N. Karunakara , A.P. Vijith , Rosaline Mishra , B.K. Sahoo , Miroslaw Janik , Sudeep Kumara , B.K. Sapra , Shinji Tokonami , Chutima Kranrod , S. Chandrasekaran , N. Chitra , Seon hong Kim , Juhee Yoo , Chao Zhao , Bo Chen , Hong-Gi Kim , Jin-il Kim , Josef Holecek , Le Dinh Cuong
{"title":"亚太地区无源和有源 222Rn 测量装置的国际互比和质量评估","authors":"N. Karunakara , A.P. Vijith , Rosaline Mishra , B.K. Sahoo , Miroslaw Janik , Sudeep Kumara , B.K. Sapra , Shinji Tokonami , Chutima Kranrod , S. Chandrasekaran , N. Chitra , Seon hong Kim , Juhee Yoo , Chao Zhao , Bo Chen , Hong-Gi Kim , Jin-il Kim , Josef Holecek , Le Dinh Cuong","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intercomparison exercise is an integral part of the quality assurance programmes in <sup>222</sup>Rn measurements using active and passive devices. Ensuring the accuracy of data generated through measurements necessitates periodic performance checks. To achieve harmonization of methods, quantify biases and errors in measurements, and identify the reasons for discrepancies, there is a pressing need for periodic intercomparison exercises. To address this need of numerous laboratories, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, a calibration facility for <sup>222</sup>Rn measuring devices has been established at the Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity (CARER), Mangalore University, India. An international intercomparison exercise for the <sup>222</sup>Rn measuring devices was conducted at this facility in the year 2022 with the participation of 10 laboratories from six countries. A total of 354 devices (comprising of both active and passive detectors) were subjected to intercomparison measurements by exposing them to three concentration levels: (5.97 ± 0.29) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup>, (0.70 ± 0.09) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup> and (2.02 ± 0.20) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup> in separate experiments and the exposure durations were 7 days, 15 days, and 10 days respectively. The performance of each laboratory was evaluated following the criterion adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in its worldwide proficiency test programmes. This exercise brought out the fact that some of the laboratories need to improve their measurement practices to produce reliable data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International intercomparison and quality assessment of passive and active 222Rn measuring devices in the Asia-Pacific region\",\"authors\":\"N. Karunakara , A.P. Vijith , Rosaline Mishra , B.K. Sahoo , Miroslaw Janik , Sudeep Kumara , B.K. Sapra , Shinji Tokonami , Chutima Kranrod , S. Chandrasekaran , N. Chitra , Seon hong Kim , Juhee Yoo , Chao Zhao , Bo Chen , Hong-Gi Kim , Jin-il Kim , Josef Holecek , Le Dinh Cuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intercomparison exercise is an integral part of the quality assurance programmes in <sup>222</sup>Rn measurements using active and passive devices. Ensuring the accuracy of data generated through measurements necessitates periodic performance checks. To achieve harmonization of methods, quantify biases and errors in measurements, and identify the reasons for discrepancies, there is a pressing need for periodic intercomparison exercises. To address this need of numerous laboratories, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, a calibration facility for <sup>222</sup>Rn measuring devices has been established at the Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity (CARER), Mangalore University, India. An international intercomparison exercise for the <sup>222</sup>Rn measuring devices was conducted at this facility in the year 2022 with the participation of 10 laboratories from six countries. A total of 354 devices (comprising of both active and passive detectors) were subjected to intercomparison measurements by exposing them to three concentration levels: (5.97 ± 0.29) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup>, (0.70 ± 0.09) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup> and (2.02 ± 0.20) × 10<sup>3</sup> Bq m<sup>−3</sup> in separate experiments and the exposure durations were 7 days, 15 days, and 10 days respectively. The performance of each laboratory was evaluated following the criterion adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in its worldwide proficiency test programmes. This exercise brought out the fact that some of the laboratories need to improve their measurement practices to produce reliable data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
International intercomparison and quality assessment of passive and active 222Rn measuring devices in the Asia-Pacific region
Intercomparison exercise is an integral part of the quality assurance programmes in 222Rn measurements using active and passive devices. Ensuring the accuracy of data generated through measurements necessitates periodic performance checks. To achieve harmonization of methods, quantify biases and errors in measurements, and identify the reasons for discrepancies, there is a pressing need for periodic intercomparison exercises. To address this need of numerous laboratories, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, a calibration facility for 222Rn measuring devices has been established at the Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity (CARER), Mangalore University, India. An international intercomparison exercise for the 222Rn measuring devices was conducted at this facility in the year 2022 with the participation of 10 laboratories from six countries. A total of 354 devices (comprising of both active and passive detectors) were subjected to intercomparison measurements by exposing them to three concentration levels: (5.97 ± 0.29) × 103 Bq m−3, (0.70 ± 0.09) × 103 Bq m−3 and (2.02 ± 0.20) × 103 Bq m−3 in separate experiments and the exposure durations were 7 days, 15 days, and 10 days respectively. The performance of each laboratory was evaluated following the criterion adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in its worldwide proficiency test programmes. This exercise brought out the fact that some of the laboratories need to improve their measurement practices to produce reliable data.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.