巴利昔尼对难治性类风湿关节炎患者是否有效、安全?与非难治类风湿关节炎 RA 组的比较数据。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1159/000541488
Ali Ekin,Salim Misirci,Ahmet Görünen,Belkis Nihan Coskun,Burcu Yagiz,Ediz Dalkilic,Yavuz Pehlivan
{"title":"巴利昔尼对难治性类风湿关节炎患者是否有效、安全?与非难治类风湿关节炎 RA 组的比较数据。","authors":"Ali Ekin,Salim Misirci,Ahmet Görünen,Belkis Nihan Coskun,Burcu Yagiz,Ediz Dalkilic,Yavuz Pehlivan","doi":"10.1159/000541488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study investigates the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral targeted synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD), in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) compared to those without, aiming to determine its potential as an alternative treatment for D2T RA.\r\n\r\nSUBJECT AND METHODS\r\nA total of 78 patients participated in this retrospective cohort study, with 33 meeting the D2T RA criteria and 45 were in the non-D2T RA group. Various clinical and laboratory parameters, adverse events, and disease activity indices were assessed, alongside drug efficacy and survival rates.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPatients with D2T RA exhibited higher seronegativity, prior use of bDMARDs and cDMARDs, and longer disease duration. Both groups experienced reductions in VAS and DAS28 scores, as well as SDAI, CDAI, HAQ, CRP, and ESR levels at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-baricitinib initiation, with sustained efficacy observed over 12 months. The most prevalent adverse event was infection (28.21%). Although initial drug survival rates were similar between groups, the non-D2T RA group demonstrated higher rates at 24 months (46.70% vs. 59.40%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable survival rates between D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups, whether treated with baricitinib alone or in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nDespite potential treatment resistance, patients meeting the D2T RA criteria shared similar safety and efficacy profiles with those non-D2T RA. Baricitinib emerges as a promising treatment option for D2T RA patients, offering effectiveness and safety comparable to the non-D2T RA group.","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":"75 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Baricitinib Effective and Safe for Patients with Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis? Comparative Data with the RA Group of Rheumatoid Arthritis not Difficult to Treat.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ekin,Salim Misirci,Ahmet Görünen,Belkis Nihan Coskun,Burcu Yagiz,Ediz Dalkilic,Yavuz Pehlivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study investigates the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral targeted synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD), in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) compared to those without, aiming to determine its potential as an alternative treatment for D2T RA.\\r\\n\\r\\nSUBJECT AND METHODS\\r\\nA total of 78 patients participated in this retrospective cohort study, with 33 meeting the D2T RA criteria and 45 were in the non-D2T RA group. Various clinical and laboratory parameters, adverse events, and disease activity indices were assessed, alongside drug efficacy and survival rates.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nPatients with D2T RA exhibited higher seronegativity, prior use of bDMARDs and cDMARDs, and longer disease duration. Both groups experienced reductions in VAS and DAS28 scores, as well as SDAI, CDAI, HAQ, CRP, and ESR levels at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-baricitinib initiation, with sustained efficacy observed over 12 months. The most prevalent adverse event was infection (28.21%). Although initial drug survival rates were similar between groups, the non-D2T RA group demonstrated higher rates at 24 months (46.70% vs. 59.40%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable survival rates between D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups, whether treated with baricitinib alone or in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nDespite potential treatment resistance, patients meeting the D2T RA criteria shared similar safety and efficacy profiles with those non-D2T RA. Baricitinib emerges as a promising treatment option for D2T RA patients, offering effectiveness and safety comparable to the non-D2T RA group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541488\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究调查了巴利替尼(一种口服靶向合成改良抗风湿药物(DMARD))在难治性类风湿性关节炎(D2T RA)患者与非难治性类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性,旨在确定其作为D2T RA替代治疗方法的潜力。结果D2T RA患者血清阴性率较高,曾使用过bDMARDs和cDMARDs,病程较长。两组患者的VAS和DAS28评分以及SDAI、CDAI、HAQ、CRP和ESR水平在基线和开始使用巴利替尼后的3、6和12个月都有所下降,疗效持续了12个月。最常见的不良事件是感染(28.21%)。虽然各组的初始药物存活率相似,但非D2T RA组在24个月后的存活率更高(46.70%对59.40%)。亚组分析表明,无论是单用巴利昔尼治疗,还是与甲氨蝶呤或来氟米特联合治疗,D2T RA 组和非 D2T RA 组的存活率相当。巴利替尼有望成为D2T RA患者的治疗选择,其有效性和安全性与非D2T RA组相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Baricitinib Effective and Safe for Patients with Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis? Comparative Data with the RA Group of Rheumatoid Arthritis not Difficult to Treat.
OBJECTIVE This study investigates the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral targeted synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD), in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) compared to those without, aiming to determine its potential as an alternative treatment for D2T RA. SUBJECT AND METHODS A total of 78 patients participated in this retrospective cohort study, with 33 meeting the D2T RA criteria and 45 were in the non-D2T RA group. Various clinical and laboratory parameters, adverse events, and disease activity indices were assessed, alongside drug efficacy and survival rates. RESULTS Patients with D2T RA exhibited higher seronegativity, prior use of bDMARDs and cDMARDs, and longer disease duration. Both groups experienced reductions in VAS and DAS28 scores, as well as SDAI, CDAI, HAQ, CRP, and ESR levels at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-baricitinib initiation, with sustained efficacy observed over 12 months. The most prevalent adverse event was infection (28.21%). Although initial drug survival rates were similar between groups, the non-D2T RA group demonstrated higher rates at 24 months (46.70% vs. 59.40%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable survival rates between D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups, whether treated with baricitinib alone or in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide. CONCLUSION Despite potential treatment resistance, patients meeting the D2T RA criteria shared similar safety and efficacy profiles with those non-D2T RA. Baricitinib emerges as a promising treatment option for D2T RA patients, offering effectiveness and safety comparable to the non-D2T RA group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Sublethal Disinfectant Exposure on Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Anti-Elixir Triad: Non-Synced Circadian Rhythm, Gut Dysbiosis and Telomeric Damage. Systemic Statin Use and Pulp Chamber Calcification: A Pilot Retrospective Case Control Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Endoplasmic Reticular Stress and Pathogenesis of Experimental Colitis: Mechanism of Action of 5-Amino Salicylic Acid. Relative Importance of Defined Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Antigens in the T Cell Recognition Repertoire of Latently Infected Individuals not Progressing to Active Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1