当系统不合适时:就业顾问的应对策略

Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe
{"title":"当系统不合适时:就业顾问的应对策略","authors":"Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe","doi":"arxiv-2409.09457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across\npublic agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration\nwithin the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the\nclients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and\nknowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying\nunfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or\nrevealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain\nsomething) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation\nin the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make\nuse of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend\nexisting boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the\nrules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils\nthe forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their\ncontacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual\nand the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as\nthe internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold\ncontribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment\nagencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus\ndemonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they\ncontribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the\nconsultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces\nbetween the system and the client.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants\",\"authors\":\"Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across\\npublic agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration\\nwithin the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the\\nclients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and\\nknowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying\\nunfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or\\nrevealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain\\nsomething) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation\\nin the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make\\nuse of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend\\nexisting boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the\\nrules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils\\nthe forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their\\ncontacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual\\nand the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as\\nthe internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold\\ncontribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment\\nagencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus\\ndemonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they\\ncontribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the\\nconsultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces\\nbetween the system and the client.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

案例和知识管理系统遍布公共机构的第一线。然而,这些系统专门用于机构内部的协作,而不是与客户进行面对面的互动。如果将案例和知识管理系统用作前线的协作资源,它可能会通过显示未经过滤的内部信息、披露其他客户的私人数据或揭示前线员工的能力极限(如果他们无法解释某些事情)或权限极限(如果他们无法推翻某些事情)来干扰服务的提供。对德国公共职业介绍所的观察表明,职业顾问在面对面咨询时会使用各种应对策略,以扩展案例和知识管理系统以及使用规则所设定的现有界限。对这些应对策略的分析揭示了影响就业顾问在与客户接触过程中行为的各种力量:顾问自身对工作的理解、客户的实际需求和感知需求、政治使命以及就业机构的内部规则。研究结果有两方面的贡献:首先,通过说明社会福利机构的复杂性是如何在单一的行为模式中体现出来的,这些研究成果为有关职业介绍所工作的讨论做出了贡献。其次,通过将顾问描绘成系统与客户之间积极、有意识的调解人,而不是被动的界面,这些研究成果为有关屏幕级官僚机构的讨论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants
Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across public agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration within the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the clients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and knowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying unfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or revealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain something) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation in the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make use of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend existing boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the rules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils the forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their contacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual and the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as the internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold contribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment agencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus demonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they contribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the consultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces between the system and the client.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equimetrics -- Applying HAR principles to equestrian activities AI paintings vs. Human Paintings? Deciphering Public Interactions and Perceptions towards AI-Generated Paintings on TikTok From Data Stories to Dialogues: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Generative AI Agents and Data Storytelling in Enhancing Data Visualisation Comprehension Exploring Gaze Pattern in Autistic Children: Clustering, Visualization, and Prediction Revealing the Challenge of Detecting Character Knowledge Errors in LLM Role-Playing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1