跨中枢神经系统血管床的活体内皮细胞易位组比较分析

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Experimental eye research Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2024.110101
Ana J. Chucair-Elliott , Kevin Pham , Audrey C.A. Cleuren , Christopher M. Schafer , Courtney T. Griffin , Sarah R. Ocanas , Willard M. Freeman , Michael H. Elliott
{"title":"跨中枢神经系统血管床的活体内皮细胞易位组比较分析","authors":"Ana J. Chucair-Elliott ,&nbsp;Kevin Pham ,&nbsp;Audrey C.A. Cleuren ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Schafer ,&nbsp;Courtney T. Griffin ,&nbsp;Sarah R. Ocanas ,&nbsp;Willard M. Freeman ,&nbsp;Michael H. Elliott","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2024.110101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Endothelial cells (ECs) display organ- and tissue-specific heterogeneity. In the eye, the retinal and choroidal vascular beds are distinct networks with different molecular and morphological properties that serve location-specific functions, i.e., the former maintaining a tight barrier and the latter, a permeable fenestrated vasculature. Given that retinal health critically relies on the function of these vascular beds and that their dysfunction is implicated in a variety of retinal diseases, a molecular understanding of both physiological and pathophysiological characteristics of these distinct vasculatures is critical. Given their interspersed anatomic distribution among parenchymal cells, the study of EC gene expression, <em>in vivo</em>, has been hampered by the challenge of isolating pure populations of ocular ECs in sufficient quantities for large-scale transcriptomics. To address this challenge, we present a methodological and analytical workflow to facilitate inter-tissue comparisons of the <em>in vivo</em> EC translatome isolated from choroid, retina, and brain using the Cre-inducible NuTRAP flox construct and two widely-used endothelial Cre mouse lines: constitutive Tie2-Cre and tamoxifen-inducible Cdh5-CreERT2. For each Cre line, inter-tissue comparison of TRAP-RNAseq enrichment (TRAP-isolated translatome vs input transcriptome) showed tissue-specific gene enrichments with differential pathway representation. For each mouse model, inter-tissue comparison of the EC translatome (choroid vs brain, choroid vs retina, and brain vs retina) showed over 50% overlap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the three paired comparisons, with differential pathway representation for each tissue. Pathway analysis of DEGs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP vs Tie2-NuTRAP comparison for retina, choroid, and brain predicted inhibition of processes related to myeloid cell function and activation, consistent with more specific targeting of ECs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP than in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which also targets hematopoietic progenitors giving rise to immune cells. Indeed, while TRAP enriches for EC transcripts in both models, myeloid transcripts were also captured in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which was confirmed using cell sorting. We suggest experimental/analytical considerations should be taken when selecting Cre-lines to target ECs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 110101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483524003233/pdfft?md5=e65d6a1b03aa1ed7f8ca3ab69fa4bbe9&pid=1-s2.0-S0014483524003233-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of In vivo endothelial cell translatomes across central nervous system vascular beds\",\"authors\":\"Ana J. Chucair-Elliott ,&nbsp;Kevin Pham ,&nbsp;Audrey C.A. Cleuren ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Schafer ,&nbsp;Courtney T. Griffin ,&nbsp;Sarah R. Ocanas ,&nbsp;Willard M. Freeman ,&nbsp;Michael H. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exer.2024.110101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Endothelial cells (ECs) display organ- and tissue-specific heterogeneity. In the eye, the retinal and choroidal vascular beds are distinct networks with different molecular and morphological properties that serve location-specific functions, i.e., the former maintaining a tight barrier and the latter, a permeable fenestrated vasculature. Given that retinal health critically relies on the function of these vascular beds and that their dysfunction is implicated in a variety of retinal diseases, a molecular understanding of both physiological and pathophysiological characteristics of these distinct vasculatures is critical. Given their interspersed anatomic distribution among parenchymal cells, the study of EC gene expression, <em>in vivo</em>, has been hampered by the challenge of isolating pure populations of ocular ECs in sufficient quantities for large-scale transcriptomics. To address this challenge, we present a methodological and analytical workflow to facilitate inter-tissue comparisons of the <em>in vivo</em> EC translatome isolated from choroid, retina, and brain using the Cre-inducible NuTRAP flox construct and two widely-used endothelial Cre mouse lines: constitutive Tie2-Cre and tamoxifen-inducible Cdh5-CreERT2. For each Cre line, inter-tissue comparison of TRAP-RNAseq enrichment (TRAP-isolated translatome vs input transcriptome) showed tissue-specific gene enrichments with differential pathway representation. For each mouse model, inter-tissue comparison of the EC translatome (choroid vs brain, choroid vs retina, and brain vs retina) showed over 50% overlap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the three paired comparisons, with differential pathway representation for each tissue. Pathway analysis of DEGs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP vs Tie2-NuTRAP comparison for retina, choroid, and brain predicted inhibition of processes related to myeloid cell function and activation, consistent with more specific targeting of ECs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP than in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which also targets hematopoietic progenitors giving rise to immune cells. Indeed, while TRAP enriches for EC transcripts in both models, myeloid transcripts were also captured in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which was confirmed using cell sorting. We suggest experimental/analytical considerations should be taken when selecting Cre-lines to target ECs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483524003233/pdfft?md5=e65d6a1b03aa1ed7f8ca3ab69fa4bbe9&pid=1-s2.0-S0014483524003233-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental eye research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483524003233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483524003233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内皮细胞(EC)具有器官和组织特异性。在眼睛中,视网膜血管床和脉络膜血管床是不同的网络,具有不同的分子和形态特性,发挥着不同位置的特异功能,即前者保持着严密的屏障,而后者则是可渗透的栅栏状血管。鉴于视网膜的健康严重依赖于这些血管床的功能,而它们的功能障碍又与多种视网膜疾病有关,因此从分子角度了解这些不同血管的生理和病理生理特征至关重要。鉴于视网膜血管内皮细胞在解剖学上分布不均,要研究体内视网膜血管内皮细胞的基因表达一直受到阻碍,因为很难分离出足够数量的纯眼底视网膜血管内皮细胞进行大规模转录组学研究。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一种方法和分析工作流程,以便于使用 Cre 诱导的 NuTRAP 浮构建体和两种广泛使用的内皮 Cre 小鼠品系(组成型 Tie2-Cre 和他莫昔芬诱导的 Cdh5-CreERT2)对从脉络膜、视网膜和大脑分离的体内 EC 转录组进行组织间比较。对于每种 Cre 株系,TRAP-RNAseq 富集(TRAP 分离的转录组与输入转录组)的组织间比较显示了组织特异性基因富集与不同通路的代表性。对于每个小鼠模型,EC转录组的组织间比较(脉络膜与大脑、脉络膜与视网膜、大脑与视网膜)显示,在三组配对比较中,差异表达基因(DEGs)的重叠率超过 50%,且每个组织的通路表现各不相同。对视网膜、脉络膜和脑的 Cdh5-NuTRAP 与 Tie2-NuTRAP 比较中的 DEGs 进行通路分析后发现,与髓细胞功能和活化相关的过程受到了抑制,这与 Cdh5-NuTRAP 比 Tie2-NuTRAP 模型更特异性地靶向 ECs 是一致的,因为 Tie2-NuTRAP 模型也靶向产生免疫细胞的造血祖细胞。事实上,虽然 TRAP 在两种模型中都能富集心肌转录本,但在 Tie2-NuTRAP 模型中也能捕获髓系转录本,这一点已通过细胞分选得到证实。我们建议,在选择以EC为靶标的Cre-lines时,应考虑实验/分析因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of In vivo endothelial cell translatomes across central nervous system vascular beds

Endothelial cells (ECs) display organ- and tissue-specific heterogeneity. In the eye, the retinal and choroidal vascular beds are distinct networks with different molecular and morphological properties that serve location-specific functions, i.e., the former maintaining a tight barrier and the latter, a permeable fenestrated vasculature. Given that retinal health critically relies on the function of these vascular beds and that their dysfunction is implicated in a variety of retinal diseases, a molecular understanding of both physiological and pathophysiological characteristics of these distinct vasculatures is critical. Given their interspersed anatomic distribution among parenchymal cells, the study of EC gene expression, in vivo, has been hampered by the challenge of isolating pure populations of ocular ECs in sufficient quantities for large-scale transcriptomics. To address this challenge, we present a methodological and analytical workflow to facilitate inter-tissue comparisons of the in vivo EC translatome isolated from choroid, retina, and brain using the Cre-inducible NuTRAP flox construct and two widely-used endothelial Cre mouse lines: constitutive Tie2-Cre and tamoxifen-inducible Cdh5-CreERT2. For each Cre line, inter-tissue comparison of TRAP-RNAseq enrichment (TRAP-isolated translatome vs input transcriptome) showed tissue-specific gene enrichments with differential pathway representation. For each mouse model, inter-tissue comparison of the EC translatome (choroid vs brain, choroid vs retina, and brain vs retina) showed over 50% overlap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the three paired comparisons, with differential pathway representation for each tissue. Pathway analysis of DEGs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP vs Tie2-NuTRAP comparison for retina, choroid, and brain predicted inhibition of processes related to myeloid cell function and activation, consistent with more specific targeting of ECs in the Cdh5-NuTRAP than in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which also targets hematopoietic progenitors giving rise to immune cells. Indeed, while TRAP enriches for EC transcripts in both models, myeloid transcripts were also captured in the Tie2-NuTRAP model which was confirmed using cell sorting. We suggest experimental/analytical considerations should be taken when selecting Cre-lines to target ECs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental eye research
Experimental eye research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
323
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.
期刊最新文献
Role of semaphorin7A in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Complement C3 knockout protects photoreceptors in the sodium iodate model. Assessment of Protein Profile ın Vitreous Samples of Patients with Epiretinal Membrane by Proteomic Approaches. Monochromatic light effects on refractive error, cone cell density and retinoic acid signaling in dorsal and ventral retina in guinea pigs Deferiprone protects photoreceptors by inhibiting ferroptosis after experimental retinal detachment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1