临床医生推荐常见降胆固醇膳食补充剂指南

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1
James M. Backes, Daniel E. Hilleman
{"title":"临床医生推荐常见降胆固醇膳食补充剂指南","authors":"James M. Backes,&nbsp;Daniel E. Hilleman","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The US dietary supplement (DS) market has expanded exponentially since 1994, with an estimated 50,000–80,000 individual products currently available. Many DS claim cholesterol or cardiovascular benefits. Overall, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with DS are lacking, while studies with favorable results are commonly performed outside of the USA, resulting in inconsistent findings. The expansion of the DS market has limited the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and prevent substandard products. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are components of DS fish oil. Recent RCTs utilizing prescription fish oil have provided mixed findings and small but significant safety concerns. Hence, the role of DS fish oil is limited and no longer recommended by major cardiovascular guidelines. Concerns have also been observed from RCTs utilizing prescription niacin, resulting in a negligible role for DS niacin in lipid management. Red yeast rice has demonstrated significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in studies performed worldwide, including the USA. However, quality concerns and inconsistent study results have been reported on multiple occasions. Other common DS have produced modest reductions in LDL-C and may provide other cardiometabolic benefits, including garlic, phytosterols, psyllium, and berberine. Yet inconsistent study results and quality concerns continue to be reported for most. Nonetheless, there is a need for alternative therapies that can safely and effectively reduce cardiovascular risk. However, until DS routinely match label claims and are free of contaminants, the agents have a limited role in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 6","pages":"719 - 728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clinicians Guide to Recommending Common Cholesterol-Lowering Dietary Supplements\",\"authors\":\"James M. Backes,&nbsp;Daniel E. Hilleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The US dietary supplement (DS) market has expanded exponentially since 1994, with an estimated 50,000–80,000 individual products currently available. Many DS claim cholesterol or cardiovascular benefits. Overall, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with DS are lacking, while studies with favorable results are commonly performed outside of the USA, resulting in inconsistent findings. The expansion of the DS market has limited the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and prevent substandard products. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are components of DS fish oil. Recent RCTs utilizing prescription fish oil have provided mixed findings and small but significant safety concerns. Hence, the role of DS fish oil is limited and no longer recommended by major cardiovascular guidelines. Concerns have also been observed from RCTs utilizing prescription niacin, resulting in a negligible role for DS niacin in lipid management. Red yeast rice has demonstrated significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in studies performed worldwide, including the USA. However, quality concerns and inconsistent study results have been reported on multiple occasions. Other common DS have produced modest reductions in LDL-C and may provide other cardiometabolic benefits, including garlic, phytosterols, psyllium, and berberine. Yet inconsistent study results and quality concerns continue to be reported for most. Nonetheless, there is a need for alternative therapies that can safely and effectively reduce cardiovascular risk. However, until DS routinely match label claims and are free of contaminants, the agents have a limited role in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"719 - 728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 1994 年以来,美国膳食补充剂(DS)市场急剧扩大,目前估计有 50,000 至 80,000 种产品。许多膳食补充剂声称对胆固醇或心血管有益。总体而言,缺乏针对 DS 的设计良好的随机对照试验(RCT),而结果良好的研究通常是在美国以外进行的,导致研究结果不一致。DS市场的扩大限制了食品药品管理局监管和防止不合格产品的能力。二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸是DS鱼油的成分。最近利用处方鱼油进行的 RCT 研究结果参差不齐,安全问题虽小但很重要。因此,DS 鱼油的作用有限,主要的心血管指南也不再推荐使用。利用处方烟酸进行的 RCT 研究也发现了令人担忧的问题,因此 DS 烟酸在血脂管理中的作用微乎其微。在包括美国在内的全球研究中,红麴已证明可显著降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。不过,也有多次报告称,红酵母米存在质量问题,且研究结果不一致。大蒜、植物甾醇、洋车前子和小檗碱等其他常见 DS 也能适度降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇,并可能带来其他心脏代谢方面的益处。然而,大多数药物的研究结果并不一致,质量也令人担忧。尽管如此,我们仍然需要能够安全有效地降低心血管风险的替代疗法。然而,在 DS 常规符合标签声明且不含污染物之前,这些制剂在临床实践中的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Clinicians Guide to Recommending Common Cholesterol-Lowering Dietary Supplements

The US dietary supplement (DS) market has expanded exponentially since 1994, with an estimated 50,000–80,000 individual products currently available. Many DS claim cholesterol or cardiovascular benefits. Overall, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with DS are lacking, while studies with favorable results are commonly performed outside of the USA, resulting in inconsistent findings. The expansion of the DS market has limited the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and prevent substandard products. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are components of DS fish oil. Recent RCTs utilizing prescription fish oil have provided mixed findings and small but significant safety concerns. Hence, the role of DS fish oil is limited and no longer recommended by major cardiovascular guidelines. Concerns have also been observed from RCTs utilizing prescription niacin, resulting in a negligible role for DS niacin in lipid management. Red yeast rice has demonstrated significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in studies performed worldwide, including the USA. However, quality concerns and inconsistent study results have been reported on multiple occasions. Other common DS have produced modest reductions in LDL-C and may provide other cardiometabolic benefits, including garlic, phytosterols, psyllium, and berberine. Yet inconsistent study results and quality concerns continue to be reported for most. Nonetheless, there is a need for alternative therapies that can safely and effectively reduce cardiovascular risk. However, until DS routinely match label claims and are free of contaminants, the agents have a limited role in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acknowledgement to Referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1