高纤维、高碳水化合物饮食比低碳水化合物、低纤维饮食更有利于糖尿病的控制:快速回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1111/obr.13837
Andrew N Reynolds,Jessica Lang,Amanda Brand,Jim Mann
{"title":"高纤维、高碳水化合物饮食比低碳水化合物、低纤维饮食更有利于糖尿病的控制:快速回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Andrew N Reynolds,Jessica Lang,Amanda Brand,Jim Mann","doi":"10.1111/obr.13837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSome dietary recommendations continue to recommend carbohydrate restriction as a cornerstone of dietary advice for people with diabetes.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nWe compared the cardiometabolic effects of diets higher in both fiber and carbohydrate with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets in type 1 or type 2 diabetes.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to June 24, 2024, with additional hand searching.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nRandomized controlled trials in which both dietary fiber and carbohydrate amount had been modified were identified from source evidence syntheses on carbohydrate amount in people with diabetes.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nTwo reviewers independently.\r\n\r\nDATA SYNTHESIS\r\nTen eligible trials including 499 participants with diabetes (98% with T2) were identified from the potentially eligible 828 trials included in existing evidence syntheses. Pooled findings indicate that higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.50% [95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.02]), fasting insulin (MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15]), total cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01) when compared with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets. Trials with larger differences in fiber and carbohydrate intakes between interventions reported greater reductions. Certainty of evidence for these outcomes was moderate or high, with most outcomes downgraded due to heterogeneity unexplained by any single variable.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nOur predefined scope excluded trials with co-interventions such as energy restriction, which may have provided addition information.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFindings indicate the greater importance of promoting dietary fiber intakes, and the relative unimportance of carbohydrate amount in recommendations for people with diabetes.","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"55 1","pages":"e13837"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets better than lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets for diabetes management: Rapid review with meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew N Reynolds,Jessica Lang,Amanda Brand,Jim Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nSome dietary recommendations continue to recommend carbohydrate restriction as a cornerstone of dietary advice for people with diabetes.\\r\\n\\r\\nPURPOSE\\r\\nWe compared the cardiometabolic effects of diets higher in both fiber and carbohydrate with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets in type 1 or type 2 diabetes.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA SOURCES\\r\\nMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to June 24, 2024, with additional hand searching.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY SELECTION\\r\\nRandomized controlled trials in which both dietary fiber and carbohydrate amount had been modified were identified from source evidence syntheses on carbohydrate amount in people with diabetes.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA EXTRACTION\\r\\nTwo reviewers independently.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA SYNTHESIS\\r\\nTen eligible trials including 499 participants with diabetes (98% with T2) were identified from the potentially eligible 828 trials included in existing evidence syntheses. Pooled findings indicate that higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.50% [95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.02]), fasting insulin (MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15]), total cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01) when compared with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets. Trials with larger differences in fiber and carbohydrate intakes between interventions reported greater reductions. Certainty of evidence for these outcomes was moderate or high, with most outcomes downgraded due to heterogeneity unexplained by any single variable.\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nOur predefined scope excluded trials with co-interventions such as energy restriction, which may have provided addition information.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nFindings indicate the greater importance of promoting dietary fiber intakes, and the relative unimportance of carbohydrate amount in recommendations for people with diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"e13837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景一些膳食建议继续推荐限制碳水化合物,将其作为糖尿病患者膳食建议的基石。目的我们比较了纤维和碳水化合物含量均较高的膳食与碳水化合物含量较低的膳食对 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者心脏代谢的影响。从有关糖尿病患者碳水化合物摄入量的证据综述中筛选出膳食纤维和碳水化合物摄入量均有所改变的随机对照试验。汇总结果表明,高纤维、高碳水化合物饮食可降低 HbA1c(平均差 [MD] -0.50% [95% 置信区间 -0.99 至 -0.02])、空腹胰岛素(MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.与低碳水化合物、低纤维膳食相比,空腹胰岛素(MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15])、总胆固醇(MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05])和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01))。干预措施之间纤维和碳水化合物摄入量差异较大的试验报告了更大的降幅。结论研究结果表明,提高膳食纤维摄入量更为重要,而碳水化合物的摄入量在糖尿病患者的建议中相对不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets better than lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets for diabetes management: Rapid review with meta-analyses.
BACKGROUND Some dietary recommendations continue to recommend carbohydrate restriction as a cornerstone of dietary advice for people with diabetes. PURPOSE We compared the cardiometabolic effects of diets higher in both fiber and carbohydrate with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets in type 1 or type 2 diabetes. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to June 24, 2024, with additional hand searching. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials in which both dietary fiber and carbohydrate amount had been modified were identified from source evidence syntheses on carbohydrate amount in people with diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently. DATA SYNTHESIS Ten eligible trials including 499 participants with diabetes (98% with T2) were identified from the potentially eligible 828 trials included in existing evidence syntheses. Pooled findings indicate that higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.50% [95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.02]), fasting insulin (MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15]), total cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01) when compared with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets. Trials with larger differences in fiber and carbohydrate intakes between interventions reported greater reductions. Certainty of evidence for these outcomes was moderate or high, with most outcomes downgraded due to heterogeneity unexplained by any single variable. LIMITATIONS Our predefined scope excluded trials with co-interventions such as energy restriction, which may have provided addition information. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate the greater importance of promoting dietary fiber intakes, and the relative unimportance of carbohydrate amount in recommendations for people with diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
Trends in adherence to physical activity guidelines from 1997 to 2018 among adults with obesity: An analysis from the US National Health Interview Survey. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients of 70 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Valuing behavioral interventions for obesity reduction: A scoping review of economic models. Treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: The fat-trimming FGF21 approach. Recommender systems use in weight management mHealth interventions: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1