利用多层次回归确定相关性,并估算临床麻醉中因患者、从业人员、医院或医疗系统的实践差异而产生的原因和影响

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03408-3
Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Alan Yang, Ruxandra Pinto, Joel G. Ray, Andrea Hill, Damon C. Scales, Robert A. Fowler
{"title":"利用多层次回归确定相关性,并估算临床麻醉中因患者、从业人员、医院或医疗系统的实践差异而产生的原因和影响","authors":"Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Alan Yang, Ruxandra Pinto, Joel G. Ray, Andrea Hill, Damon C. Scales, Robert A. Fowler","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03408-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this research methods tutorial of clinical anesthesia, we will explore techniques to estimate the influence of a myriad of factors on patient outcomes. Big data that contain information on <i>patients</i>, treated by <i>individual anesthesiologists and surgical teams</i>, at different <i>hospitals</i>, have an inherent multi-level data structure (Fig. 1). While researchers often attempt to determine the association between patient factors and outcomes, that does not provide clinicians with the whole story. Patient care is <i>clustered</i> together according to clinicians and hospitals where they receive treatment. Therefore, multi-level regression models are needed to validly estimate the influence of each factor at each level. In addition, we will explore how to estimate the influence that <i>variability</i>—for example, one anesthesiologist deciding to do one thing, while another takes a different approach—has on outcomes for patients, using the <i>intra-class correlation coefficient</i> for continuous outcomes and the <i>median odds ratio</i> for binary outcomes. From this tutorial, you should acquire a clearer understanding of how to perform and interpret multi-level regression modeling and estimate the influence of variable clinical practices on patient outcomes in order to answer common but complex clinical questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using multi-level regression to determine associations and estimate causes and effects in clinical anesthesia due to patient, practitioner and hospital or health system practice variability\",\"authors\":\"Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Alan Yang, Ruxandra Pinto, Joel G. Ray, Andrea Hill, Damon C. Scales, Robert A. Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00540-024-03408-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this research methods tutorial of clinical anesthesia, we will explore techniques to estimate the influence of a myriad of factors on patient outcomes. Big data that contain information on <i>patients</i>, treated by <i>individual anesthesiologists and surgical teams</i>, at different <i>hospitals</i>, have an inherent multi-level data structure (Fig. 1). While researchers often attempt to determine the association between patient factors and outcomes, that does not provide clinicians with the whole story. Patient care is <i>clustered</i> together according to clinicians and hospitals where they receive treatment. Therefore, multi-level regression models are needed to validly estimate the influence of each factor at each level. In addition, we will explore how to estimate the influence that <i>variability</i>—for example, one anesthesiologist deciding to do one thing, while another takes a different approach—has on outcomes for patients, using the <i>intra-class correlation coefficient</i> for continuous outcomes and the <i>median odds ratio</i> for binary outcomes. From this tutorial, you should acquire a clearer understanding of how to perform and interpret multi-level regression modeling and estimate the influence of variable clinical practices on patient outcomes in order to answer common but complex clinical questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03408-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03408-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本临床麻醉研究方法教程中,我们将探讨估算各种因素对患者预后影响的技术。大数据包含不同医院的麻醉师和手术团队治疗的患者信息,具有固有的多层次数据结构(图 1)。虽然研究人员经常试图确定患者因素与结果之间的关联,但这并不能为临床医生提供全部信息。根据临床医生和接受治疗的医院的不同,患者的护理情况也不同。因此,需要使用多层次回归模型来有效估计每个因素在每个层次上的影响。此外,我们还将探讨如何使用连续结果的类内相关系数和二元结果的中位几率来估算变异性对患者结果的影响,例如,一位麻醉师决定做一件事,而另一位麻醉师则采取不同的方法。通过本教程,您应该能更清楚地了解如何执行和解释多级回归建模,以及如何估计可变临床实践对患者预后的影响,从而回答常见但复杂的临床问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using multi-level regression to determine associations and estimate causes and effects in clinical anesthesia due to patient, practitioner and hospital or health system practice variability

In this research methods tutorial of clinical anesthesia, we will explore techniques to estimate the influence of a myriad of factors on patient outcomes. Big data that contain information on patients, treated by individual anesthesiologists and surgical teams, at different hospitals, have an inherent multi-level data structure (Fig. 1). While researchers often attempt to determine the association between patient factors and outcomes, that does not provide clinicians with the whole story. Patient care is clustered together according to clinicians and hospitals where they receive treatment. Therefore, multi-level regression models are needed to validly estimate the influence of each factor at each level. In addition, we will explore how to estimate the influence that variability—for example, one anesthesiologist deciding to do one thing, while another takes a different approach—has on outcomes for patients, using the intra-class correlation coefficient for continuous outcomes and the median odds ratio for binary outcomes. From this tutorial, you should acquire a clearer understanding of how to perform and interpret multi-level regression modeling and estimate the influence of variable clinical practices on patient outcomes in order to answer common but complex clinical questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia. Advantages of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. McGRATH MAC size 1 vs. 2 blades: infant intubation time. Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study. Vasopressors against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1