DracoGPT:从大型语言模型中提取可视化设计偏好

Huichen Will Wang;Mitchell Gordon;Leilani Battle;Jeffrey Heer
{"title":"DracoGPT:从大型语言模型中提取可视化设计偏好","authors":"Huichen Will Wang;Mitchell Gordon;Leilani Battle;Jeffrey Heer","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trained on vast corpora, Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to encode visualization design knowledge and best practices. However, if they fail to do so, they might provide unreliable visualization recommendations. What visualization design preferences, then, have LLMs learned? We contribute DracoGPT, a method for extracting, modeling, and assessing visualization design preferences from LLMs. To assess varied tasks, we develop two pipelines—DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend—to model LLMs prompted to either rank or recommend visual encoding specifications. We use Draco as a shared knowledge base in which to represent LLM design preferences and compare them to best practices from empirical research. We demonstrate that DracoGPT can accurately model the preferences expressed by LLMs, enabling analysis in terms of Draco design constraints. Across a suite of backing LLMs, we find that DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend moderately agree with each other, but both substantially diverge from guidelines drawn from human subjects experiments. Future work can build on our approach to expand Draco's knowledge base to model a richer set of preferences and to provide a robust and cost-effective stand-in for LLMs.","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"31 1","pages":"710-720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language Models\",\"authors\":\"Huichen Will Wang;Mitchell Gordon;Leilani Battle;Jeffrey Heer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trained on vast corpora, Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to encode visualization design knowledge and best practices. However, if they fail to do so, they might provide unreliable visualization recommendations. What visualization design preferences, then, have LLMs learned? We contribute DracoGPT, a method for extracting, modeling, and assessing visualization design preferences from LLMs. To assess varied tasks, we develop two pipelines—DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend—to model LLMs prompted to either rank or recommend visual encoding specifications. We use Draco as a shared knowledge base in which to represent LLM design preferences and compare them to best practices from empirical research. We demonstrate that DracoGPT can accurately model the preferences expressed by LLMs, enabling analysis in terms of Draco design constraints. Across a suite of backing LLMs, we find that DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend moderately agree with each other, but both substantially diverge from guidelines drawn from human subjects experiments. Future work can build on our approach to expand Draco's knowledge base to model a richer set of preferences and to provide a robust and cost-effective stand-in for LLMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"710-720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681108/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681108/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLM)在庞大的语料库中经过训练,有可能编码可视化设计知识和最佳实践。然而,如果它们做不到这一点,就有可能提供不可靠的可视化建议。那么,LLM学到了哪些可视化设计偏好呢?我们贡献了DracoGPT,这是一种从LLMs中提取、建模和评估可视化设计偏好的方法。为了评估不同的任务,我们开发了两个管道--DracoGPT-Rank 和 DracoGPT-Recommend--来对 LLM 进行建模,促使其对可视化编码规范进行排序或推荐。我们使用 Draco 作为共享知识库,在其中表示 LLM 的设计偏好,并将其与经验研究中的最佳实践进行比较。我们证明,DracoGPT 可以准确地模拟 LLM 所表达的偏好,并能根据 Draco 设计约束进行分析。我们发现,DracoGPT-Rank 和 DracoGPT-Recommend在一定程度上相互吻合,但两者都大大偏离了从人体实验中得出的指导原则。未来的工作可以以我们的方法为基础,扩展 Draco 的知识库,为更丰富的偏好集建模,并为 LLMs 提供一个稳健且经济高效的替身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language Models
Trained on vast corpora, Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to encode visualization design knowledge and best practices. However, if they fail to do so, they might provide unreliable visualization recommendations. What visualization design preferences, then, have LLMs learned? We contribute DracoGPT, a method for extracting, modeling, and assessing visualization design preferences from LLMs. To assess varied tasks, we develop two pipelines—DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend—to model LLMs prompted to either rank or recommend visual encoding specifications. We use Draco as a shared knowledge base in which to represent LLM design preferences and compare them to best practices from empirical research. We demonstrate that DracoGPT can accurately model the preferences expressed by LLMs, enabling analysis in terms of Draco design constraints. Across a suite of backing LLMs, we find that DracoGPT-Rank and DracoGPT-Recommend moderately agree with each other, but both substantially diverge from guidelines drawn from human subjects experiments. Future work can build on our approach to expand Draco's knowledge base to model a richer set of preferences and to provide a robust and cost-effective stand-in for LLMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2024 Reviewers List Errata to “DiffFit: Visually-Guided Differentiable Fitting of Molecule Structures to a Cryo-EM Map” The Census-Stub Graph Invariant Descriptor TimeLighting: Guided Exploration of 2D Temporal Network Projections Preface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1