在患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病的成年和老年受试者中使用苯溴索的呼吸安全性

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14334
Jocelyn Y. Cheng, Daniel Lorch, Nancy Hall, Margaret Moline
{"title":"在患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病的成年和老年受试者中使用苯溴索的呼吸安全性","authors":"Jocelyn Y. Cheng, Daniel Lorch, Nancy Hall, Margaret Moline","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryBecause some hypnotics worsen respiratory conditions, it was important to determine the respiratory safety of lemborexant, a competitive dual orexin‐receptor antagonist approved to treat adults with insomnia, in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. E2006‐A001‐113 (Study 113; NCT04647383) was a multicentre, multiple‐dose, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐period crossover study in adult subjects with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (per spirometry‐based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] criteria). Subjects (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 30) were randomised to two treatment sequences comprising 8‐night treatment periods (washout ≥ 14 days) with lemborexant 10 mg or placebo. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>; primary endpoint), apnea–hypopnea index, objective sleep parameters and sleep architecture measures were assessed after single (Day 1) and multiple (Day 8) doses. There was no significant difference in least‐squares mean SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> after a single dose of lemborexant (91.1%) versus placebo (91.5%). Although a statistically significant difference in SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> was observed after multiple doses (least‐squares mean: lemborexant, 91.3%; placebo, 90.8%) favouring lemborexant, this was not considered clinically meaningful. Apnea–hypopnea index was not significantly different between treatments after single or multiple doses. Total sleep time and total rapid eye movement sleep were significantly greater on Days 1 and 8 with lemborexant versus placebo. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported in five (16.7%) subjects when taking lemborexant and four (13.3%) subjects when taking placebo; treatment‐emergent adverse events were mostly mild. Lemborexant was well tolerated and did not adversely impact SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> or apnea–hypopnea index after single and multiple doses relative to placebo in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory safety of lemborexant in adult and elderly subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Y. Cheng, Daniel Lorch, Nancy Hall, Margaret Moline\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.14334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SummaryBecause some hypnotics worsen respiratory conditions, it was important to determine the respiratory safety of lemborexant, a competitive dual orexin‐receptor antagonist approved to treat adults with insomnia, in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. E2006‐A001‐113 (Study 113; NCT04647383) was a multicentre, multiple‐dose, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐period crossover study in adult subjects with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (per spirometry‐based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] criteria). Subjects (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 30) were randomised to two treatment sequences comprising 8‐night treatment periods (washout ≥ 14 days) with lemborexant 10 mg or placebo. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>; primary endpoint), apnea–hypopnea index, objective sleep parameters and sleep architecture measures were assessed after single (Day 1) and multiple (Day 8) doses. There was no significant difference in least‐squares mean SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> after a single dose of lemborexant (91.1%) versus placebo (91.5%). Although a statistically significant difference in SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> was observed after multiple doses (least‐squares mean: lemborexant, 91.3%; placebo, 90.8%) favouring lemborexant, this was not considered clinically meaningful. Apnea–hypopnea index was not significantly different between treatments after single or multiple doses. Total sleep time and total rapid eye movement sleep were significantly greater on Days 1 and 8 with lemborexant versus placebo. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported in five (16.7%) subjects when taking lemborexant and four (13.3%) subjects when taking placebo; treatment‐emergent adverse events were mostly mild. Lemborexant was well tolerated and did not adversely impact SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> or apnea–hypopnea index after single and multiple doses relative to placebo in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要由于某些催眠药会加重呼吸系统疾病,因此必须确定lemborexant(一种获准用于治疗成人失眠症的竞争性双奥曲肽受体拮抗剂)在中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者中的呼吸系统安全性。E2006-A001-113(研究 113;NCT04647383)是一项多中心、多剂量、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两阶段交叉研究,研究对象为患有中度或重度慢性阻塞性肺病(根据基于肺活量测定的全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议 [GOLD] 标准)的成年受试者。受试者(N = 30)被随机分配到两个治疗序列,包括 8 夜治疗期(冲洗期≥ 14 天),分别服用 10 毫克的伦博雷沙坦或安慰剂。单次(第1天)和多次(第8天)用药后,对外周血氧饱和度(SpO2;主要终点)、呼吸暂停-低通气指数、客观睡眠参数和睡眠结构测量进行了评估。单次服用伦博雷沙坦(91.1%)与服用安慰剂(91.5%)后,最小二乘平均SpO2无明显差异。虽然在多次给药后观察到 SpO2 存在统计学意义上的显著差异(最小二乘法平均值:伦博罗司特,91.3%;安慰剂,90.8%),但这并不具有临床意义。单次或多次用药后,呼吸暂停-低通气指数在不同治疗之间没有显著差异。在第1天和第8天,总睡眠时间和总快速眼动睡眠时间明显多于安慰剂。服用伦博雷沙坦的受试者中有5人(16.7%)报告了治疗突发不良事件,服用安慰剂的受试者中有4人(13.3%)报告了治疗突发不良事件;治疗突发不良事件大多较轻。与安慰剂相比,中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者在单次和多次服用伦博雷沙坦后耐受性良好,不会对SpO2或呼吸暂停-低通气指数产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respiratory safety of lemborexant in adult and elderly subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
SummaryBecause some hypnotics worsen respiratory conditions, it was important to determine the respiratory safety of lemborexant, a competitive dual orexin‐receptor antagonist approved to treat adults with insomnia, in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. E2006‐A001‐113 (Study 113; NCT04647383) was a multicentre, multiple‐dose, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐period crossover study in adult subjects with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (per spirometry‐based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] criteria). Subjects (N = 30) were randomised to two treatment sequences comprising 8‐night treatment periods (washout ≥ 14 days) with lemborexant 10 mg or placebo. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2; primary endpoint), apnea–hypopnea index, objective sleep parameters and sleep architecture measures were assessed after single (Day 1) and multiple (Day 8) doses. There was no significant difference in least‐squares mean SpO2 after a single dose of lemborexant (91.1%) versus placebo (91.5%). Although a statistically significant difference in SpO2 was observed after multiple doses (least‐squares mean: lemborexant, 91.3%; placebo, 90.8%) favouring lemborexant, this was not considered clinically meaningful. Apnea–hypopnea index was not significantly different between treatments after single or multiple doses. Total sleep time and total rapid eye movement sleep were significantly greater on Days 1 and 8 with lemborexant versus placebo. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported in five (16.7%) subjects when taking lemborexant and four (13.3%) subjects when taking placebo; treatment‐emergent adverse events were mostly mild. Lemborexant was well tolerated and did not adversely impact SpO2 or apnea–hypopnea index after single and multiple doses relative to placebo in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study. Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1