评估警车在苛刻条件下的高级驾驶辅助系统。

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652
Farzaneh Shahini,Vanessa Nasr,Maryam Zahabi
{"title":"评估警车在苛刻条件下的高级驾驶辅助系统。","authors":"Farzaneh Shahini,Vanessa Nasr,Maryam Zahabi","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are technologies that can enhance drivers' safety by relieving them from some driving related activities. However, police driving conditions and demands are different from those of civilian drivers. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of ADAS such as forward collision warning (FCW), automatic emergency braking (AEB), and blind spot monitoring (BSM) on police officers' driving performance, workload, and trust in vehicle safety to provide personalised solutions for police vehicles. A driving simulation study was conducted with 18 police officers. ADAS use was assessed under various driving conditions and while officers were engaged in non-driving related tasks. Findings suggested that the FCW and AEB systems improved officers' driving performance, while the BSM system had limited effectiveness due to low salience. ADAS were beneficial under normal driving conditions and when officers were using in-vehicle technology; however, they did not help officers in pursuit conditions.","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing advanced driver assistance systems in police vehicles under demanding conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Farzaneh Shahini,Vanessa Nasr,Maryam Zahabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are technologies that can enhance drivers' safety by relieving them from some driving related activities. However, police driving conditions and demands are different from those of civilian drivers. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of ADAS such as forward collision warning (FCW), automatic emergency braking (AEB), and blind spot monitoring (BSM) on police officers' driving performance, workload, and trust in vehicle safety to provide personalised solutions for police vehicles. A driving simulation study was conducted with 18 police officers. ADAS use was assessed under various driving conditions and while officers were engaged in non-driving related tasks. Findings suggested that the FCW and AEB systems improved officers' driving performance, while the BSM system had limited effectiveness due to low salience. ADAS were beneficial under normal driving conditions and when officers were using in-vehicle technology; however, they did not help officers in pursuit conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2404652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级驾驶员辅助系统(ADAS)是一种技术,可以减轻驾驶员的一些驾驶相关活动,从而提高驾驶员的安全性。然而,警察的驾驶条件和需求与平民驾驶员不同。本研究的目的是评估前撞预警(FCW)、自动紧急制动(AEB)和盲点监测(BSM)等 ADAS 对警员驾驶表现、工作量和车辆安全信任度的影响,从而为警用车辆提供个性化解决方案。我们对 18 名警官进行了驾驶模拟研究。在不同的驾驶条件下,以及在警官从事与驾驶无关的任务时,对 ADAS 的使用情况进行了评估。研究结果表明,FCW 和 AEB 系统提高了警员的驾驶表现,而 BSM 系统由于显著性低,效果有限。在正常驾驶条件下以及警官使用车载技术时,自动驾驶辅助系统都是有益的;但在追捕条件下,它们对警官没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing advanced driver assistance systems in police vehicles under demanding conditions.
Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are technologies that can enhance drivers' safety by relieving them from some driving related activities. However, police driving conditions and demands are different from those of civilian drivers. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of ADAS such as forward collision warning (FCW), automatic emergency braking (AEB), and blind spot monitoring (BSM) on police officers' driving performance, workload, and trust in vehicle safety to provide personalised solutions for police vehicles. A driving simulation study was conducted with 18 police officers. ADAS use was assessed under various driving conditions and while officers were engaged in non-driving related tasks. Findings suggested that the FCW and AEB systems improved officers' driving performance, while the BSM system had limited effectiveness due to low salience. ADAS were beneficial under normal driving conditions and when officers were using in-vehicle technology; however, they did not help officers in pursuit conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
The effect of font boldness, noise disturbance and time pressure on human error in the context of cloud change operation. How flight experience impacts pilots' decision-making and visual scanning pattern in low-visibility approaches: preliminary evidence from eye tracking. The comfort and functional performance of personal protective equipment for police officers: a systematic scoping review. Virtual fit and design improvements of a filtering half-mask for sub-adult wearers. The impact of remote work using mobile information and communication technologies on physical health: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1