PTW 34070 大面积平行电离室在临床质子扫描束中的长期稳定性

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14525
Masashi Yamanaka, Yutaro Mori, Kazuki Matsumoto, Shunsuke Moriya, Akihiro Yamano, Takahiro Shimo, Ryosuke Shirata, Kazunori Nitta, Hironori Nagata, Koichi Tokuuye
{"title":"PTW 34070 大面积平行电离室在临床质子扫描束中的长期稳定性","authors":"Masashi Yamanaka, Yutaro Mori, Kazuki Matsumoto, Shunsuke Moriya, Akihiro Yamano, Takahiro Shimo, Ryosuke Shirata, Kazunori Nitta, Hironori Nagata, Koichi Tokuuye","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel‐plate ionization chamber. The long‐term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long‐term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.MethodsThe long‐term stability evaluation focused on the BPC‐Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.ResultsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono‐energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono‐energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono‐energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.ConclusionsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long‐term stability of a PTW 34070 large‐area parallel ionization chamber in clinical proton scanning beams\",\"authors\":\"Masashi Yamanaka, Yutaro Mori, Kazuki Matsumoto, Shunsuke Moriya, Akihiro Yamano, Takahiro Shimo, Ryosuke Shirata, Kazunori Nitta, Hironori Nagata, Koichi Tokuuye\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel‐plate ionization chamber. The long‐term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long‐term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.MethodsThe long‐term stability evaluation focused on the BPC‐Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.ResultsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono‐energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono‐energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono‐energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.ConclusionsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在质子治疗计划系统的射束数据建模中,绝对剂量测量是利用平行板电离室布拉格峰室(BPC)进行的。BPC 的长期稳定性对于确保精确的绝对剂量测量至关重要。研究旨在评估 BPC 在临床质子铅笔束扫描传输中的长期稳定性。方法长期稳定性评估主要针对 34070 型 BPC(德国弗莱堡 PTW 公司),在 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 11 月期间使用临床质子扫描束。每月进行一次调查,利用扩散布拉格峰(SOBP)场评估 BPC 和参考室的响应和交叉校准因子。此外,还对 BPC 对单能量光束的响应进行了评估,并检查了极性和离子重组对 BPC 的影响。在所有能量下,BPC 对单能量光束的响应变化高达 2.0%,显示出 SOBP 场和单能量光束的类似变化趋势。此外,极性和离子重组效应的变化全年稳定在 0.4% 的范围内。值得注意的是,无论是 SOBP 磁场还是单能量光束,BPC 在每次测量中的再现性都很高,观察到的最大偏差为 0.1%。不过,BPC 在每次测量中的再现性始终很高。建议在使用 BPC 进行绝对剂量测量时,每次测量都应将其响应与参比室进行比较和校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long‐term stability of a PTW 34070 large‐area parallel ionization chamber in clinical proton scanning beams
PurposeIn the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel‐plate ionization chamber. The long‐term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long‐term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.MethodsThe long‐term stability evaluation focused on the BPC‐Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.ResultsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono‐energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono‐energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono‐energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.ConclusionsThe response and cross‐calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1