Evaluating groundwater vulnerability and assessing its quality for sustainable management

Areas with a dry climate constitute about 15% of the Earth's surface, so groundwater can be considered a safe alternative available for people who are living in these areas. Groundwater has special advantages compared to surface water in terms of spatiotemporal presence, high stability, easy access, and often of high quality and capable of resisting pollution and could be the alternative to solve the problem of water shortage.

The current study evaluated Irrigation Water Quality Indices (WQIs) as well as the predicting of GIS maps to evaluate groundwater resources for agricultural uses in Al-Najaf city. 24 samples were taken from the existing wells and examined for the characteristics relating the groundwater quality. Total hardness (TH), Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Residual Sodium Carbonate (RSC), Soluble Sodium Percentage (SSP), Magnesium Hazard (MH), Permeability Index (PI), and Kelley's Index (KI) were among the irrigation indices that were assessed and evaluated. The results showed that 95.8% of sites fall within the region of extremely high salinity danger /low sodium, and 4.2% of sites fall onto the medium sodium water class, Concerning SSP and RSC all samples are considered of good quality, 95.8% of samples are suitable for irrigation based on Kelly's Ratio index, while only 4.2% regarded unsuitable. The final WQIs values were exported to the ArcMap software to create the final study area's water quality indices maps. Conducting spatial variability of groundwater quality is essential for making reliable groundwater quality interpretations and for making accurate predictions of quality at any particular site, there must be a continuous salinity and contaminants concentrations checking up calculations in case there were a need for groundwater desalination process.