{"title":"偏头痛发作间期负担的预测因素:主观记忆抱怨的隐性作用","authors":"Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins","doi":"10.1111/head.14819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints\",\"authors\":\"Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 "偏头痛发作间期负担"(MIB)是一个新概念,包括偏头痛发作间期疾病的总体影响。本研究旨在确定偏头痛患者发作间期负担的解释因素。方法这项前瞻性横断面观察包括 200 名偏头痛患者(92% [n = 184] 为女性,平均 [标准差] 年龄为 44.结果 四分之三以上(76% [n = 152])的患者有中度至重度发作间期负担。较高的发作间期负担(MIB量表≥2)与较高的头痛频率(8 vs. 14,p = 0.001)和强度(头痛指数得分 17.0 vs. 30.0,p = 0.002)、较高的头痛影响(六项头痛影响测试得分 59.2 vs. 63.9,p = 0.001)、更多的主观记忆抱怨(主观记忆抱怨问卷 [SMC] 得分 9.0 vs. 4.5,p = 0.001)以及焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)-焦虑得分 5 vs. 10,p <0.001)和抑郁症状(HADS-抑郁得分 5 vs. 8,p <0.001)。一旦考虑到这些潜在的解释变量,主观记忆主诉和发作期头痛的影响仍是发作间期负担的单独决定因素,SMC可解释15%的发作间期负担(几率比1.15,95%置信区间1.03-1.28;p = 0.010)。
Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints
BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [n = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [n = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [n = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, p = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, p = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, p = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, p = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, p < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, p < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; p = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.
期刊介绍:
Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.