三尖瓣置换术后通过冠状窦进行左心室起搏:病例报告和文献综述

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.017
Xiaoya Wang MD , Han Chen MD, PhD , Youqi Fan MD, PhD
{"title":"三尖瓣置换术后通过冠状窦进行左心室起搏:病例报告和文献综述","authors":"Xiaoya Wang MD ,&nbsp;Han Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Youqi Fan MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In patients with a mechanical tricuspid prosthetic valve, the transvenous position of a ventricular lead through the coronary sinus (CS) is a good alternative option to right ventricular or epicardial lead implantation. In cardiac resynchronization therapy, pacing the left ventricular lateral wall was considered the best site for the CS lead. However, for patients without a left bundle branch block, the best position of CS leads remains controversial. Here, we present a case of placing CS lead in the anterior interventricular vein. Measurements at implantation and 2 years’ follow-up reported low pacing thresholds with good sensing thresholds. The electrocardiograph showed narrow QRS complexes (120 ms) and follow-up echocardiography at 2 years presented left ventricular ejection fraction 58.9%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 662-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002575/pdfft?md5=cdcece7a77baa1cc48bab48faa09459f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002575-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular pacing through coronary sinus after tricuspid valve replacement: A case report and review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoya Wang MD ,&nbsp;Han Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Youqi Fan MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In patients with a mechanical tricuspid prosthetic valve, the transvenous position of a ventricular lead through the coronary sinus (CS) is a good alternative option to right ventricular or epicardial lead implantation. In cardiac resynchronization therapy, pacing the left ventricular lateral wall was considered the best site for the CS lead. However, for patients without a left bundle branch block, the best position of CS leads remains controversial. Here, we present a case of placing CS lead in the anterior interventricular vein. Measurements at implantation and 2 years’ follow-up reported low pacing thresholds with good sensing thresholds. The electrocardiograph showed narrow QRS complexes (120 ms) and follow-up echocardiography at 2 years presented left ventricular ejection fraction 58.9%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 662-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002575/pdfft?md5=cdcece7a77baa1cc48bab48faa09459f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002575-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于装有机械三尖瓣人工瓣膜的患者,通过冠状窦(CS)经静脉植入心室导联是替代右心室或心外膜导联植入的最佳选择。在心脏再同步化治疗中,左心室侧壁起搏被认为是 CS 导联的最佳位置。然而,对于没有左束支传导阻滞的患者,CS 导联的最佳位置仍存在争议。在此,我们介绍一例将 CS 导联置于前室间静脉的病例。植入时和两年随访的测量结果显示起搏阈值较低,感应阈值良好。心电图显示窄 QRS 波群(120 毫秒),2 年的随访超声心动图显示左室射血分数为 58.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left ventricular pacing through coronary sinus after tricuspid valve replacement: A case report and review of the literature

In patients with a mechanical tricuspid prosthetic valve, the transvenous position of a ventricular lead through the coronary sinus (CS) is a good alternative option to right ventricular or epicardial lead implantation. In cardiac resynchronization therapy, pacing the left ventricular lateral wall was considered the best site for the CS lead. However, for patients without a left bundle branch block, the best position of CS leads remains controversial. Here, we present a case of placing CS lead in the anterior interventricular vein. Measurements at implantation and 2 years’ follow-up reported low pacing thresholds with good sensing thresholds. The electrocardiograph showed narrow QRS complexes (120 ms) and follow-up echocardiography at 2 years presented left ventricular ejection fraction 58.9%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization Differences in clinical significance of atrial tachyarrhythmias in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation vs Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study Temporal changes in device-derived daily activity related to ventricular arrhythmias from the CERTITUDE registry Ventricular arrhythmias after atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: A multicenter study Ventricular tachycardia: Focal pulsed field electroporation as a rescue therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1