带有出血点的高风险动脉瘤的放射线组学分析:一项探索性研究

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022133
Carlos Dier, Sebastian Sanchez, Elena Sagues, Andres Gudino, Rodrigo Jaramillo, Linder Wendt, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"带有出血点的高风险动脉瘤的放射线组学分析:一项探索性研究","authors":"Carlos Dier, Sebastian Sanchez, Elena Sagues, Andres Gudino, Rodrigo Jaramillo, Linder Wendt, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Blebs significantly increase rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. Radiomic analysis offers a robust characterization of the aneurysm wall. However, the unique radiomic profile of various compartments, including blebs, remains unexplored. Likewise, the correlation between these imaging markers and fluid/mechanical metrics is yet to be investigated. To address this, we analyzed the radiomic features (RFs) of bleb-containing aneurysms and their relationship with wall tension and shear stress metrics, aiming to enhance risk assessment. Methods Aneurysms were imaged using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A T1 and a T1 after contrast (T1+Gd) sequences were acquired. 3D models of aneurysm bodies and blebs were generated, and RFs were extracted. Aneurysms with and without blebs were matched based on location and size for analysis. Univariate regression models and Spearman’s correlations were used to establish associations between bleb-dependent RFs and mechanical/fluid dynamics metrics. Results Eighteen aneurysms with blebs were identified. Fifty-five RFs were significantly different between blebs and body within the same aneurysms. Of these RFs, 9% (5/55) were first-order, and 91% (50/55) were second-order features. After aneurysms with and without blebs were matched for location and size, five RFs 5% (5/93) were significantly different. Forty-one out of the 55 RFs different between bleb and body sac of the primary aneurysm were moderately and strongly correlated with mechanical and fluid dynamics metrics. Conclusion Aneurysm blebs exhibit distinct radiomic profiles compared with the main body of the aneurysm sac. The variability in bleb wall characteristics may arise from differing mechanical stresses and localized hemodynamics. Leveraging radiomic profiling could help identify regions with a heightened risk of rupture. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomic profiling of high-risk aneurysms with blebs: an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Dier, Sebastian Sanchez, Elena Sagues, Andres Gudino, Rodrigo Jaramillo, Linder Wendt, Edgar A Samaniego\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Blebs significantly increase rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. Radiomic analysis offers a robust characterization of the aneurysm wall. However, the unique radiomic profile of various compartments, including blebs, remains unexplored. Likewise, the correlation between these imaging markers and fluid/mechanical metrics is yet to be investigated. To address this, we analyzed the radiomic features (RFs) of bleb-containing aneurysms and their relationship with wall tension and shear stress metrics, aiming to enhance risk assessment. Methods Aneurysms were imaged using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A T1 and a T1 after contrast (T1+Gd) sequences were acquired. 3D models of aneurysm bodies and blebs were generated, and RFs were extracted. Aneurysms with and without blebs were matched based on location and size for analysis. Univariate regression models and Spearman’s correlations were used to establish associations between bleb-dependent RFs and mechanical/fluid dynamics metrics. Results Eighteen aneurysms with blebs were identified. Fifty-five RFs were significantly different between blebs and body within the same aneurysms. Of these RFs, 9% (5/55) were first-order, and 91% (50/55) were second-order features. After aneurysms with and without blebs were matched for location and size, five RFs 5% (5/93) were significantly different. Forty-one out of the 55 RFs different between bleb and body sac of the primary aneurysm were moderately and strongly correlated with mechanical and fluid dynamics metrics. Conclusion Aneurysm blebs exhibit distinct radiomic profiles compared with the main body of the aneurysm sac. The variability in bleb wall characteristics may arise from differing mechanical stresses and localized hemodynamics. Leveraging radiomic profiling could help identify regions with a heightened risk of rupture. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022133\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 动脉瘤出血会大大增加颅内动脉瘤破裂的风险。放射学分析可提供动脉瘤壁的可靠特征。然而,包括出血点在内的各种区段的独特放射学特征仍有待探索。同样,这些成像标记与流体/机械指标之间的相关性也有待研究。为此,我们分析了含血栓动脉瘤的放射学特征(RF)及其与动脉瘤壁张力和剪应力指标的关系,旨在加强风险评估。方法 使用高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)对动脉瘤进行成像。采集了 T1 和造影后 T1(T1+Gd)序列。生成动脉瘤体和瘤栓的三维模型,并提取射频。根据位置和大小对有出血点和无出血点的动脉瘤进行匹配分析。使用单变量回归模型和斯皮尔曼相关性来确定栓带依赖性射频和机械/流体动力学指标之间的关联。结果 确定了 18 个有出血点的动脉瘤。在同一动脉瘤中,出血点和瘤体之间有 55 个 RFs 显著不同。在这些射频中,9%(5/55)为一阶特征,91%(50/55)为二阶特征。对有出血点和无出血点的动脉瘤进行位置和大小匹配后,5%(5/93)的 RFs 存在显著差异。在原发性动脉瘤瘤栓和瘤体囊之间不同的 55 个 RFs 中,有 41 个与机械和流体动力学指标呈中度和高度相关。结论 与动脉瘤囊主体相比,动脉瘤栓泡表现出不同的放射学特征。瘤栓壁特征的变化可能源于不同的机械应力和局部血流动力学。利用放射轮廓分析有助于确定破裂风险较高的区域。与该研究相关的所有数据都包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiomic profiling of high-risk aneurysms with blebs: an exploratory study
Background Blebs significantly increase rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. Radiomic analysis offers a robust characterization of the aneurysm wall. However, the unique radiomic profile of various compartments, including blebs, remains unexplored. Likewise, the correlation between these imaging markers and fluid/mechanical metrics is yet to be investigated. To address this, we analyzed the radiomic features (RFs) of bleb-containing aneurysms and their relationship with wall tension and shear stress metrics, aiming to enhance risk assessment. Methods Aneurysms were imaged using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A T1 and a T1 after contrast (T1+Gd) sequences were acquired. 3D models of aneurysm bodies and blebs were generated, and RFs were extracted. Aneurysms with and without blebs were matched based on location and size for analysis. Univariate regression models and Spearman’s correlations were used to establish associations between bleb-dependent RFs and mechanical/fluid dynamics metrics. Results Eighteen aneurysms with blebs were identified. Fifty-five RFs were significantly different between blebs and body within the same aneurysms. Of these RFs, 9% (5/55) were first-order, and 91% (50/55) were second-order features. After aneurysms with and without blebs were matched for location and size, five RFs 5% (5/93) were significantly different. Forty-one out of the 55 RFs different between bleb and body sac of the primary aneurysm were moderately and strongly correlated with mechanical and fluid dynamics metrics. Conclusion Aneurysm blebs exhibit distinct radiomic profiles compared with the main body of the aneurysm sac. The variability in bleb wall characteristics may arise from differing mechanical stresses and localized hemodynamics. Leveraging radiomic profiling could help identify regions with a heightened risk of rupture. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Management of a fractured microcatheter during middle meningeal artery embolization. Onyx embolization for salvage hemostasis after intraoperative rupture. Removal of errant coils using the Tigertriever-13. Rescue techniques for intravascular mechanical obstruction following Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device detachment. The retrograde pressure cooker technique for transvenous embolization of a residual arteriovenous malformation following stereotactic radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1