制定评估第二受害者计划的核心指标:国际共识方法》。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428
Sofia Guerra-Paiva,Irene Carrillo,José Mira,Joana Fernandes,Reinhard Strametz,Eva Gil-Hernández,Paulo Sousa
{"title":"制定评估第二受害者计划的核心指标:国际共识方法》。","authors":"Sofia Guerra-Paiva,Irene Carrillo,José Mira,Joana Fernandes,Reinhard Strametz,Eva Gil-Hernández,Paulo Sousa","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\r\nTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nFrom an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\nThis study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Guerra-Paiva,Irene Carrillo,José Mira,Joana Fernandes,Reinhard Strametz,Eva Gil-Hernández,Paulo Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives\\r\\nTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.\\r\\n\\r\\nMethods\\r\\nA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nFrom an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusion\\r\\nThis study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 从 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月开展了一项分三个阶段的定性研究。这一共识方法吸引了欧洲第二受害者研究网络成员的参与。利用名义小组技术和范围界定审查的见解,为德尔菲回合编制了一份调查问卷。对指标进行 1-5 级评分,如果超过 70% 的参与者认为某项指标可行且敏感度高于 4 分,则达成一致意见,然后召开共识会议。结果在最初的 113 项指标中,有 59 项接受了在线评估,其中 35 项进入德尔菲轮。两轮德尔菲评估的回复率分别超过了 60% 和 80%,最终就 11 项 SV 支持项目评估指标达成了共识。这些指标包括认识和激活、SV 支持项目的成果以及机构提供的培训。结论本研究为设计和监测 SV 支持项目以及在未来研究中衡量标准化成果提供了一个记分牌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.
Objectives To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations. Methods A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference. Results From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution. Conclusion This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Health
International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
269
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of the Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Breeders and Livestock. Comparison of Causes of Mortality Between Hospitalized Unsheltered Homeless Patients and Non-Homeless Sex and Age-Matched Controls: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Determinants of Utilization of Antenatal Care Services Among Women of Childbearing Age in Jigawa State, Nigeria. An Improved Air Health Index Based on Short-Term Cardiovascular Effects in Tianjin, China. Global Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Analysis (1990-2019).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1