偏头痛发作间期负担的预测因素:主观记忆抱怨的隐性作用

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1111/head.14819
Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins
{"title":"偏头痛发作间期负担的预测因素:主观记忆抱怨的隐性作用","authors":"Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins","doi":"10.1111/head.14819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints\",\"authors\":\"Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 "偏头痛发作间期负担"(MIB)是一个新概念,包括偏头痛发作间期疾病的总体影响。本研究旨在确定偏头痛患者发作间期负担的解释因素。方法这项前瞻性横断面观察包括 200 名偏头痛患者(92% [n = 184] 为女性,平均 [标准差] 年龄为 44.结果 四分之三以上(76% [n = 152])的患者有中度至重度发作间期负担。较高的发作间期负担(MIB量表≥2)与较高的头痛频率(8 vs. 14,p = 0.001)和强度(头痛指数得分 17.0 vs. 30.0,p = 0.002)、较高的头痛影响(六项头痛影响测试得分 59.2 vs. 63.9,p = 0.001)、更多的主观记忆抱怨(主观记忆抱怨问卷 [SMC] 得分 9.0 vs. 4.5,p = 0.001)以及焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)-焦虑得分 5 vs. 10,p <0.001)和抑郁症状(HADS-抑郁得分 5 vs. 8,p <0.001)。一旦考虑到这些潜在的解释变量,主观记忆主诉和发作期头痛的影响仍是发作间期负担的单独决定因素,SMC可解释15%的发作间期负担(几率比1.15,95%置信区间1.03-1.28;p = 0.010)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints
BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [n = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [n = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [n = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, p = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, p = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, p = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, p = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, p < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, p < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; p = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1