能源和经济部门的多样化如何影响环境质量?国际证据

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114347
Dung Phuong Hoang , Lan Khanh Chu , Thanh Trung To , Ha Thanh Le
{"title":"能源和经济部门的多样化如何影响环境质量?国际证据","authors":"Dung Phuong Hoang ,&nbsp;Lan Khanh Chu ,&nbsp;Thanh Trung To ,&nbsp;Ha Thanh Le","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diversification in economic and energy sectors has been proven to contribute enormously to economic development. However, given the sustainability targets, the effectiveness of those strategies in alleviating environmental deterioration is ambiguous. This research examines how economic complexity and energy diversification could affect the levels of carbon emissions among economies that are in different phases of economic growth. Applying a novel panel quantile regression to a sample of 66 economies from 1995 to 2018, dividing into high-income, upper-middle-income, and lower-middle-income subgroups, allows us to reveal and compare the heterogeneous impacts across different levels of carbon emissions and income levels. The empirical results reveal that the environmental impacts of both economic complexity and energy diversification are not only heterogeneous across quantiles of carbon emissions but also vary among high-, upper-middle-, and lower-middle-income countries. While economic sophistication improves environmental sustainability in high- and upper-middle-income countries, it exacerbates ecological degradation in lower-middle-income countries. While energy diversification benefits environmental quality across all quantiles of carbon emissions in both upper and lower-middle-income countries, a harmful effect of energy diversification is only found in some high-income economies. Our research findings suggest that although energy and economic diversification could be a viable path for upper-middle-income countries to attain sustainability targets, these strategies should be combined with other environmental protection strategies to demonstrate desirable environmental benefits in high-income and lower-middle-income countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 114347"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How diversification in energy and economic sectors influences environmental quality: International evidence\",\"authors\":\"Dung Phuong Hoang ,&nbsp;Lan Khanh Chu ,&nbsp;Thanh Trung To ,&nbsp;Ha Thanh Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Diversification in economic and energy sectors has been proven to contribute enormously to economic development. However, given the sustainability targets, the effectiveness of those strategies in alleviating environmental deterioration is ambiguous. This research examines how economic complexity and energy diversification could affect the levels of carbon emissions among economies that are in different phases of economic growth. Applying a novel panel quantile regression to a sample of 66 economies from 1995 to 2018, dividing into high-income, upper-middle-income, and lower-middle-income subgroups, allows us to reveal and compare the heterogeneous impacts across different levels of carbon emissions and income levels. The empirical results reveal that the environmental impacts of both economic complexity and energy diversification are not only heterogeneous across quantiles of carbon emissions but also vary among high-, upper-middle-, and lower-middle-income countries. While economic sophistication improves environmental sustainability in high- and upper-middle-income countries, it exacerbates ecological degradation in lower-middle-income countries. While energy diversification benefits environmental quality across all quantiles of carbon emissions in both upper and lower-middle-income countries, a harmful effect of energy diversification is only found in some high-income economies. Our research findings suggest that although energy and economic diversification could be a viable path for upper-middle-income countries to attain sustainability targets, these strategies should be combined with other environmental protection strategies to demonstrate desirable environmental benefits in high-income and lower-middle-income countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济和能源部门的多样化已被证明能极大地促进经济发展。然而,考虑到可持续发展的目标,这些战略在缓解环境恶化方面的有效性并不明确。本研究探讨了经济复杂性和能源多样化如何影响处于不同经济增长阶段的经济体的碳排放水平。在 1995 年至 2018 年的 66 个经济体样本中,我们将其分为高收入、中上收入和中低收入三个子组,运用新颖的面板量化回归方法,揭示并比较了不同碳排放水平和收入水平的异质性影响。实证结果表明,经济复杂性和能源多样化对环境的影响不仅在不同碳排放数量级之间存在差异,而且在高、中上和中低收入国家之间也存在差异。在高收入和中高收入国家,经济复杂性提高了环境可持续性,但在中低收入国家,经济复杂性加剧了生态退化。在中高收入和中低收入国家,能源多样化有利于所有碳排放数量级的环境质量,但能源多样化的有害影响只出现在一些高收入经济体。我们的研究结果表明,虽然能源和经济多样化是中上收入国家实现可持续发展目标的可行途径,但这些战略应与其他环境保护战略相结合,以在高收入和中低收入国家展示理想的环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How diversification in energy and economic sectors influences environmental quality: International evidence

Diversification in economic and energy sectors has been proven to contribute enormously to economic development. However, given the sustainability targets, the effectiveness of those strategies in alleviating environmental deterioration is ambiguous. This research examines how economic complexity and energy diversification could affect the levels of carbon emissions among economies that are in different phases of economic growth. Applying a novel panel quantile regression to a sample of 66 economies from 1995 to 2018, dividing into high-income, upper-middle-income, and lower-middle-income subgroups, allows us to reveal and compare the heterogeneous impacts across different levels of carbon emissions and income levels. The empirical results reveal that the environmental impacts of both economic complexity and energy diversification are not only heterogeneous across quantiles of carbon emissions but also vary among high-, upper-middle-, and lower-middle-income countries. While economic sophistication improves environmental sustainability in high- and upper-middle-income countries, it exacerbates ecological degradation in lower-middle-income countries. While energy diversification benefits environmental quality across all quantiles of carbon emissions in both upper and lower-middle-income countries, a harmful effect of energy diversification is only found in some high-income economies. Our research findings suggest that although energy and economic diversification could be a viable path for upper-middle-income countries to attain sustainability targets, these strategies should be combined with other environmental protection strategies to demonstrate desirable environmental benefits in high-income and lower-middle-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Policy implications of implementing residential PV solar energy systems in developing regions A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications The impact of digital economy on energy rebound effect in China: A stochastic energy demand frontier approach Editorial Board The value of decentral flexibility in nodal market design – A case study for Europe 2030
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1