Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe
{"title":"当系统不合适时:就业顾问的应对策略","authors":"Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe","doi":"arxiv-2409.09457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across\npublic agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration\nwithin the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the\nclients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and\nknowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying\nunfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or\nrevealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain\nsomething) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation\nin the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make\nuse of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend\nexisting boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the\nrules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils\nthe forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their\ncontacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual\nand the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as\nthe internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold\ncontribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment\nagencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus\ndemonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they\ncontribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the\nconsultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces\nbetween the system and the client.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants\",\"authors\":\"Mateusz Dolata, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti, Gerhard Schwabe\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across\\npublic agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration\\nwithin the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the\\nclients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and\\nknowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying\\nunfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or\\nrevealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain\\nsomething) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation\\nin the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make\\nuse of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend\\nexisting boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the\\nrules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils\\nthe forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their\\ncontacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual\\nand the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as\\nthe internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold\\ncontribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment\\nagencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus\\ndemonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they\\ncontribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the\\nconsultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces\\nbetween the system and the client.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
When the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants
Case and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across
public agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration
within the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the
clients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and
knowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying
unfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or
revealing the limits of frontline employees' competence (if they cannot explain
something) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation
in the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make
use of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend
existing boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the
rules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils
the forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their
contacts with clients: the consultants' own understanding of work, the actual
and the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as
the internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold
contribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment
agencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus
demonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they
contribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the
consultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces
between the system and the client.