类人推理的自动控制:探索语言模型嵌入式空中交通代理

Justas Andriuškevičius, Junzi Sun
{"title":"类人推理的自动控制:探索语言模型嵌入式空中交通代理","authors":"Justas Andriuškevičius, Junzi Sun","doi":"arxiv-2409.09717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in language models have created new opportunities in air\ntraffic control studies. The current focus is primarily on text and\nlanguage-based use cases. However, these language models may offer a higher\npotential impact in the air traffic control domain, thanks to their ability to\ninteract with air traffic environments in an embodied agent form. They also\nprovide a language-like reasoning capability to explain their decisions, which\nhas been a significant roadblock for the implementation of automatic air\ntraffic control. This paper investigates the application of a language model-based agent with\nfunction-calling and learning capabilities to resolve air traffic conflicts\nwithout human intervention. The main components of this research are\nfoundational large language models, tools that allow the agent to interact with\nthe simulator, and a new concept, the experience library. An innovative part of\nthis research, the experience library, is a vector database that stores\nsynthesized knowledge that agents have learned from interactions with the\nsimulations and language models. To evaluate the performance of our language model-based agent, both\nopen-source and closed-source models were tested. The results of our study\nreveal significant differences in performance across various configurations of\nthe language model-based agents. The best-performing configuration was able to\nsolve almost all 120 but one imminent conflict scenarios, including up to four\naircraft at the same time. Most importantly, the agents are able to provide\nhuman-level text explanations on traffic situations and conflict resolution\nstrategies.","PeriodicalId":501479,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Control With Human-Like Reasoning: Exploring Language Model Embodied Air Traffic Agents\",\"authors\":\"Justas Andriuškevičius, Junzi Sun\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent developments in language models have created new opportunities in air\\ntraffic control studies. The current focus is primarily on text and\\nlanguage-based use cases. However, these language models may offer a higher\\npotential impact in the air traffic control domain, thanks to their ability to\\ninteract with air traffic environments in an embodied agent form. They also\\nprovide a language-like reasoning capability to explain their decisions, which\\nhas been a significant roadblock for the implementation of automatic air\\ntraffic control. This paper investigates the application of a language model-based agent with\\nfunction-calling and learning capabilities to resolve air traffic conflicts\\nwithout human intervention. The main components of this research are\\nfoundational large language models, tools that allow the agent to interact with\\nthe simulator, and a new concept, the experience library. An innovative part of\\nthis research, the experience library, is a vector database that stores\\nsynthesized knowledge that agents have learned from interactions with the\\nsimulations and language models. To evaluate the performance of our language model-based agent, both\\nopen-source and closed-source models were tested. The results of our study\\nreveal significant differences in performance across various configurations of\\nthe language model-based agents. The best-performing configuration was able to\\nsolve almost all 120 but one imminent conflict scenarios, including up to four\\naircraft at the same time. Most importantly, the agents are able to provide\\nhuman-level text explanations on traffic situations and conflict resolution\\nstrategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言模型的最新发展为空中交通管制研究创造了新的机遇。目前的重点主要是基于文本和语言的使用案例。然而,由于这些语言模型能够以具身代理的形式与空中交通环境互动,因此可能会对空中交通管制领域产生更大的潜在影响。它们还提供了类似语言的推理能力来解释它们的决策,而这一直是实施自动空中交通管制的一个重大障碍。本文研究了基于语言模型、具有功能调用和学习能力的代理如何在没有人工干预的情况下解决空中交通冲突。这项研究的主要内容包括基础大型语言模型、允许代理与模拟器交互的工具,以及一个新概念--经验库。经验库是这项研究的创新部分,它是一个向量数据库,存储了代理从与模拟和语言模型的交互中学到的合成知识。为了评估基于语言模型的代理的性能,我们对开源和闭源模型进行了测试。我们的研究结果表明,基于语言模型的代理的各种配置在性能上存在显著差异。性能最好的配置能够解决几乎所有 120 个迫在眉睫的冲突场景,只有一个例外,其中包括多达四架飞机同时发生冲突。最重要的是,这些代理能够就交通状况和冲突解决策略提供人类水平的文本解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automatic Control With Human-Like Reasoning: Exploring Language Model Embodied Air Traffic Agents
Recent developments in language models have created new opportunities in air traffic control studies. The current focus is primarily on text and language-based use cases. However, these language models may offer a higher potential impact in the air traffic control domain, thanks to their ability to interact with air traffic environments in an embodied agent form. They also provide a language-like reasoning capability to explain their decisions, which has been a significant roadblock for the implementation of automatic air traffic control. This paper investigates the application of a language model-based agent with function-calling and learning capabilities to resolve air traffic conflicts without human intervention. The main components of this research are foundational large language models, tools that allow the agent to interact with the simulator, and a new concept, the experience library. An innovative part of this research, the experience library, is a vector database that stores synthesized knowledge that agents have learned from interactions with the simulations and language models. To evaluate the performance of our language model-based agent, both open-source and closed-source models were tested. The results of our study reveal significant differences in performance across various configurations of the language model-based agents. The best-performing configuration was able to solve almost all 120 but one imminent conflict scenarios, including up to four aircraft at the same time. Most importantly, the agents are able to provide human-level text explanations on traffic situations and conflict resolution strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abductive explanations of classifiers under constraints: Complexity and properties Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic Towards Explainable Goal Recognition Using Weight of Evidence (WoE): A Human-Centered Approach A Metric Hybrid Planning Approach to Solving Pandemic Planning Problems with Simple SIR Models Neural Networks for Vehicle Routing Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1