英格兰和威尔士饮用水公司碳效率基准的演变

IF 3.8 3区经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2024.101836

Manuel Mocholi-Arce , Ramon Sala-Garrido , Alexandros Maziotis , Maria Molinos-Senante

{"title":"英格兰和威尔士饮用水公司碳效率基准的演变","authors":"Manuel Mocholi-Arce , Ramon Sala-Garrido , Alexandros Maziotis , Maria Molinos-Senante","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water utilities face the challenge of transitioning to a low-carbon urban water cycle while reducing operational costs. This study evaluates the static and dynamic carbon efficiency of a sample of water companies from 2013 to 2018 operating in England and Wales. Each company was evaluated relative to itself and its peers using cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis techniques. The results showed that the carbon performance of the water industry improved by 2.1% per year, mainly due to efficiency change. In contrast, the contribution of factors driving technical and scale change was almost negligible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001292/pdfft?md5=bfbe2891db2261a36fc04e1d29b0deea&pid=1-s2.0-S0957178724001292-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution of benchmaking the carbon efficiency drinking water companies in England and Wales\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Mocholi-Arce , Ramon Sala-Garrido , Alexandros Maziotis , Maria Molinos-Senante\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Water utilities face the challenge of transitioning to a low-carbon urban water cycle while reducing operational costs. This study evaluates the static and dynamic carbon efficiency of a sample of water companies from 2013 to 2018 operating in England and Wales. Each company was evaluated relative to itself and its peers using cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis techniques. The results showed that the carbon performance of the water industry improved by 2.1% per year, mainly due to efficiency change. In contrast, the contribution of factors driving technical and scale change was almost negligible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001292/pdfft?md5=bfbe2891db2261a36fc04e1d29b0deea&pid=1-s2.0-S0957178724001292-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001292\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

水务公司面临着向低碳城市水循环过渡，同时降低运营成本的挑战。本研究评估了 2013 年至 2018 年在英格兰和威尔士运营的水务公司样本的静态和动态碳效率。采用交叉效率数据包络分析技术，对每家公司自身及其同行进行了评估。结果显示，水务行业的碳绩效每年提高 2.1%，这主要归功于效率变化。相比之下，技术和规模变化因素的贡献几乎可以忽略不计。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The evolution of benchmaking the carbon efficiency drinking water companies in England and Wales

Water utilities face the challenge of transitioning to a low-carbon urban water cycle while reducing operational costs. This study evaluates the static and dynamic carbon efficiency of a sample of water companies from 2013 to 2018 operating in England and Wales. Each company was evaluated relative to itself and its peers using cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis techniques. The results showed that the carbon performance of the water industry improved by 2.1% per year, mainly due to efficiency change. In contrast, the contribution of factors driving technical and scale change was almost negligible.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.