{"title":"晶格玻尔兹曼颜色梯度模型中的润湿和压力梯度性能","authors":"M. Sedahmed, R. C. V. Coelho","doi":"10.1063/5.0228835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accurate implementation of wetting and pressure drop is crucial to correctly reproduce fluid displacement processes in porous media. Although several strategies have been proposed in the literature, a systematic comparison of them is needed to determine the most suitable for practical applications. Here, we carried out numerical simulations to investigate the performance of two widely used wettability schemes in the lattice Boltzmann color gradient model, namely, the geometrical wetting scheme by Leclaire et al. [Phys. Rev. E 95(3), 033306 (2017)](scheme-I) and the modified direction of the color gradient scheme by Akai et al. [Adv. Water Resour. 116, 56–66 (2018)] (scheme-II). We showed that scheme-II was more accurate in simulating static contact angles of a fluid droplet on a solid surface. However, scheme-I was more accurate in simulating a dynamic case of a binary fluid flow in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. Moreover, we investigated the performance of two popular pressure gradient implementation types. Type-I used the so-called Zou–He pressure boundary conditions at the inlet and the outlet of the domain, while type-II used an external body force as a pressure gradient. We showed that the type-I implementation was slightly more accurate in simulating a neutrally wetting fluid in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. We also investigated the differences between the two types of pressure gradient implementation in simulating two fluid displacement processes in a Bentheimer sandstone rock sample: the primary drainage and the imbibition displacement processes.","PeriodicalId":20066,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wetting and pressure gradient performance in a lattice Boltzmann color gradient model\",\"authors\":\"M. Sedahmed, R. C. V. Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0228835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An accurate implementation of wetting and pressure drop is crucial to correctly reproduce fluid displacement processes in porous media. Although several strategies have been proposed in the literature, a systematic comparison of them is needed to determine the most suitable for practical applications. Here, we carried out numerical simulations to investigate the performance of two widely used wettability schemes in the lattice Boltzmann color gradient model, namely, the geometrical wetting scheme by Leclaire et al. [Phys. Rev. E 95(3), 033306 (2017)](scheme-I) and the modified direction of the color gradient scheme by Akai et al. [Adv. Water Resour. 116, 56–66 (2018)] (scheme-II). We showed that scheme-II was more accurate in simulating static contact angles of a fluid droplet on a solid surface. However, scheme-I was more accurate in simulating a dynamic case of a binary fluid flow in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. Moreover, we investigated the performance of two popular pressure gradient implementation types. Type-I used the so-called Zou–He pressure boundary conditions at the inlet and the outlet of the domain, while type-II used an external body force as a pressure gradient. We showed that the type-I implementation was slightly more accurate in simulating a neutrally wetting fluid in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. We also investigated the differences between the two types of pressure gradient implementation in simulating two fluid displacement processes in a Bentheimer sandstone rock sample: the primary drainage and the imbibition displacement processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of Fluids\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228835\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
要正确再现多孔介质中的流体位移过程,准确实现润湿和压降至关重要。虽然文献中已经提出了几种策略,但需要对它们进行系统比较,以确定最适合实际应用的策略。在此,我们进行了数值模拟,研究了晶格玻尔兹曼颜色梯度模型中两种广泛使用的润湿方案的性能,即 Leclaire 等人的几何润湿方案[Phys. Rev. E 95(3), 033306 (2017)](方案-I)和 Akai 等人的颜色梯度修正方向方案[Adv. Water Resour. 116, 56-66 (2018)](方案-II)。我们的研究表明,方案-II 在模拟流体液滴在固体表面的静态接触角方面更为精确。然而,在模拟由瓦什伯恩方程描述的二元流体在水平毛细管中流动的动态情况时,方案一更为精确。此外,我们还研究了两种常用压力梯度实施类型的性能。类型 I 在域的入口和出口处使用了所谓的 Zou-He 压力边界条件,而类型 II 则使用了外部体力作为压力梯度。我们发现,在模拟由瓦什伯恩方程描述的水平毛细管中的中性润湿流体时,I 型实施方案的精确度略高。我们还研究了在模拟本特海默砂岩岩石样本中的两种流体位移过程(原生排水和浸润位移过程)时,两种压力梯度实现方式之间的差异。
Wetting and pressure gradient performance in a lattice Boltzmann color gradient model
An accurate implementation of wetting and pressure drop is crucial to correctly reproduce fluid displacement processes in porous media. Although several strategies have been proposed in the literature, a systematic comparison of them is needed to determine the most suitable for practical applications. Here, we carried out numerical simulations to investigate the performance of two widely used wettability schemes in the lattice Boltzmann color gradient model, namely, the geometrical wetting scheme by Leclaire et al. [Phys. Rev. E 95(3), 033306 (2017)](scheme-I) and the modified direction of the color gradient scheme by Akai et al. [Adv. Water Resour. 116, 56–66 (2018)] (scheme-II). We showed that scheme-II was more accurate in simulating static contact angles of a fluid droplet on a solid surface. However, scheme-I was more accurate in simulating a dynamic case of a binary fluid flow in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. Moreover, we investigated the performance of two popular pressure gradient implementation types. Type-I used the so-called Zou–He pressure boundary conditions at the inlet and the outlet of the domain, while type-II used an external body force as a pressure gradient. We showed that the type-I implementation was slightly more accurate in simulating a neutrally wetting fluid in a horizontal capillary tube described by the Washburn equation. We also investigated the differences between the two types of pressure gradient implementation in simulating two fluid displacement processes in a Bentheimer sandstone rock sample: the primary drainage and the imbibition displacement processes.
期刊介绍:
Physics of Fluids (PoF) is a preeminent journal devoted to publishing original theoretical, computational, and experimental contributions to the understanding of the dynamics of gases, liquids, and complex or multiphase fluids. Topics published in PoF are diverse and reflect the most important subjects in fluid dynamics, including, but not limited to:
-Acoustics
-Aerospace and aeronautical flow
-Astrophysical flow
-Biofluid mechanics
-Cavitation and cavitating flows
-Combustion flows
-Complex fluids
-Compressible flow
-Computational fluid dynamics
-Contact lines
-Continuum mechanics
-Convection
-Cryogenic flow
-Droplets
-Electrical and magnetic effects in fluid flow
-Foam, bubble, and film mechanics
-Flow control
-Flow instability and transition
-Flow orientation and anisotropy
-Flows with other transport phenomena
-Flows with complex boundary conditions
-Flow visualization
-Fluid mechanics
-Fluid physical properties
-Fluid–structure interactions
-Free surface flows
-Geophysical flow
-Interfacial flow
-Knudsen flow
-Laminar flow
-Liquid crystals
-Mathematics of fluids
-Micro- and nanofluid mechanics
-Mixing
-Molecular theory
-Nanofluidics
-Particulate, multiphase, and granular flow
-Processing flows
-Relativistic fluid mechanics
-Rotating flows
-Shock wave phenomena
-Soft matter
-Stratified flows
-Supercritical fluids
-Superfluidity
-Thermodynamics of flow systems
-Transonic flow
-Turbulent flow
-Viscous and non-Newtonian flow
-Viscoelasticity
-Vortex dynamics
-Waves