Chunyan Hou, Ci Wu, Zichun Wu, Yifan Cheng, Weiyu Li, Hui Sun, Junfeng Ma
{"title":"系统评估用于 O-谷氨酰核糖蛋白质组学的亲和富集方法","authors":"Chunyan Hou, Ci Wu, Zichun Wu, Yifan Cheng, Weiyu Li, Hui Sun, Junfeng Ma","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O-Linked β-<i>N</i>-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Hou, Ci Wu, Zichun Wu, Yifan Cheng, Weiyu Li, Hui Sun, Junfeng Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O-Linked β-<i>N</i>-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics
O-Linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".