二进制分类器错位的逻辑警报

Andrés Corrada-Emmanuel, Ilya Parker, Ramesh Bharadwaj
{"title":"二进制分类器错位的逻辑警报","authors":"Andrés Corrada-Emmanuel, Ilya Parker, Ramesh Bharadwaj","doi":"arxiv-2409.11052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If two agents disagree in their decisions, we may suspect they are not both\ncorrect. This intuition is formalized for evaluating agents that have carried\nout a binary classification task. Their agreements and disagreements on a joint\ntest allow us to establish the only group evaluations logically consistent with\ntheir responses. This is done by establishing a set of axioms (algebraic\nrelations) that must be universally obeyed by all evaluations of binary\nresponders. A complete set of such axioms are possible for each ensemble of\nsize N. The axioms for $N = 1, 2$ are used to construct a fully logical alarm -\none that can prove that at least one ensemble member is malfunctioning using\nonly unlabeled data. The similarities of this approach to formal software\nverification and its utility for recent agendas of safe guaranteed AI are\ndiscussed.","PeriodicalId":501301,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A logical alarm for misaligned binary classifiers\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Corrada-Emmanuel, Ilya Parker, Ramesh Bharadwaj\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If two agents disagree in their decisions, we may suspect they are not both\\ncorrect. This intuition is formalized for evaluating agents that have carried\\nout a binary classification task. Their agreements and disagreements on a joint\\ntest allow us to establish the only group evaluations logically consistent with\\ntheir responses. This is done by establishing a set of axioms (algebraic\\nrelations) that must be universally obeyed by all evaluations of binary\\nresponders. A complete set of such axioms are possible for each ensemble of\\nsize N. The axioms for $N = 1, 2$ are used to construct a fully logical alarm -\\none that can prove that at least one ensemble member is malfunctioning using\\nonly unlabeled data. The similarities of this approach to formal software\\nverification and its utility for recent agendas of safe guaranteed AI are\\ndiscussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果两个代理的决定不一致,我们可能会怀疑他们并不都是正确的。这种直觉在对执行二元分类任务的代理进行评估时得到了形式化。通过它们在联合测试中的一致和分歧,我们可以确定与它们的回答在逻辑上唯一一致的小组评价。要做到这一点,我们需要建立一组公理(代数关系),所有对二元应答者的评价都必须普遍遵守这些公理。N=1、2$ 的公理可用于构建完全符合逻辑的警报--只需使用未标记的数据,就能证明至少有一个集合成员出现了故障。本文讨论了这种方法与正式软件验证的相似之处,以及它对近期安全保证人工智能议程的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A logical alarm for misaligned binary classifiers
If two agents disagree in their decisions, we may suspect they are not both correct. This intuition is formalized for evaluating agents that have carried out a binary classification task. Their agreements and disagreements on a joint test allow us to establish the only group evaluations logically consistent with their responses. This is done by establishing a set of axioms (algebraic relations) that must be universally obeyed by all evaluations of binary responders. A complete set of such axioms are possible for each ensemble of size N. The axioms for $N = 1, 2$ are used to construct a fully logical alarm - one that can prove that at least one ensemble member is malfunctioning using only unlabeled data. The similarities of this approach to formal software verification and its utility for recent agendas of safe guaranteed AI are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Almost Sure Convergence of Linear Temporal Difference Learning with Arbitrary Features The Impact of Element Ordering on LM Agent Performance Towards Interpretable End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prediction: Utilizing Administrative Claims Data with Explainable AI Techniques Extended Deep Submodular Functions Symmetry-Enriched Learning: A Category-Theoretic Framework for Robust Machine Learning Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1