关于评估和管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者心肺风险的多专业德尔菲共识

Mohit Bhutani, Jean Bourbeau, Shaun G Goodman, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Alan G Kaplan, Peter James Lin, Erika Dianne Penz, Subodh Verma, Shelley Zieroth
{"title":"关于评估和管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者心肺风险的多专业德尔菲共识","authors":"Mohit Bhutani, Jean Bourbeau, Shaun G Goodman, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Alan G Kaplan, Peter James Lin, Erika Dianne Penz, Subodh Verma, Shelley Zieroth","doi":"10.2147/copd.s471952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> In Canada, COPD represents a significant burden to the patient and health system, as it is often under or misdiagnosed and sub-optimally treated. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common co-morbidity in COPD and there is significant interplay between these two chronic conditions. Across all stages of COPD disease severity, deaths can be attributed not only to respiratory causes but also to cardiovascular-related factors. The established links between COPD and CVD suggest the need for a greater degree of collaboration between respirologists and cardiologists. This modified Delphi consensus was initiated to consider how optimal COPD care can be delivered within Canada, with specific consideration of reducing cardiopulmonary risk and outcomes in COPD patients.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A steering group with interest in the management of COPD and CVD from primary care, cardiology, and respirology identified 40 statements formed from four key themes. A 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was sent to healthcare professionals working in COPD across Canada by an independent third party to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 100 responses were received from respirologists (n=30), cardiologists (n=30), and primary care physicians (n=40). Consensus was very strong (≥ 90%) in 28 (70%) statements, strong (≥ 75 and &lt; 90%) in 7 (17.5%) statements and was not achieved (&lt; 75%) in 5 (12.5%) of statements.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the consensus scores, 9 key recommendations were proposed by the steering group. These focus on the need to comprehensively risk stratify and manage COPD patients to help prevent exacerbations. Consensus within this study provides a call to action for the expeditious implementation of the latest COPD guidelines from the Canadian Thoracic Society.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":13792,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD\",\"authors\":\"Mohit Bhutani, Jean Bourbeau, Shaun G Goodman, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Alan G Kaplan, Peter James Lin, Erika Dianne Penz, Subodh Verma, Shelley Zieroth\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/copd.s471952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> In Canada, COPD represents a significant burden to the patient and health system, as it is often under or misdiagnosed and sub-optimally treated. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common co-morbidity in COPD and there is significant interplay between these two chronic conditions. Across all stages of COPD disease severity, deaths can be attributed not only to respiratory causes but also to cardiovascular-related factors. The established links between COPD and CVD suggest the need for a greater degree of collaboration between respirologists and cardiologists. This modified Delphi consensus was initiated to consider how optimal COPD care can be delivered within Canada, with specific consideration of reducing cardiopulmonary risk and outcomes in COPD patients.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A steering group with interest in the management of COPD and CVD from primary care, cardiology, and respirology identified 40 statements formed from four key themes. A 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was sent to healthcare professionals working in COPD across Canada by an independent third party to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 100 responses were received from respirologists (n=30), cardiologists (n=30), and primary care physicians (n=40). Consensus was very strong (≥ 90%) in 28 (70%) statements, strong (≥ 75 and &lt; 90%) in 7 (17.5%) statements and was not achieved (&lt; 75%) in 5 (12.5%) of statements.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the consensus scores, 9 key recommendations were proposed by the steering group. These focus on the need to comprehensively risk stratify and manage COPD patients to help prevent exacerbations. Consensus within this study provides a call to action for the expeditious implementation of the latest COPD guidelines from the Canadian Thoracic Society.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s471952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s471952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在加拿大,慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)给患者和医疗系统带来了沉重负担,因为该病往往诊断不足或误诊,治疗效果也不够理想。心血管疾病(CVD)是慢性阻塞性肺病的常见并发症,这两种慢性疾病之间存在显著的相互作用。在慢性阻塞性肺病疾病严重程度的各个阶段,死亡不仅可归因于呼吸系统原因,也可归因于心血管相关因素。慢性阻塞性肺病和心血管疾病之间的既定联系表明,呼吸科医生和心脏病医生之间需要加强合作。这项修改后的德尔菲共识旨在考虑如何在加拿大提供最佳的慢性阻塞性肺病治疗,特别是考虑降低慢性阻塞性肺病患者的心肺风险和治疗效果:来自初级保健、心脏病学和呼吸内科的 COPD 和心血管疾病管理指导小组确定了由四个关键主题组成的 40 项声明。由独立第三方向加拿大各地从事慢性阻塞性肺病工作的医护人员发送了一份 4 点李克特量表问卷,以评估他们对这些声明的同意程度(共识)。如果≥75%的受访者同意某项陈述,则定义为 "高度一致";如果≥90%的受访者同意某项陈述,则定义为 "非常一致":共收到来自呼吸科医生(30 人)、心脏病医生(30 人)和初级保健医生(40 人)的 100 份回复。28项(70%)陈述的共识度非常高(≥90%),7项(17.5%)陈述的共识度较高(≥75%和< 90%),5项(12.5%)陈述的共识度未达到(< 75%):根据共识得分,指导小组提出了 9 项主要建议。这些建议的重点是需要对慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行全面的风险分层和管理,以帮助预防病情恶化。这项研究中达成的共识为尽快实施加拿大胸科学会最新的慢性阻塞性肺病指南提供了行动号召。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD
Background: In Canada, COPD represents a significant burden to the patient and health system, as it is often under or misdiagnosed and sub-optimally treated. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common co-morbidity in COPD and there is significant interplay between these two chronic conditions. Across all stages of COPD disease severity, deaths can be attributed not only to respiratory causes but also to cardiovascular-related factors. The established links between COPD and CVD suggest the need for a greater degree of collaboration between respirologists and cardiologists. This modified Delphi consensus was initiated to consider how optimal COPD care can be delivered within Canada, with specific consideration of reducing cardiopulmonary risk and outcomes in COPD patients.
Methods: A steering group with interest in the management of COPD and CVD from primary care, cardiology, and respirology identified 40 statements formed from four key themes. A 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was sent to healthcare professionals working in COPD across Canada by an independent third party to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement.
Results: A total of 100 responses were received from respirologists (n=30), cardiologists (n=30), and primary care physicians (n=40). Consensus was very strong (≥ 90%) in 28 (70%) statements, strong (≥ 75 and < 90%) in 7 (17.5%) statements and was not achieved (< 75%) in 5 (12.5%) of statements.
Conclusion: Based on the consensus scores, 9 key recommendations were proposed by the steering group. These focus on the need to comprehensively risk stratify and manage COPD patients to help prevent exacerbations. Consensus within this study provides a call to action for the expeditious implementation of the latest COPD guidelines from the Canadian Thoracic Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD A Network Meta-Analysis of Aerobic, Resistance, Endurance, and High-Intensity Interval Training to Prioritize Exercise for Stable COPD Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure and in-Hospital Mortality Among Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study The Relationship Between Benefit Finding and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Mediating Effects of Self-Management Exploring Gender Differences in the Association Between TyG Index and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study from NHANES 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1