是的,首相,提问顺序确实很重要,而且它肯定不是经典的!但它是量子的吗?

Dorje C. Brody
{"title":"是的,首相,提问顺序确实很重要,而且它肯定不是经典的!但它是量子的吗?","authors":"Dorje C. Brody","doi":"arxiv-2409.08930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response to a poll can be manipulated by means of a series of leading\nquestions. We show that such phenomena cannot be explained by use of classical\nprobability theory, whereas quantum probability theory admits a possibility of\noffering an explanation. Admissible transformation rules in quantum\nprobability, however, do impose some constraints on the modelling of cognitive\nbehaviour, which are highlighted here. Focusing on a recent poll conducted by\nIpsos on a set of questions posed by Sir Humphrey Appleby in an episode of the\nBritish political satire \\textit{Yes, Prime Minister}, we show that the\nresulting data cannot be explained quite so simply using quantum rules,\nalthough it seems not impossible.","PeriodicalId":501517,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yes, Prime Minister, question order does matter -- and it's certainly not classical! But is it quantum?\",\"authors\":\"Dorje C. Brody\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Response to a poll can be manipulated by means of a series of leading\\nquestions. We show that such phenomena cannot be explained by use of classical\\nprobability theory, whereas quantum probability theory admits a possibility of\\noffering an explanation. Admissible transformation rules in quantum\\nprobability, however, do impose some constraints on the modelling of cognitive\\nbehaviour, which are highlighted here. Focusing on a recent poll conducted by\\nIpsos on a set of questions posed by Sir Humphrey Appleby in an episode of the\\nBritish political satire \\\\textit{Yes, Prime Minister}, we show that the\\nresulting data cannot be explained quite so simply using quantum rules,\\nalthough it seems not impossible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过一系列引导性问题,可以操纵对民意调查的回应。我们证明,使用经典概率论无法解释这种现象,而量子概率论则有可能提供解释。不过,量子概率论中的可容许变换规则确实对认知行为的建模造成了一些限制,在此重点加以说明。最近,益普索(Ipsos)就英国政治讽刺剧《是的,首相》(textit{Yes, Prime Minister})中汉弗莱-阿普比爵士(Sir Humphrey Appleby)提出的一组问题进行了民意调查,我们以此为重点,说明虽然用量子规则似乎并非不可能,但却无法如此简单地解释得出的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yes, Prime Minister, question order does matter -- and it's certainly not classical! But is it quantum?
Response to a poll can be manipulated by means of a series of leading questions. We show that such phenomena cannot be explained by use of classical probability theory, whereas quantum probability theory admits a possibility of offering an explanation. Admissible transformation rules in quantum probability, however, do impose some constraints on the modelling of cognitive behaviour, which are highlighted here. Focusing on a recent poll conducted by Ipsos on a set of questions posed by Sir Humphrey Appleby in an episode of the British political satire \textit{Yes, Prime Minister}, we show that the resulting data cannot be explained quite so simply using quantum rules, although it seems not impossible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early reduced dopaminergic tone mediated by D3 receptor and dopamine transporter in absence epileptogenesis Contrasformer: A Brain Network Contrastive Transformer for Neurodegenerative Condition Identification Identifying Influential nodes in Brain Networks via Self-Supervised Graph-Transformer Contrastive Learning in Memristor-based Neuromorphic Systems Self-Attention Limits Working Memory Capacity of Transformer-Based Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1