探索 AR 引导的心理运动任务中的专业知识维度

Steven Yoo, Casper Harteveld, Nicholas Wilson, Kemi Jona, Mohsen Moghaddam
{"title":"探索 AR 引导的心理运动任务中的专业知识维度","authors":"Steven Yoo, Casper Harteveld, Nicholas Wilson, Kemi Jona, Mohsen Moghaddam","doi":"arxiv-2409.11599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore how novices and experts differ in performing\ncomplex psychomotor tasks guided by augmented reality (AR), focusing on\ndecision-making and technical proficiency. Participants were divided into\nnovice and expert groups based on a pre-questionnaire assessing their technical\nskills and theoretical knowledge of precision inspection. Participants\ncompleted a post-study questionnaire that evaluated cognitive load (NASA-TLX),\nself-efficacy, and experience with the HoloLens 2 and AR app, along with\ngeneral feedback. We used multimodal data from AR devices and wearables,\nincluding hand tracking, galvanic skin response, and gaze tracking, to measure\nkey performance metrics. We found that experts significantly outperformed\nnovices in decision-making speed, efficiency, accuracy, and dexterity in the\nexecution of technical tasks. Novices exhibited a positive correlation between\nperceived performance in the NASA-TLX and the GSR amplitude, indicating that\nhigher perceived performance is associated with increased physiological stress\nresponses. This study provides a foundation for designing multidimensional\nexpertise estimation models to enable personalized industrial AR training\nsystems.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Dimensions of Expertise in AR-Guided Psychomotor Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Steven Yoo, Casper Harteveld, Nicholas Wilson, Kemi Jona, Mohsen Moghaddam\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to explore how novices and experts differ in performing\\ncomplex psychomotor tasks guided by augmented reality (AR), focusing on\\ndecision-making and technical proficiency. Participants were divided into\\nnovice and expert groups based on a pre-questionnaire assessing their technical\\nskills and theoretical knowledge of precision inspection. Participants\\ncompleted a post-study questionnaire that evaluated cognitive load (NASA-TLX),\\nself-efficacy, and experience with the HoloLens 2 and AR app, along with\\ngeneral feedback. We used multimodal data from AR devices and wearables,\\nincluding hand tracking, galvanic skin response, and gaze tracking, to measure\\nkey performance metrics. We found that experts significantly outperformed\\nnovices in decision-making speed, efficiency, accuracy, and dexterity in the\\nexecution of technical tasks. Novices exhibited a positive correlation between\\nperceived performance in the NASA-TLX and the GSR amplitude, indicating that\\nhigher perceived performance is associated with increased physiological stress\\nresponses. This study provides a foundation for designing multidimensional\\nexpertise estimation models to enable personalized industrial AR training\\nsystems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探索新手和专家在执行由增强现实(AR)引导的复杂心理运动任务时有何不同,重点关注决策制定和技术熟练程度。根据评估技术技能和精密检测理论知识的前置问卷,参与者被分为新手组和专家组。参与者填写了一份研究后问卷,评估认知负荷(NASA-TLX)、自我效能、使用 HoloLens 2 和 AR 应用程序的经验以及一般反馈。我们使用来自 AR 设备和可穿戴设备的多模态数据(包括手部跟踪、皮肤电反应和注视跟踪)来测量关键的性能指标。我们发现,在执行技术任务时,专家在决策速度、效率、准确性和灵巧性方面都明显优于新手。新手在NASA-TLX中的感知表现与GSR振幅呈正相关,这表明较高的感知表现与生理压力反应的增加有关。这项研究为设计多维度技能估计模型奠定了基础,从而实现个性化的工业AR培训系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Dimensions of Expertise in AR-Guided Psychomotor Tasks
This study aimed to explore how novices and experts differ in performing complex psychomotor tasks guided by augmented reality (AR), focusing on decision-making and technical proficiency. Participants were divided into novice and expert groups based on a pre-questionnaire assessing their technical skills and theoretical knowledge of precision inspection. Participants completed a post-study questionnaire that evaluated cognitive load (NASA-TLX), self-efficacy, and experience with the HoloLens 2 and AR app, along with general feedback. We used multimodal data from AR devices and wearables, including hand tracking, galvanic skin response, and gaze tracking, to measure key performance metrics. We found that experts significantly outperformed novices in decision-making speed, efficiency, accuracy, and dexterity in the execution of technical tasks. Novices exhibited a positive correlation between perceived performance in the NASA-TLX and the GSR amplitude, indicating that higher perceived performance is associated with increased physiological stress responses. This study provides a foundation for designing multidimensional expertise estimation models to enable personalized industrial AR training systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equimetrics -- Applying HAR principles to equestrian activities AI paintings vs. Human Paintings? Deciphering Public Interactions and Perceptions towards AI-Generated Paintings on TikTok From Data Stories to Dialogues: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Generative AI Agents and Data Storytelling in Enhancing Data Visualisation Comprehension Exploring Gaze Pattern in Autistic Children: Clustering, Visualization, and Prediction Revealing the Challenge of Detecting Character Knowledge Errors in LLM Role-Playing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1