative records provided by the WA state government agencies. Data from the three cohorts were compared through descriptive statistics, independent samples <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression modelling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The birth cohort contained records for 414,266 individuals. The smallest comparison group in this study was the OHC Cohort (<em>n</em> = 6526), followed by the CP Contact Cohort (<em>n</em> = 78,095), and the No Contact Cohort (<em>n</em> = 329,645). Care-experienced young people in WA fared significantly worse than their peers across the domains of health (physical and mental), disability, education, social housing and criminal justice involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Those who have had child protection involvement, but have not been placed in care, had better outcomes than those who had been in care. However, their outcomes were still poorer than the population cohort with no child protection contact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 107053"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004435/pdfft?md5=8895e3da7f9e621f384efc80e9f127fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0145213424004435-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding light on the social and health realities of care-experienced young people in Western Australia: A population-level study\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Parsons ,&nbsp;Reinie Cordier ,&nbsp;Fadzai Chikwava ,&nbsp;Melissa O'Donnell ,&nbsp;Donna Chung ,&nbsp;Anna Ferrante ,&nbsp;Philip Mendes ,&nbsp;Stian Thoresen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Young people who were in out-of-home care (OHC) face an accelerated transition to independent adulthood. Current evidence on outcomes for Australian care-leavers is scant.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to develop a better understanding of the outcomes for young people leaving care.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>A birth cohort of children and young people born in Western Australia (WA) from 1993 to 2008. Three groups were identified and compared: young people with care-experience (OHC Cohort), those with child protection involvement but not care experience (CP Contact Cohort), and peers in the general population (No Contact Cohort).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, population-based study utilising de-identified, linked administrative records provided by the WA state government agencies. Data from the three cohorts were compared through descriptive statistics, independent samples <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression modelling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The birth cohort contained records for 414,266 individuals. The smallest comparison group in this study was the OHC Cohort (<em>n</em> = 6526), followed by the CP Contact Cohort (<em>n</em> = 78,095), and the No Contact Cohort (<em>n</em> = 329,645). Care-experienced young people in WA fared significantly worse than their peers across the domains of health (physical and mental), disability, education, social housing and criminal justice involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Those who have had child protection involvement, but have not been placed in care, had better outcomes than those who had been in care. However, their outcomes were still poorer than the population cohort with no child protection contact.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004435/pdfft?md5=8895e3da7f9e621f384efc80e9f127fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0145213424004435-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景曾接受家庭外照料(OHC)的青少年面临着加速向独立成人过渡的问题。本研究旨在更好地了解脱离照料的青少年的结果。参与者和背景1993年至2008年期间,西澳大利亚州(WA)出生的儿童和青少年组成了一个出生队列。我们确定了三个群体并进行了比较:有照料经历的青少年(OHC 群体)、有儿童保护参与但无照料经历的青少年(CP 接触群体)以及普通人群中的同龄人(无接触群体)。方法这是一项基于人群的回顾性研究,利用了西澳大利亚州政府机构提供的去标识化、关联行政记录。通过描述性统计、独立样本 t 检验和逻辑回归模型对三个队列的数据进行了比较。在本研究中,最小的比较组是 "有照料经历队列"(n = 6526),其次是 "有照料经历队列"(n = 78095)和 "无照料经历队列"(n = 329645)。在健康(身体和精神)、残疾、教育、社会住房和刑事司法介入等领域,西澳大利亚州有过照料经历的青少年的表现明显差于其同龄人。但是,他们的结果仍然比没有接触过儿童保护的人群要差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shedding light on the social and health realities of care-experienced young people in Western Australia: A population-level study

Background

Young people who were in out-of-home care (OHC) face an accelerated transition to independent adulthood. Current evidence on outcomes for Australian care-leavers is scant.

Objective

This study aims to develop a better understanding of the outcomes for young people leaving care.

Participants and setting

A birth cohort of children and young people born in Western Australia (WA) from 1993 to 2008. Three groups were identified and compared: young people with care-experience (OHC Cohort), those with child protection involvement but not care experience (CP Contact Cohort), and peers in the general population (No Contact Cohort).

Methods

This is a retrospective, population-based study utilising de-identified, linked administrative records provided by the WA state government agencies. Data from the three cohorts were compared through descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and logistic regression modelling.

Results

The birth cohort contained records for 414,266 individuals. The smallest comparison group in this study was the OHC Cohort (n = 6526), followed by the CP Contact Cohort (n = 78,095), and the No Contact Cohort (n = 329,645). Care-experienced young people in WA fared significantly worse than their peers across the domains of health (physical and mental), disability, education, social housing and criminal justice involvement.

Conclusions

Those who have had child protection involvement, but have not been placed in care, had better outcomes than those who had been in care. However, their outcomes were still poorer than the population cohort with no child protection contact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Victimization, immigration status, and psychosocial well-being: A representative study among finnish adolescents. Childhood maltreatment profiles and their associations with trajectories of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in Chinese early adolescents. Factors associated with decisions to refer possible abusive head trauma to a hospital-based child protection team in Aotearoa New Zealand Predictors of mental health during young people's transition from out-of-home care in Austria The risk and protective factors, response to disclosure, and interventions for sibling sexual abuse: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1