多发性硬化症患者的耻辱感与健康结果:系统性综述

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03853-3
Bradley Powell, Roger Mills, Alan Tennant, Carolyn A. Young, Dawn Langdon
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的耻辱感与健康结果:系统性综述","authors":"Bradley Powell, Roger Mills, Alan Tennant, Carolyn A. Young, Dawn Langdon","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03853-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stigma is increasingly recognised as contributing to disability in MS. This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: To what extent is stigma associated with psychological and physical health outcomes in MS? The inclusion criteria were: scientific publication of original quantitative research in adults with MS and/or Clinically Isolated Syndrome; outcome measures including a measurement of stigma and psychological and/or physical health; peer reviewed articles in the English language. Pubmed, PsycINFO and Science Direct were searched in November 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in all of the identified studies. The following data was extracted: (1) author and publication year, (2) country, (3) design, (4) sample size and demographics, (5) stigma measure, (6) psychological and/or physical health outcomes, 8) key findings. 18 Studies were identified, reporting in total 22,021 adult participants with multiple sclerosis, with individual sample sizes ranging from 33 to 6,670. The review consistently identified stigma to be significantly associated with adverse psychological and physical health outcomes in all 18 identified studies. Over half of all identified studies investigated depression and stigma and over half investigated quality of life and stigma, and a significant association was demonstrated for both of these variables with stigma in all of these studies. Limitations are that most studies were Western with primarily white participants. Only variables studied could be reported and therefore only a selective perspective of stigma in MS could be explored. A meta-analysis was not feasible, due to the variety of stigma definitions and measures employed. A model of stigma in MS is presented and possible interventions to manage stigma in MS are discussed. A need for international action to develop a consensus measure of MS stigma and determine the trajectory and causal dynamics of MS stigma is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma and health outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Bradley Powell, Roger Mills, Alan Tennant, Carolyn A. Young, Dawn Langdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03853-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stigma is increasingly recognised as contributing to disability in MS. This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: To what extent is stigma associated with psychological and physical health outcomes in MS? The inclusion criteria were: scientific publication of original quantitative research in adults with MS and/or Clinically Isolated Syndrome; outcome measures including a measurement of stigma and psychological and/or physical health; peer reviewed articles in the English language. Pubmed, PsycINFO and Science Direct were searched in November 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in all of the identified studies. The following data was extracted: (1) author and publication year, (2) country, (3) design, (4) sample size and demographics, (5) stigma measure, (6) psychological and/or physical health outcomes, 8) key findings. 18 Studies were identified, reporting in total 22,021 adult participants with multiple sclerosis, with individual sample sizes ranging from 33 to 6,670. The review consistently identified stigma to be significantly associated with adverse psychological and physical health outcomes in all 18 identified studies. Over half of all identified studies investigated depression and stigma and over half investigated quality of life and stigma, and a significant association was demonstrated for both of these variables with stigma in all of these studies. Limitations are that most studies were Western with primarily white participants. Only variables studied could be reported and therefore only a selective perspective of stigma in MS could be explored. A meta-analysis was not feasible, due to the variety of stigma definitions and measures employed. A model of stigma in MS is presented and possible interventions to manage stigma in MS are discussed. A need for international action to develop a consensus measure of MS stigma and determine the trajectory and causal dynamics of MS stigma is highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03853-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03853-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人认识到污名化是导致多发性硬化症残疾的原因之一。本系统综述旨在回答以下问题:在多发性硬化症患者中,成见在多大程度上与心理和生理健康结果相关?纳入标准为:针对多发性硬化症和/或临床孤立综合征成人的原创定量研究的科学出版物;结果测量包括对耻辱感和心理及/或身体健康的测量;同行评审的英文文章。2023 年 11 月,对 Pubmed、PsycINFO 和 Science Direct 进行了检索。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的 "批判性评估工具"(Critical Appraisal Tool)用于评估所有已确定研究的方法质量和偏倚风险。提取了以下数据:(1)作者和发表年份;(2)国家;(3)设计;(4)样本量和人口统计学;(5)污名化测量;(6)心理和/或身体健康结果;(8)主要发现。18 项研究共报告了 22,021 名患有多发性硬化症的成年参与者,单个样本量从 33 到 6,670 不等。在所有 18 项已确定的研究中,综述一致认为成见与不良心理和生理健康后果有显著关联。在所有已确定的研究中,有一半以上调查了抑郁和污名化,一半以上调查了生活质量和污名化,在所有这些研究中,这两个变量都与污名化有显著关联。局限性在于,大多数研究都是西方国家的研究,参与者主要是白人。只能报告所研究的变量,因此只能从选择性的角度探讨多发性硬化症的耻辱感。由于所采用的成见定义和测量方法多种多样,因此无法进行荟萃分析。本文介绍了多发性硬化症的成见模型,并讨论了管理多发性硬化症成见的可能干预措施。报告强调,需要采取国际行动,制定一个一致认可的多发性硬化症病耻感测量方法,并确定多发性硬化症病耻感的轨迹和因果动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stigma and health outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
Stigma is increasingly recognised as contributing to disability in MS. This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: To what extent is stigma associated with psychological and physical health outcomes in MS? The inclusion criteria were: scientific publication of original quantitative research in adults with MS and/or Clinically Isolated Syndrome; outcome measures including a measurement of stigma and psychological and/or physical health; peer reviewed articles in the English language. Pubmed, PsycINFO and Science Direct were searched in November 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in all of the identified studies. The following data was extracted: (1) author and publication year, (2) country, (3) design, (4) sample size and demographics, (5) stigma measure, (6) psychological and/or physical health outcomes, 8) key findings. 18 Studies were identified, reporting in total 22,021 adult participants with multiple sclerosis, with individual sample sizes ranging from 33 to 6,670. The review consistently identified stigma to be significantly associated with adverse psychological and physical health outcomes in all 18 identified studies. Over half of all identified studies investigated depression and stigma and over half investigated quality of life and stigma, and a significant association was demonstrated for both of these variables with stigma in all of these studies. Limitations are that most studies were Western with primarily white participants. Only variables studied could be reported and therefore only a selective perspective of stigma in MS could be explored. A meta-analysis was not feasible, due to the variety of stigma definitions and measures employed. A model of stigma in MS is presented and possible interventions to manage stigma in MS are discussed. A need for international action to develop a consensus measure of MS stigma and determine the trajectory and causal dynamics of MS stigma is highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for puncture-related complications after cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention with distal transradial approach. Osmotic demyelination syndrome: revisiting the diagnostic criteria through two fatal cases. Exploring the appropriate situation of performing CSF mNGS in patients with proposed intracranial infections. Intradural extramedullary cystic lesions: an interesting cauda equina cysticercosis case report and a literature review. Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy caused by an ALDH7A1 mutation in an infant girl: the first case report in Syria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1