对英国生物库多基因风险评分 (PRS) 发布的性能和特性进行系统评估。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307270
Deborah J Thompson,Daniel Wells,Saskia Selzam,Iliana Peneva,Rachel Moore,Kevin Sharp,William A Tarran,Edward J Beard,Fernando Riveros-Mckay,Carla Giner-Delgado,Duncan Palmer,Priyanka Seth,James Harrison,Marta Futema,,Gil McVean,Vincent Plagnol,Peter Donnelly,Michael E Weale
{"title":"对英国生物库多基因风险评分 (PRS) 发布的性能和特性进行系统评估。","authors":"Deborah J Thompson,Daniel Wells,Saskia Selzam,Iliana Peneva,Rachel Moore,Kevin Sharp,William A Tarran,Edward J Beard,Fernando Riveros-Mckay,Carla Giner-Delgado,Duncan Palmer,Priyanka Seth,James Harrison,Marta Futema,,Gil McVean,Vincent Plagnol,Peter Donnelly,Michael E Weale","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0307270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assess the UK Biobank (UKB) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release, a set of PRSs for 28 diseases and 25 quantitative traits that has been made available on the individuals in UKB, using a unified pipeline for PRS evaluation. We also release a benchmarking software tool to enable like-for-like performance evaluation for different PRSs for the same disease or trait. Extensive benchmarking shows the PRSs in the UKB Release to outperform a broad set of 76 published PRSs. For many of the diseases and traits we also validate the PRS algorithms in a separate cohort (100,000 Genomes Project). The availability of PRSs for 53 traits on the same set of individuals also allows a systematic assessment of their properties, and the increased power of these PRSs increases the evidence for their potential clinical benefit.","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic evaluation of the performance and properties of the UK Biobank Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah J Thompson,Daniel Wells,Saskia Selzam,Iliana Peneva,Rachel Moore,Kevin Sharp,William A Tarran,Edward J Beard,Fernando Riveros-Mckay,Carla Giner-Delgado,Duncan Palmer,Priyanka Seth,James Harrison,Marta Futema,,Gil McVean,Vincent Plagnol,Peter Donnelly,Michael E Weale\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0307270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assess the UK Biobank (UKB) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release, a set of PRSs for 28 diseases and 25 quantitative traits that has been made available on the individuals in UKB, using a unified pipeline for PRS evaluation. We also release a benchmarking software tool to enable like-for-like performance evaluation for different PRSs for the same disease or trait. Extensive benchmarking shows the PRSs in the UKB Release to outperform a broad set of 76 published PRSs. For many of the diseases and traits we also validate the PRS algorithms in a separate cohort (100,000 Genomes Project). The availability of PRSs for 53 traits on the same set of individuals also allows a systematic assessment of their properties, and the increased power of these PRSs increases the evidence for their potential clinical benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了英国生物库(UKB)发布的多基因风险评分(PRS),这是一套针对 28 种疾病和 25 个定量性状的多基因风险评分,已在英国生物库的个体中发布,采用了统一的多基因风险评分评估流程。我们还发布了一个基准软件工具,可对同一疾病或性状的不同 PRS 进行类似性能评估。广泛的基准测试表明,UKB Release 中的 PRS 优于已发布的 76 种 PRS。对于许多疾病和性状,我们还在一个单独的群组(10 万基因组项目)中验证了 PRS 算法。针对同一组个体的 53 个性状的 PRS 也允许对其特性进行系统性评估,这些 PRS 的能力的提高增加了其潜在临床益处的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic evaluation of the performance and properties of the UK Biobank Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release.
We assess the UK Biobank (UKB) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release, a set of PRSs for 28 diseases and 25 quantitative traits that has been made available on the individuals in UKB, using a unified pipeline for PRS evaluation. We also release a benchmarking software tool to enable like-for-like performance evaluation for different PRSs for the same disease or trait. Extensive benchmarking shows the PRSs in the UKB Release to outperform a broad set of 76 published PRSs. For many of the diseases and traits we also validate the PRS algorithms in a separate cohort (100,000 Genomes Project). The availability of PRSs for 53 traits on the same set of individuals also allows a systematic assessment of their properties, and the increased power of these PRSs increases the evidence for their potential clinical benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
"What does this mean for our future?" uncertainty management in mothers' narratives about the diagnosis and birth of their child with Down syndrome. A multimodal understanding of the role of sound and music in gendered toy marketing. Evaluation of the Vaginal Panel Realtime PCR kit (Vircell, SL) for diagnosing vaginitis: A comparative study with routinely used diagnostics. Fault-tolerant partition resolvability of cycle with chord. Few-shot learning for inference in medical imaging with subspace feature representations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1