{"title":"基于应急分析的生态系统服务扶贫可持续性评估:中国川西北高原藏区案例研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although China has successfully addressed absolute poverty, poor areas still face the challenge of reducing relative poverty while achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. A comprehensive sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation from multiple perspectives is crucial. However, existing studies have paid little attention to specific poverty alleviation measures and their ecological impacts, and lack a uniform unit of measurement. In this study, a comprehensive system for sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation is established via quantitative emergy analysis methods. Emergy accounting was conducted for two business development-based poverty alleviation programs in the Tibetan area of the Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China, from three perspectives: production processes, multidimensional poverty reduction, and ecosystem services. Emergy indices were calculated to evaluate sustainability. The results indicate that the emergy of ecosystem services and poverty reduction has significantly increased in both programs, demonstrating their substantial impact on poverty alleviation and ecological enhancement. According to the emergy indices, the emergy sustainability index increased by 0.48 and 2.04, respectively, and the ecological poverty reduction index reached 8.83 and 4.64, respectively, indicating that both programs have become more sustainable. This study highlights the comprehensive benefits of poverty alleviation in Tibetan areas and provides insights into sustainability assessments that incorporate ecosystem services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859/pdfft?md5=3bc10df6879da9d57c6fcf2eb3ccd6a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X24010859-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services linked sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation based on emergy analysis: Case study in the Tibetan area of Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although China has successfully addressed absolute poverty, poor areas still face the challenge of reducing relative poverty while achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. A comprehensive sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation from multiple perspectives is crucial. However, existing studies have paid little attention to specific poverty alleviation measures and their ecological impacts, and lack a uniform unit of measurement. In this study, a comprehensive system for sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation is established via quantitative emergy analysis methods. Emergy accounting was conducted for two business development-based poverty alleviation programs in the Tibetan area of the Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China, from three perspectives: production processes, multidimensional poverty reduction, and ecosystem services. Emergy indices were calculated to evaluate sustainability. The results indicate that the emergy of ecosystem services and poverty reduction has significantly increased in both programs, demonstrating their substantial impact on poverty alleviation and ecological enhancement. According to the emergy indices, the emergy sustainability index increased by 0.48 and 2.04, respectively, and the ecological poverty reduction index reached 8.83 and 4.64, respectively, indicating that both programs have become more sustainable. This study highlights the comprehensive benefits of poverty alleviation in Tibetan areas and provides insights into sustainability assessments that incorporate ecosystem services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859/pdfft?md5=3bc10df6879da9d57c6fcf2eb3ccd6a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X24010859-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ecosystem services linked sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation based on emergy analysis: Case study in the Tibetan area of Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China
Although China has successfully addressed absolute poverty, poor areas still face the challenge of reducing relative poverty while achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. A comprehensive sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation from multiple perspectives is crucial. However, existing studies have paid little attention to specific poverty alleviation measures and their ecological impacts, and lack a uniform unit of measurement. In this study, a comprehensive system for sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation is established via quantitative emergy analysis methods. Emergy accounting was conducted for two business development-based poverty alleviation programs in the Tibetan area of the Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China, from three perspectives: production processes, multidimensional poverty reduction, and ecosystem services. Emergy indices were calculated to evaluate sustainability. The results indicate that the emergy of ecosystem services and poverty reduction has significantly increased in both programs, demonstrating their substantial impact on poverty alleviation and ecological enhancement. According to the emergy indices, the emergy sustainability index increased by 0.48 and 2.04, respectively, and the ecological poverty reduction index reached 8.83 and 4.64, respectively, indicating that both programs have become more sustainable. This study highlights the comprehensive benefits of poverty alleviation in Tibetan areas and provides insights into sustainability assessments that incorporate ecosystem services.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.