搅拌和静置对化学反应影响的比较

IF 1.7 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC Synlett Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2384-7220
Xianting Huang, Jianyou Zhao, Qingxu Wang, Pengkai Fang, Wei Xie, Meng Chen, Hongliang Han, Lanlan Zhang, Jiatai Zhang, Fan Wang, Zhong-Quan Liu
{"title":"搅拌和静置对化学反应影响的比较","authors":"Xianting Huang, Jianyou Zhao, Qingxu Wang, Pengkai Fang, Wei Xie, Meng Chen, Hongliang Han, Lanlan Zhang, Jiatai Zhang, Fan Wang, Zhong-Quan Liu","doi":"10.1055/a-2384-7220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For hundreds of years, it seems that people have needed stirring to conduct chemical experiments. This operation can be seen everywhere in chemical, pharmaceutical, and materials laboratories and factories. People generally believe that stirring helps with processes such as material dispersion, dissolution, and collision, thereby enabling more-efficient reactions. However, why do chemical reactions that occur in Nature not require stirring? What are the facts? For this purpose, we investigated a total of 329 organic chemical reactions in eight categories and 25 types, including 26 chemical reactions magnified to gram or even kilogram levels. Under the same conditions of temperature, humidity, pressure, and reaction time, we compared the reaction yields under stirring and standing conditions. More than 600 results showed that stirring or not stirring had almost no effect on the efficiency of chemical reactions in solution. If most chemists performing reactions turned off the agitator, it would not be difficult to imagine how much electricity could be saved!</p> ","PeriodicalId":22319,"journal":{"name":"Synlett","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effects of Stirring and Standing on Chemical Reactions\",\"authors\":\"Xianting Huang, Jianyou Zhao, Qingxu Wang, Pengkai Fang, Wei Xie, Meng Chen, Hongliang Han, Lanlan Zhang, Jiatai Zhang, Fan Wang, Zhong-Quan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2384-7220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For hundreds of years, it seems that people have needed stirring to conduct chemical experiments. This operation can be seen everywhere in chemical, pharmaceutical, and materials laboratories and factories. People generally believe that stirring helps with processes such as material dispersion, dissolution, and collision, thereby enabling more-efficient reactions. However, why do chemical reactions that occur in Nature not require stirring? What are the facts? For this purpose, we investigated a total of 329 organic chemical reactions in eight categories and 25 types, including 26 chemical reactions magnified to gram or even kilogram levels. Under the same conditions of temperature, humidity, pressure, and reaction time, we compared the reaction yields under stirring and standing conditions. More than 600 results showed that stirring or not stirring had almost no effect on the efficiency of chemical reactions in solution. If most chemists performing reactions turned off the agitator, it would not be difficult to imagine how much electricity could be saved!</p> \",\"PeriodicalId\":22319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synlett\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synlett\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2384-7220\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synlett","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2384-7220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数百年来,人们似乎一直需要搅拌来进行化学实验。在化学、制药、材料实验室和工厂中,这种操作随处可见。人们普遍认为,搅拌有助于物质的分散、溶解和碰撞等过程,从而提高反应效率。然而,为什么自然界中发生的化学反应不需要搅拌呢?事实究竟如何?为此,我们调查了 8 类 25 种共 329 个有机化学反应,其中包括 26 个放大到克级甚至公斤级的化学反应。在相同的温度、湿度、压力和反应时间条件下,我们比较了搅拌和静置条件下的反应产率。600 多项结果表明,搅拌与否对溶液中化学反应的效率几乎没有影响。如果大多数进行反应的化学家关闭搅拌器,不难想象可以节省多少电力!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effects of Stirring and Standing on Chemical Reactions

For hundreds of years, it seems that people have needed stirring to conduct chemical experiments. This operation can be seen everywhere in chemical, pharmaceutical, and materials laboratories and factories. People generally believe that stirring helps with processes such as material dispersion, dissolution, and collision, thereby enabling more-efficient reactions. However, why do chemical reactions that occur in Nature not require stirring? What are the facts? For this purpose, we investigated a total of 329 organic chemical reactions in eight categories and 25 types, including 26 chemical reactions magnified to gram or even kilogram levels. Under the same conditions of temperature, humidity, pressure, and reaction time, we compared the reaction yields under stirring and standing conditions. More than 600 results showed that stirring or not stirring had almost no effect on the efficiency of chemical reactions in solution. If most chemists performing reactions turned off the agitator, it would not be difficult to imagine how much electricity could be saved!

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Synlett
Synlett 化学-有机化学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SYNLETT is an international journal reporting research results and current trends in chemical synthesis in short personalized reviews and preliminary communications. It covers all fields of scientific endeavor that involve organic synthesis, including catalysis, organometallic, medicinal, biological, and photochemistry, but also related disciplines and offers the possibility to publish scientific primary data.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable N-Formylation of Anilines: Harnessing Aleuritic Acid as a Renewable Formyl Source Acceptorless Dehydrogenation under Neat Reaction Conditions: Synthesis of 2-Aryl/Alkyl Quinazolinones Using Supported Ni NPs as Catalyst Comparison of the Effects of Stirring and Standing on Chemical Reactions Nickel-Catalyzed O-Methylation of Cinnamic Acid Using DMSO as Methyl Surrogate Skeletal Reorganization: Approaches towards the Synthesis of Aza-Heterocyclic Cores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1