{"title":"论最优贝叶斯机制的 $k$-wise 独立性的鲁棒性","authors":"Nick Gravin, Zhiqi Wang","doi":"arxiv-2409.08547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reexamines the classic problem of revenue maximization in\nsingle-item auctions with $n$ buyers under the lens of the robust optimization\nframework. The celebrated Myerson's mechanism is the format that maximizes the\nseller's revenue under the prior distribution, which is mutually independent\nacross all $n$ buyers. As argued in a recent line of work (Caragiannis et al.\n22), (Dughmi et al. 24), mutual independence is a strong assumption that is\nextremely hard to verify statistically, thus it is important to relax the\nassumption. While optimal under mutual independent prior, we find that Myerson's\nmechanism may lose almost all of its revenue when the independence assumption\nis relaxed to pairwise independence, i.e., Myerson's mechanism is not\npairwise-robust. The mechanism regains robustness when the prior is assumed to\nbe 3-wise independent. In contrast, we show that second-price auctions with\nanonymous reserve, including optimal auctions under i.i.d. priors, lose at most\na constant fraction of their revenues on any regular pairwise independent\nprior. Our findings draw a comprehensive picture of robustness to $k$-wise\nindependence in single-item auction settings.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Nick Gravin, Zhiqi Wang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reexamines the classic problem of revenue maximization in\\nsingle-item auctions with $n$ buyers under the lens of the robust optimization\\nframework. The celebrated Myerson's mechanism is the format that maximizes the\\nseller's revenue under the prior distribution, which is mutually independent\\nacross all $n$ buyers. As argued in a recent line of work (Caragiannis et al.\\n22), (Dughmi et al. 24), mutual independence is a strong assumption that is\\nextremely hard to verify statistically, thus it is important to relax the\\nassumption. While optimal under mutual independent prior, we find that Myerson's\\nmechanism may lose almost all of its revenue when the independence assumption\\nis relaxed to pairwise independence, i.e., Myerson's mechanism is not\\npairwise-robust. The mechanism regains robustness when the prior is assumed to\\nbe 3-wise independent. In contrast, we show that second-price auctions with\\nanonymous reserve, including optimal auctions under i.i.d. priors, lose at most\\na constant fraction of their revenues on any regular pairwise independent\\nprior. Our findings draw a comprehensive picture of robustness to $k$-wise\\nindependence in single-item auction settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文在稳健优化框架的视角下重新审视了有 n 个买家的单品拍卖中收益最大化的经典问题。著名的迈尔森机制是在先验分布下使卖方收益最大化的形式,而先验分布在所有 $n$ 买方中是相互独立的。正如最近的一些研究(Caragiannis et al.22)和(Dughmi et al.24)所指出的,相互独立是一个很强的假设,在统计上极难验证,因此放宽这一假设非常重要。我们发现,虽然迈尔森机制在相互独立的先验条件下是最优的,但当独立性假设放宽到成对独立性时,迈尔森机制可能会失去几乎所有的收益,也就是说,迈尔森机制并不是成对稳健的。当先验假定为三向独立时,该机制就会恢复稳健性。与此相反,我们证明了带有匿名储备金的二次定价拍卖(包括在 i.i.d. 先验下的最优拍卖)在任何常规的成对独立先验下最多损失其收入的固定部分。我们的发现全面描绘了在单项拍卖中$k$智独立的稳健性。
On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms
This paper reexamines the classic problem of revenue maximization in
single-item auctions with $n$ buyers under the lens of the robust optimization
framework. The celebrated Myerson's mechanism is the format that maximizes the
seller's revenue under the prior distribution, which is mutually independent
across all $n$ buyers. As argued in a recent line of work (Caragiannis et al.
22), (Dughmi et al. 24), mutual independence is a strong assumption that is
extremely hard to verify statistically, thus it is important to relax the
assumption. While optimal under mutual independent prior, we find that Myerson's
mechanism may lose almost all of its revenue when the independence assumption
is relaxed to pairwise independence, i.e., Myerson's mechanism is not
pairwise-robust. The mechanism regains robustness when the prior is assumed to
be 3-wise independent. In contrast, we show that second-price auctions with
anonymous reserve, including optimal auctions under i.i.d. priors, lose at most
a constant fraction of their revenues on any regular pairwise independent
prior. Our findings draw a comprehensive picture of robustness to $k$-wise
independence in single-item auction settings.