用于透射型 X 射线管剂量测定的蒙特卡洛统计技术比较。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ad7bbf
Chen-Ju Feng,Chin-Hui Wu,Chin-Hsiung Lin,Shu-Wei Wu,Shih-Yong Luo,Ya-Ru Yang,Chao-Hua Lee,Shao-Chun Tseng,Shen-Hao Lee,Shih-Ming Hsu,Chin-Hui Wu
{"title":"用于透射型 X 射线管剂量测定的蒙特卡洛统计技术比较。","authors":"Chen-Ju Feng,Chin-Hui Wu,Chin-Hsiung Lin,Shu-Wei Wu,Shih-Yong Luo,Ya-Ru Yang,Chao-Hua Lee,Shao-Chun Tseng,Shen-Hao Lee,Shih-Ming Hsu,Chin-Hui Wu","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad7bbf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discussed comparing result accuracy and time cost under different tally methods using MCNP6 for a novel transmission X-ray tube which was designed for the Auger electron yield with specific material (eg. iodine). The assessment included photon spectrum, percent depth dose, mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to air and water, and figure of merit comparison. The mean energy of in-air phantom was from 41.8 keV (0 mm) to 40.9 keV (100 mm), and the mean energy of in-water phantom was from 41.41 keV (0 mm) to 45.2 keV (100 mm). The specific dose conversion factors based mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to different materials was established and the difference was less than 2% for the dose conversion of FMESH comparing to measurement data. FMESH had better figure of merit (FOM) than the F6 tally for the dose parameter assessment, which mean the dose calculation that focused on the superficial region could be assessed with more calculation efficiency by FMESH tally for this novel transmission X-ray tube. The results of this study could help develop treatment planning system (TPS) to quickly obtain the calculated data for phase space data establishment and heterogeneous correction under different physical condition settings.&#xD.","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of monte carlo tally techniques for dosimetry in a transmission-type X-ray tube.\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Ju Feng,Chin-Hui Wu,Chin-Hsiung Lin,Shu-Wei Wu,Shih-Yong Luo,Ya-Ru Yang,Chao-Hua Lee,Shao-Chun Tseng,Shen-Hao Lee,Shih-Ming Hsu,Chin-Hui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/ad7bbf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discussed comparing result accuracy and time cost under different tally methods using MCNP6 for a novel transmission X-ray tube which was designed for the Auger electron yield with specific material (eg. iodine). The assessment included photon spectrum, percent depth dose, mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to air and water, and figure of merit comparison. The mean energy of in-air phantom was from 41.8 keV (0 mm) to 40.9 keV (100 mm), and the mean energy of in-water phantom was from 41.41 keV (0 mm) to 45.2 keV (100 mm). The specific dose conversion factors based mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to different materials was established and the difference was less than 2% for the dose conversion of FMESH comparing to measurement data. FMESH had better figure of merit (FOM) than the F6 tally for the dose parameter assessment, which mean the dose calculation that focused on the superficial region could be assessed with more calculation efficiency by FMESH tally for this novel transmission X-ray tube. The results of this study could help develop treatment planning system (TPS) to quickly obtain the calculated data for phase space data establishment and heterogeneous correction under different physical condition settings.&#xD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7bbf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7bbf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究讨论了使用 MCNP6 对新型透射 X 射线管进行不同统计方法下的结果准确性和时间成本比较,该 X 射线管是为特定材料(如碘)的奥格电子产率而设计的。评估内容包括光子光谱、深度剂量百分比、与空气和水相对应的质能吸收系数以及优点比较。空气中模型的平均能量为 41.8 keV(0 毫米)至 40.9 keV(100 毫米),水中模型的平均能量为 41.41 keV(0 毫米)至 45.2 keV(100 毫米)。根据不同材料的质能吸收系数确定了具体的剂量换算系数,与测量数据相比,FMESH 的剂量换算系数相差不到 2%。在剂量参数评估方面,FMESH 比 F6 计数值具有更好的优点(FOM),这意味着对于这种新型透射 X 射线管,FMESH 计数值能以更高的计算效率评估侧重于表层区域的剂量计算。本研究的结果有助于开发治疗计划系统(TPS),在不同的物理条件设置下快速获得相空间数据建立和异质校正的计算数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of monte carlo tally techniques for dosimetry in a transmission-type X-ray tube.
This study discussed comparing result accuracy and time cost under different tally methods using MCNP6 for a novel transmission X-ray tube which was designed for the Auger electron yield with specific material (eg. iodine). The assessment included photon spectrum, percent depth dose, mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to air and water, and figure of merit comparison. The mean energy of in-air phantom was from 41.8 keV (0 mm) to 40.9 keV (100 mm), and the mean energy of in-water phantom was from 41.41 keV (0 mm) to 45.2 keV (100 mm). The specific dose conversion factors based mass-energy absorption coefficient corresponding to different materials was established and the difference was less than 2% for the dose conversion of FMESH comparing to measurement data. FMESH had better figure of merit (FOM) than the F6 tally for the dose parameter assessment, which mean the dose calculation that focused on the superficial region could be assessed with more calculation efficiency by FMESH tally for this novel transmission X-ray tube. The results of this study could help develop treatment planning system (TPS) to quickly obtain the calculated data for phase space data establishment and heterogeneous correction under different physical condition settings. .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing pulmonary chest x-ray classification with stacked feature ensemble and swin transformer integration. Multi-level digital-twin models of pulmonary mechanics: correlation analysis of 3D CT lung volume and 2D Chest motion. Radar-based contactless heart beat detection with a modified Pan-Tompkins algorithm. Systematic characterization of new EBT4 radiochromic films in clinical x-ray beams. In silicodosimetry for a prostate cancer treatment using198Au nanoparticles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1