大型语言模型对开源创新的影响:来自 GitHub Copilot 的证据

Doron Yeverechyahu, Raveesh Mayya, Gal Oestreicher-Singer
{"title":"大型语言模型对开源创新的影响:来自 GitHub Copilot 的证据","authors":"Doron Yeverechyahu, Raveesh Mayya, Gal Oestreicher-Singer","doi":"arxiv-2409.08379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative AI (GenAI) has been shown to enhance individual productivity in a\nguided setting. While it is also likely to transform processes in a\ncollaborative work setting, it is unclear what trajectory this transformation\nwill follow. Collaborative environment is characterized by a blend of\norigination tasks that involve building something from scratch and iteration\ntasks that involve refining on others' work. Whether GenAI affects these two\naspects of collaborative work and to what extent is an open empirical question.\nWe study this question within the open-source development landscape, a prime\nexample of collaborative innovation, where contributions are voluntary and\nunguided. Specifically, we focus on the launch of GitHub Copilot in October\n2021 and leverage a natural experiment in which GitHub Copilot (a\nprogramming-focused LLM) selectively rolled out support for Python, but not for\nR. We observe a significant jump in overall contributions, suggesting that\nGenAI effectively augments collaborative innovation in an unguided setting.\nInterestingly, Copilot's launch increased maintenance-related contributions,\nwhich are mostly iterative tasks involving building on others' work,\nsignificantly more than code-development contributions, which are mostly\norigination tasks involving standalone contributions. This disparity was\nexacerbated in active projects with extensive coding activity, raising concerns\nthat, as GenAI models improve to accommodate richer context, the gap between\norigination and iterative solutions may widen. We discuss practical and policy\nimplications to incentivize high-value innovative solutions.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Large Language Models on Open-source Innovation: Evidence from GitHub Copilot\",\"authors\":\"Doron Yeverechyahu, Raveesh Mayya, Gal Oestreicher-Singer\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generative AI (GenAI) has been shown to enhance individual productivity in a\\nguided setting. While it is also likely to transform processes in a\\ncollaborative work setting, it is unclear what trajectory this transformation\\nwill follow. Collaborative environment is characterized by a blend of\\norigination tasks that involve building something from scratch and iteration\\ntasks that involve refining on others' work. Whether GenAI affects these two\\naspects of collaborative work and to what extent is an open empirical question.\\nWe study this question within the open-source development landscape, a prime\\nexample of collaborative innovation, where contributions are voluntary and\\nunguided. Specifically, we focus on the launch of GitHub Copilot in October\\n2021 and leverage a natural experiment in which GitHub Copilot (a\\nprogramming-focused LLM) selectively rolled out support for Python, but not for\\nR. We observe a significant jump in overall contributions, suggesting that\\nGenAI effectively augments collaborative innovation in an unguided setting.\\nInterestingly, Copilot's launch increased maintenance-related contributions,\\nwhich are mostly iterative tasks involving building on others' work,\\nsignificantly more than code-development contributions, which are mostly\\norigination tasks involving standalone contributions. This disparity was\\nexacerbated in active projects with extensive coding activity, raising concerns\\nthat, as GenAI models improve to accommodate richer context, the gap between\\norigination and iterative solutions may widen. We discuss practical and policy\\nimplications to incentivize high-value innovative solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)已被证明可以提高引导环境下的个人生产力。虽然它也有可能改变协作式工作环境中的流程,但目前还不清楚这种转变会遵循怎样的轨迹。协作环境的特点是融合了涉及从头开始构建的原创任务和涉及完善他人工作的迭代任务。GenAI 是否会影响协作工作的这两个方面以及影响程度如何,是一个开放的实证问题。我们在开源开发环境中研究了这个问题,开源开发是协作创新的一个主要范例,在这种环境中,贡献是自愿的,没有指导。具体来说,我们关注 2021 年 10 月 GitHub Copilot 的发布,并利用一个自然实验,即 GitHub Copilot(专注于编程的 LLM)有选择性地推出对 Python 的支持,而不是对 R 的支持。有趣的是,Copilot 的推出增加了与维护相关的贡献,这主要是涉及在他人工作基础上进行迭代的任务,而代码开发贡献则主要是涉及独立贡献的原创任务。随着 GenAI 模型不断改进以适应更丰富的环境,这种差距可能会扩大。我们讨论了激励高价值创新解决方案的实用性和政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Large Language Models on Open-source Innovation: Evidence from GitHub Copilot
Generative AI (GenAI) has been shown to enhance individual productivity in a guided setting. While it is also likely to transform processes in a collaborative work setting, it is unclear what trajectory this transformation will follow. Collaborative environment is characterized by a blend of origination tasks that involve building something from scratch and iteration tasks that involve refining on others' work. Whether GenAI affects these two aspects of collaborative work and to what extent is an open empirical question. We study this question within the open-source development landscape, a prime example of collaborative innovation, where contributions are voluntary and unguided. Specifically, we focus on the launch of GitHub Copilot in October 2021 and leverage a natural experiment in which GitHub Copilot (a programming-focused LLM) selectively rolled out support for Python, but not for R. We observe a significant jump in overall contributions, suggesting that GenAI effectively augments collaborative innovation in an unguided setting. Interestingly, Copilot's launch increased maintenance-related contributions, which are mostly iterative tasks involving building on others' work, significantly more than code-development contributions, which are mostly origination tasks involving standalone contributions. This disparity was exacerbated in active projects with extensive coding activity, raising concerns that, as GenAI models improve to accommodate richer context, the gap between origination and iterative solutions may widen. We discuss practical and policy implications to incentivize high-value innovative solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It depends: Varieties of defining growth dependence Experimental Evidence That Conversational Artificial Intelligence Can Steer Consumer Behavior Without Detection Cognitive Hierarchy in Day-to-day Network Flow Dynamics The long-term human capital and health impacts of a pollution reduction programme What Does ChatGPT Make of Historical Stock Returns? Extrapolation and Miscalibration in LLM Stock Return Forecasts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1