射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者的右心室功和肺毛细血管楔压

Kuan-Chih Huang, Ting-Tse Lin, Cho-Kai Wu, Lung-Chun Lin, Lian-Yu Lin
{"title":"射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者的右心室功和肺毛细血管楔压","authors":"Kuan-Chih Huang, Ting-Tse Lin, Cho-Kai Wu, Lung-Chun Lin, Lian-Yu Lin","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSymptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are closely related to elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise. Understanding right ventricular (RV) myocardial work, using RV pressure–strain loops to assess RV function in HFpEF, is lacking. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of right ventricular myocardial work parameters in diagnosing HFpEF and their correlation with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise.\nMethods\nThe study included patients who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests, measuring pressures at rest and during exercise to identify HFpEF. Echocardiography assessed left and right ventricular parameters. RV myocardial work was calculated using strain-rate and pressure curves, matched with ECG data. RV global constructive work (RV GCW), RV global work index (RV GWI), RV global wasted work (RV GWW), and RV global work efficiency (RV GWE) were analyzed and compared with invasively measured PCWP at rest and peak exercise. Results\nForty-one patients with adequate data were enrolled, with 21 diagnosed with HFpEF. No significant differences in various echocardiographic parameters were found between HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups, except higher post-exercise PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients had higher RV GWW and lower RV GWE. RV GWW and RV GWE had higher predictive ability for HFpEF diagnosis compared to other echocardiographic parameters. RV GCW (r = 0.504, P = 0.001) and RV GWW (r = 0.621, P < 0.001) correlated with post-exercise ΔPCWP and exercise PCWP, with RV GWW independently associated with both after adjustment for confounding factors.\nConclusions\nRV GWW is a novel predictive parameter that provides a better explanation of RV performance regarding post-exercise ΔPCWP than other standard echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction\",\"authors\":\"Kuan-Chih Huang, Ting-Tse Lin, Cho-Kai Wu, Lung-Chun Lin, Lian-Yu Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nSymptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are closely related to elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise. Understanding right ventricular (RV) myocardial work, using RV pressure–strain loops to assess RV function in HFpEF, is lacking. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of right ventricular myocardial work parameters in diagnosing HFpEF and their correlation with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise.\\nMethods\\nThe study included patients who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests, measuring pressures at rest and during exercise to identify HFpEF. Echocardiography assessed left and right ventricular parameters. RV myocardial work was calculated using strain-rate and pressure curves, matched with ECG data. RV global constructive work (RV GCW), RV global work index (RV GWI), RV global wasted work (RV GWW), and RV global work efficiency (RV GWE) were analyzed and compared with invasively measured PCWP at rest and peak exercise. Results\\nForty-one patients with adequate data were enrolled, with 21 diagnosed with HFpEF. No significant differences in various echocardiographic parameters were found between HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups, except higher post-exercise PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients had higher RV GWW and lower RV GWE. RV GWW and RV GWE had higher predictive ability for HFpEF diagnosis compared to other echocardiographic parameters. RV GCW (r = 0.504, P = 0.001) and RV GWW (r = 0.621, P < 0.001) correlated with post-exercise ΔPCWP and exercise PCWP, with RV GWW independently associated with both after adjustment for confounding factors.\\nConclusions\\nRV GWW is a novel predictive parameter that provides a better explanation of RV performance regarding post-exercise ΔPCWP than other standard echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)的症状与运动时肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)升高密切相关。利用右心室压力-应变环路评估 HFpEF 中的右心室功能,了解右心室(RV)的心肌功还很缺乏。该研究旨在评估右心室心肌功参数在诊断 HFpEF 中的有效性及其与运动时肺毛细血管楔压的相关性。研究纳入了接受有创心肺运动测试的患者,通过测量静息时和运动时的压力来确定 HFpEF。超声心动图评估左心室和右心室参数。利用应变率和压力曲线计算心室收缩力,并与心电图数据相匹配。分析了 RV 整体建设性功(RV GCW)、RV 整体功指数(RV GWI)、RV 整体功浪费(RV GWW)和 RV 整体功效率(RV GWE),并与有创测量的静息和运动高峰 PCWP 进行了比较。结果41名有足够数据的患者被纳入研究,其中21人被诊断为高频低氧血症。除了 HFpEF 患者运动后 PCWP 和平均肺动脉压较高外,HFpEF 组和非 HFpEF 组的各种超声心动图参数无明显差异。HFpEF 患者的 RV GWW 较高,RV GWE 较低。与其他超声心动图参数相比,RV GWW 和 RV GWE 对 HFpEF 诊断具有更高的预测能力。RV GCW(r = 0.504,P = 0.001)和 RV GWW(r = 0.621,P <0.001)与运动后 ΔPCWP 和运动 PCWP 相关,在调整了混杂因素后,RV GWW 与两者均独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Background Symptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are closely related to elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise. Understanding right ventricular (RV) myocardial work, using RV pressure–strain loops to assess RV function in HFpEF, is lacking. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of right ventricular myocardial work parameters in diagnosing HFpEF and their correlation with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise. Methods The study included patients who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests, measuring pressures at rest and during exercise to identify HFpEF. Echocardiography assessed left and right ventricular parameters. RV myocardial work was calculated using strain-rate and pressure curves, matched with ECG data. RV global constructive work (RV GCW), RV global work index (RV GWI), RV global wasted work (RV GWW), and RV global work efficiency (RV GWE) were analyzed and compared with invasively measured PCWP at rest and peak exercise. Results Forty-one patients with adequate data were enrolled, with 21 diagnosed with HFpEF. No significant differences in various echocardiographic parameters were found between HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups, except higher post-exercise PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients had higher RV GWW and lower RV GWE. RV GWW and RV GWE had higher predictive ability for HFpEF diagnosis compared to other echocardiographic parameters. RV GCW (r = 0.504, P = 0.001) and RV GWW (r = 0.621, P < 0.001) correlated with post-exercise ΔPCWP and exercise PCWP, with RV GWW independently associated with both after adjustment for confounding factors. Conclusions RV GWW is a novel predictive parameter that provides a better explanation of RV performance regarding post-exercise ΔPCWP than other standard echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Adults with Heart Failure Die: Insights from the CDC-WONDER Database A longitudinal study of depressive symptom trajectories and risk factors in congestive heart failure Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Association Between Life's Essential 8 and Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Adults: Insights from NHANES 2007-2018 Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1