Anitha Krishnan Pandarathodiyil, Hema Shree Kasirajan, Suresh Vemuri, G.V. Naga Sai Sujai, Sivapathasundharam B, Ramya Ramadoss
{"title":"唾液生物标记物诊断和预后类风湿性关节炎的潜力:系统综述与荟萃分析:类风湿关节炎患者唾液生物标志物--系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Anitha Krishnan Pandarathodiyil, Hema Shree Kasirajan, Suresh Vemuri, G.V. Naga Sai Sujai, Sivapathasundharam B, Ramya Ramadoss","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic debilitating autoimmune disorder. Blood biomarkers, like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), lack the sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis, delaying treatment. This review while highlighting the need for new diagnostic tools, emphasizes the promising avenue of saliva for developing RA biomarkers. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of salivary biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of RA, examining current evidence and proposing avenues for future research. A literature review following PRISMA 2021 guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies from the past five years on salivary biomarkers in RA patients compared to healthy controls. The review focused on original research articles, and meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting standard deviation values for inflammatory markers such as IL-6, IL-8, MMP-8, and TNF-alpha. The meta-analysis included eleven studies with 394 RA patients and 255 healthy controls, evaluating IL-8, IL-6, MMP-8, and TNF-α as RA biomarkers. IL-8 showed a mean difference of 7.32 (CI: -5.48 to 20.13), not statistically significant, favouring controls. IL-6 had a CI of -0.09 (CI: -2.20 to 2.02) with high heterogeneity (I² = 98%), suggesting its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. TNF-α and MMP-8 showed no significant differences (CIs: 4.54 and 2.71, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize saliva's potential in identifying RA biomarkers, especially IL-6, which is associated with the disease's pathogenesis. However, significant evidence heterogeneity necessitates larger, multicentric studies for validation","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential of salivary biomarkers for diagnosing and prognosing rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Salivary biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients – A systematic review with Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anitha Krishnan Pandarathodiyil, Hema Shree Kasirajan, Suresh Vemuri, G.V. Naga Sai Sujai, Sivapathasundharam B, Ramya Ramadoss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic debilitating autoimmune disorder. Blood biomarkers, like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), lack the sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis, delaying treatment. This review while highlighting the need for new diagnostic tools, emphasizes the promising avenue of saliva for developing RA biomarkers. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of salivary biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of RA, examining current evidence and proposing avenues for future research. A literature review following PRISMA 2021 guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies from the past five years on salivary biomarkers in RA patients compared to healthy controls. The review focused on original research articles, and meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting standard deviation values for inflammatory markers such as IL-6, IL-8, MMP-8, and TNF-alpha. The meta-analysis included eleven studies with 394 RA patients and 255 healthy controls, evaluating IL-8, IL-6, MMP-8, and TNF-α as RA biomarkers. IL-8 showed a mean difference of 7.32 (CI: -5.48 to 20.13), not statistically significant, favouring controls. IL-6 had a CI of -0.09 (CI: -2.20 to 2.02) with high heterogeneity (I² = 98%), suggesting its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. TNF-α and MMP-8 showed no significant differences (CIs: 4.54 and 2.71, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize saliva's potential in identifying RA biomarkers, especially IL-6, which is associated with the disease's pathogenesis. However, significant evidence heterogeneity necessitates larger, multicentric studies for validation\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"199 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种使人衰弱的慢性自身免疫性疾病。类风湿因子(RF)和抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(ACPA)等血液生物标志物缺乏早期诊断的敏感性和特异性,从而延误了治疗。本综述在强调需要新诊断工具的同时,还强调了唾液在开发类风湿关节炎生物标志物方面的前景。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了唾液生物标志物在诊断和预后RA方面的有效性,审查了当前的证据,并提出了未来的研究方向。根据 PRISMA 2021 指南,我们使用 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 进行了文献综述,以确定过去五年中有关 RA 患者唾液生物标记物与健康对照组比较的研究。综述侧重于原创性研究文章,并对报告了IL-6、IL-8、MMP-8和TNF-α等炎症标志物标准偏差值的研究进行了荟萃分析。荟萃分析包括11项研究,涉及394名RA患者和255名健康对照者,评估了作为RA生物标志物的IL-8、IL-6、MMP-8和TNF-α。IL-8的平均差异为7.32(CI:-5.48至20.13),无统计学意义,有利于对照组。IL-6的CI为-0.09(CI:-2.20至2.02),具有高度异质性(I² = 98%),表明其具有作为诊断和预后生物标志物的潜力。TNF-α和MMP-8无明显差异(CIs:分别为4.54和2.71)。本系统综述和荟萃分析强调了唾液在确定RA生物标志物方面的潜力,尤其是与疾病发病机制相关的IL-6。然而,由于证据存在明显的异质性,因此有必要进行更大规模的多中心研究来验证
Potential of salivary biomarkers for diagnosing and prognosing rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Salivary biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients – A systematic review with Meta-analysis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic debilitating autoimmune disorder. Blood biomarkers, like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), lack the sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis, delaying treatment. This review while highlighting the need for new diagnostic tools, emphasizes the promising avenue of saliva for developing RA biomarkers. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of salivary biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of RA, examining current evidence and proposing avenues for future research. A literature review following PRISMA 2021 guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies from the past five years on salivary biomarkers in RA patients compared to healthy controls. The review focused on original research articles, and meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting standard deviation values for inflammatory markers such as IL-6, IL-8, MMP-8, and TNF-alpha. The meta-analysis included eleven studies with 394 RA patients and 255 healthy controls, evaluating IL-8, IL-6, MMP-8, and TNF-α as RA biomarkers. IL-8 showed a mean difference of 7.32 (CI: -5.48 to 20.13), not statistically significant, favouring controls. IL-6 had a CI of -0.09 (CI: -2.20 to 2.02) with high heterogeneity (I² = 98%), suggesting its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. TNF-α and MMP-8 showed no significant differences (CIs: 4.54 and 2.71, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize saliva's potential in identifying RA biomarkers, especially IL-6, which is associated with the disease's pathogenesis. However, significant evidence heterogeneity necessitates larger, multicentric studies for validation