Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Ninfa Candela, Tao Fan, Kandavadivu Umashankar, David T. Rubin
{"title":"对接受不同顺序的一线和二线生物治疗的炎症性肠病患者不良临床结果的评估:ROTARY 的研究结果","authors":"Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Ninfa Candela, Tao Fan, Kandavadivu Umashankar, David T. Rubin","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03378-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004–2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY\",\"authors\":\"Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Ninfa Candela, Tao Fan, Kandavadivu Umashankar, David T. Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-024-03378-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004–2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03378-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03378-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于慢性炎症,炎症性肠病(IBD)患者有可能出现发育不良,继而发展成结直肠癌(CRC)。患者还可能出现其他严重的疾病并发症,如住院和手术。目前有多种生物制剂可用于治疗 IBD 患者,一些患者由于对处方生物制剂失去反应或耐受性,需要接受多线治疗。以往的研究表明,初始生物制剂治疗的选择可能会影响后期治疗的效果。在这项研究中,我们评估了克罗恩病(CD)或溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者接受不同生物制剂治疗序列后的不良临床结局。ROTARY B 部分是一项使用 Optum® 临床数据库进行的回顾性队列研究,评估了先后接受两种生物制剂治疗的 CD 或 UC 患者的 IBD 相关住院、IBD 相关手术、发育不良、CRC 和感染的发生率。一线生物制剂包括阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、乌斯特库单抗(仅限 CD)和维多珠单抗;二线生物制剂包括英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗。在 CD 患者中,从乌司替库单抗到英夫利西单抗的治疗顺序与最高的住院(51.9%)、手术(40.7%)、CRC(3.7%)和感染(37.0%)总发生率相关。与连续接受两次抗肿瘤坏死因子α(anti-TNFα)治疗相比,韦多珠单抗治疗后再接受抗肿瘤坏死因子α(anti-TNFα)治疗,发生不良医疗事件(住院、手术或感染)的风险明显更低(几率比 1.526;95% 置信区间 1.004-2.320;P < 0.05)。在 UC 患者中,从维多单抗到阿达木单抗的治疗顺序导致不良结局的总体发生率最低(住院、手术、CRC、发育不良和感染的不良结局发生率分别为 20.3%、6.3%、0.0%、6.3% 和 4.7%)。我们描述了与CD或UC患者生物制剂排序相关的不良临床结果的差异,并证明了接受韦多珠单抗作为一线生物制剂的患者的良好结果。这些结果为临床医生选择 IBD 患者的生物制剂治疗顺序提供了潜在的指导。
Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004–2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.