Yanjie Hao, Dylan Hansen, Worawit Louthrenoo, Yi-Hsing Chen, Jiacai Cho, Aisha Lateef, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Shue-Fen Luo, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu, Sandra Navarra, Leonid Zamora, Zhanguo Li, Sargunan Sockalingam, Yasuhiro Katsumata, Masayoshi Harigai, Zhuoli Zhang, Madelynn Chan, Jun Kikuchi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Sang-Cheol Bae, Fiona Goldblatt, Sean O’Neill, Kristine Ng, B M D B Basnayake, Nicola Tugnet, Yoshiya Tanaka, Chak Sing Lau, Ning Li, Vera Golder, Alberta Hoi, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Eric Morand, Shereen Oon, Mandana Nikpour
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮患者低疾病活动状态不同子集的特征和结果","authors":"Yanjie Hao, Dylan Hansen, Worawit Louthrenoo, Yi-Hsing Chen, Jiacai Cho, Aisha Lateef, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Shue-Fen Luo, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu, Sandra Navarra, Leonid Zamora, Zhanguo Li, Sargunan Sockalingam, Yasuhiro Katsumata, Masayoshi Harigai, Zhuoli Zhang, Madelynn Chan, Jun Kikuchi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Sang-Cheol Bae, Fiona Goldblatt, Sean O’Neill, Kristine Ng, B M D B Basnayake, Nicola Tugnet, Yoshiya Tanaka, Chak Sing Lau, Ning Li, Vera Golder, Alberta Hoi, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Eric Morand, Shereen Oon, Mandana Nikpour","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who achieved LLDAS with clinical activity, serological activity only or neither clinical nor serological activity. Methods Patients with SLE enrolled in a prospective multinational cohort from March 2013 to December 2020 who were in LLDAS at least once were included. Visits that fulfilled both LLDAS and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria were excluded. Results 2099 patients were included, with median follow-up of 3.5 (IQR 1.3–5.8) years. At 6150 visits, patients were in LLDAS but not DORIS criteria; of these 1280 (20.8%) had some clinical activity, 3102 (50.4%) visits had serological activity only and 1768 (28.8%) visits had neither clinical nor serological activity. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with non-LLDAS, all three subsets of LLDAS had a protective association with flares in the ensuing 6 months and damage accrual in the ensuing 36 months. LLDAS with no clinical or serological activity had a significantly stronger protective association with severe flares in the ensuing 6 months compared with LLDAS with clinical activity (HR 0.47, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.82), p=0.007). Conclusions LLDAS without any clinical activity accounted for almost 80% of LLDAS visits. This study confirms that all subsets of LLDAS are associated with reduced flare and damage accrual. However, LLDAS without any clinical or serological activity has the strongest protective association with severe flares. Data are available on reasonable request. Access to APLC pooled data is subject to the specific guidelines outlined in the APLC data access policy (available on request to the APLC steering committee). The APLC welcomes requests for aggregate (summary) data or to perform analyses of new research questions, and such requests can be submitted to the APLC steering committee via the APLC project manager.","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterisation and outcomes of different subsets of low disease activity states in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus\",\"authors\":\"Yanjie Hao, Dylan Hansen, Worawit Louthrenoo, Yi-Hsing Chen, Jiacai Cho, Aisha Lateef, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Shue-Fen Luo, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu, Sandra Navarra, Leonid Zamora, Zhanguo Li, Sargunan Sockalingam, Yasuhiro Katsumata, Masayoshi Harigai, Zhuoli Zhang, Madelynn Chan, Jun Kikuchi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Sang-Cheol Bae, Fiona Goldblatt, Sean O’Neill, Kristine Ng, B M D B Basnayake, Nicola Tugnet, Yoshiya Tanaka, Chak Sing Lau, Ning Li, Vera Golder, Alberta Hoi, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Eric Morand, Shereen Oon, Mandana Nikpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2024-001217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who achieved LLDAS with clinical activity, serological activity only or neither clinical nor serological activity. Methods Patients with SLE enrolled in a prospective multinational cohort from March 2013 to December 2020 who were in LLDAS at least once were included. Visits that fulfilled both LLDAS and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria were excluded. Results 2099 patients were included, with median follow-up of 3.5 (IQR 1.3–5.8) years. At 6150 visits, patients were in LLDAS but not DORIS criteria; of these 1280 (20.8%) had some clinical activity, 3102 (50.4%) visits had serological activity only and 1768 (28.8%) visits had neither clinical nor serological activity. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with non-LLDAS, all three subsets of LLDAS had a protective association with flares in the ensuing 6 months and damage accrual in the ensuing 36 months. LLDAS with no clinical or serological activity had a significantly stronger protective association with severe flares in the ensuing 6 months compared with LLDAS with clinical activity (HR 0.47, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.82), p=0.007). Conclusions LLDAS without any clinical activity accounted for almost 80% of LLDAS visits. This study confirms that all subsets of LLDAS are associated with reduced flare and damage accrual. However, LLDAS without any clinical or serological activity has the strongest protective association with severe flares. Data are available on reasonable request. Access to APLC pooled data is subject to the specific guidelines outlined in the APLC data access policy (available on request to the APLC steering committee). The APLC welcomes requests for aggregate (summary) data or to perform analyses of new research questions, and such requests can be submitted to the APLC steering committee via the APLC project manager.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characterisation and outcomes of different subsets of low disease activity states in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Objectives The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who achieved LLDAS with clinical activity, serological activity only or neither clinical nor serological activity. Methods Patients with SLE enrolled in a prospective multinational cohort from March 2013 to December 2020 who were in LLDAS at least once were included. Visits that fulfilled both LLDAS and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria were excluded. Results 2099 patients were included, with median follow-up of 3.5 (IQR 1.3–5.8) years. At 6150 visits, patients were in LLDAS but not DORIS criteria; of these 1280 (20.8%) had some clinical activity, 3102 (50.4%) visits had serological activity only and 1768 (28.8%) visits had neither clinical nor serological activity. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with non-LLDAS, all three subsets of LLDAS had a protective association with flares in the ensuing 6 months and damage accrual in the ensuing 36 months. LLDAS with no clinical or serological activity had a significantly stronger protective association with severe flares in the ensuing 6 months compared with LLDAS with clinical activity (HR 0.47, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.82), p=0.007). Conclusions LLDAS without any clinical activity accounted for almost 80% of LLDAS visits. This study confirms that all subsets of LLDAS are associated with reduced flare and damage accrual. However, LLDAS without any clinical or serological activity has the strongest protective association with severe flares. Data are available on reasonable request. Access to APLC pooled data is subject to the specific guidelines outlined in the APLC data access policy (available on request to the APLC steering committee). The APLC welcomes requests for aggregate (summary) data or to perform analyses of new research questions, and such requests can be submitted to the APLC steering committee via the APLC project manager.
期刊介绍:
Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.