不同厚度工件的钻孔残余应力测量验证

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Experimental Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4
M. C. Lakey, M. R. Hill
{"title":"不同厚度工件的钻孔残余应力测量验证","authors":"M. C. Lakey,&nbsp;M. R. Hill","doi":"10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A recent revision to the ASTM E837 standard for near-surface residual stress measurement by the hole-drilling method describes a new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure applicable to “thin” and “intermediate” workpieces for which strain versus depth response depends on workpiece thickness. This new calculation procedure differs from that of the prior standard, which applies only to thick workpieces with strain versus depth response independent of thickness.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>Herein we assess the new calculation procedures by performing hole-drilling residual stress measurements in samples with a range of thickness.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Near-surface residual stress is measured in a thick aluminum plate containing near-surface residual stress from a uniform shot peening treatment, and in samples of different thickness removed from the plate at the peened surface. A finite element (FE) model is used to assess consistency between measured residual stress across the range of sample thickness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Measured residual stress varies with sample thickness, with thinner samples exhibiting smaller near-surface compressive stress and a larger gradient of subsurface stress. These trends are consistent with both observed bending (curvature) of the removed samples and the trend in FE-calculated expected residual stress. The measured and expected residual stresses are in good agreement for samples of intermediate thickness, but the agreement decreases with sample thickness. Measured residual stress is invariant with gage circle diameter.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure for hole-drilling provides meaningful improvement compared to thick-workpiece calculations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"64 9","pages":"1529 - 1544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurements in Workpieces of Various Thickness\",\"authors\":\"M. C. Lakey,&nbsp;M. R. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A recent revision to the ASTM E837 standard for near-surface residual stress measurement by the hole-drilling method describes a new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure applicable to “thin” and “intermediate” workpieces for which strain versus depth response depends on workpiece thickness. This new calculation procedure differs from that of the prior standard, which applies only to thick workpieces with strain versus depth response independent of thickness.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>Herein we assess the new calculation procedures by performing hole-drilling residual stress measurements in samples with a range of thickness.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Near-surface residual stress is measured in a thick aluminum plate containing near-surface residual stress from a uniform shot peening treatment, and in samples of different thickness removed from the plate at the peened surface. A finite element (FE) model is used to assess consistency between measured residual stress across the range of sample thickness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Measured residual stress varies with sample thickness, with thinner samples exhibiting smaller near-surface compressive stress and a larger gradient of subsurface stress. These trends are consistent with both observed bending (curvature) of the removed samples and the trend in FE-calculated expected residual stress. The measured and expected residual stresses are in good agreement for samples of intermediate thickness, but the agreement decreases with sample thickness. Measured residual stress is invariant with gage circle diameter.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure for hole-drilling provides meaningful improvement compared to thick-workpiece calculations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"64 9\",\"pages\":\"1529 - 1544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-024-01107-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景最近对 ASTM E837 钻孔法近表面残余应力测量标准进行了修订,新的厚度应力计算程序适用于 "薄 "和 "中等 "工件,其应变与深度响应取决于工件厚度。这种新的计算程序不同于先前的标准,后者仅适用于应变与深度响应与厚度无关的厚工件。方法在一块厚铝板上测量近表面残余应力,该铝板含有均匀喷丸强化处理产生的近表面残余应力,并在强化表面测量从铝板上取下的不同厚度的样品。结果测量到的残余应力随样品厚度的变化而变化,较薄的样品表现出较小的近表面压应力和较大的次表面应力梯度。这些趋势与观察到的被移除样品的弯曲(曲率)和 FE 计算的预期残余应力趋势一致。对于中等厚度的样品,测量的残余应力和预期的残余应力非常一致,但随着样品厚度的增加,两者的一致程度降低。测量的残余应力与量具圆直径无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurements in Workpieces of Various Thickness

Background

A recent revision to the ASTM E837 standard for near-surface residual stress measurement by the hole-drilling method describes a new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure applicable to “thin” and “intermediate” workpieces for which strain versus depth response depends on workpiece thickness. This new calculation procedure differs from that of the prior standard, which applies only to thick workpieces with strain versus depth response independent of thickness.

Objective

Herein we assess the new calculation procedures by performing hole-drilling residual stress measurements in samples with a range of thickness.

Methods

Near-surface residual stress is measured in a thick aluminum plate containing near-surface residual stress from a uniform shot peening treatment, and in samples of different thickness removed from the plate at the peened surface. A finite element (FE) model is used to assess consistency between measured residual stress across the range of sample thickness.

Results

Measured residual stress varies with sample thickness, with thinner samples exhibiting smaller near-surface compressive stress and a larger gradient of subsurface stress. These trends are consistent with both observed bending (curvature) of the removed samples and the trend in FE-calculated expected residual stress. The measured and expected residual stresses are in good agreement for samples of intermediate thickness, but the agreement decreases with sample thickness. Measured residual stress is invariant with gage circle diameter.

Conclusion

The new thickness-dependent stress calculation procedure for hole-drilling provides meaningful improvement compared to thick-workpiece calculations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Mechanics
Experimental Mechanics 物理-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome. Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.
期刊最新文献
A Note of Gratitude from the Editor-in-Chief On the Cover: Accounting for Localized Deformation: A Simple Computation of True Stress in Micropillar Compression Experiments Dynamic Magneto-Mechanical Analysis of Isotropic and Anisotropic Magneto-Active Elastomers Measurement of the Tension Loss in a Cable Traveling Over a Pulley, for Low-Speed Applications Biomechanical Hand Model: Modeling and Simulating the Lateral Pinch Movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1