界面创新:企业风险投资的配置方法

IF 7.7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Venturing Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106438
Magnus Schückes , Benedikt Unger , Tobias Gutmann , Gerwin Fels
{"title":"界面创新:企业风险投资的配置方法","authors":"Magnus Schückes ,&nbsp;Benedikt Unger ,&nbsp;Tobias Gutmann ,&nbsp;Gerwin Fels","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores how corporate venture capital (CVC) units can be configured to effectively achieve innovation performance and succeed amidst the tensions they face at the intersection of the corporate and venture domain. Using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of 30 dedicated CVC investment arms, we analyze how successful units configure their internal arrangements in response to these tensions and generate various innovation outcomes for their parent organizations. We identify four different solutions for effective CVC unit configurations, highlighting that explorative and exploitative innovation success require different setups. Moreover, we find that more mature and explorative CVC units distance themselves via buffering from their corporate sponsor, while at the same time increasing their efforts to maintain deliberate connections via bridging to representatives of the very same corporate environment they stem from. For ambidextrous CVC units, a more dynamic setup that allows corporate leadership to selectively initiate collaboration with the corporate core when beneficial while facilitating distancing at other times proved successful. Our study contributes new evidence and theory on how CVC units can navigate tensions and balance competing demands at the interface of the corporate and venturing domains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 1","pages":"Article 106438"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000600/pdfft?md5=1bef59e12260479a685a4dea214927d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0883902624000600-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation at the interface: A configurational approach to corporate venture capital\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Schückes ,&nbsp;Benedikt Unger ,&nbsp;Tobias Gutmann ,&nbsp;Gerwin Fels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores how corporate venture capital (CVC) units can be configured to effectively achieve innovation performance and succeed amidst the tensions they face at the intersection of the corporate and venture domain. Using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of 30 dedicated CVC investment arms, we analyze how successful units configure their internal arrangements in response to these tensions and generate various innovation outcomes for their parent organizations. We identify four different solutions for effective CVC unit configurations, highlighting that explorative and exploitative innovation success require different setups. Moreover, we find that more mature and explorative CVC units distance themselves via buffering from their corporate sponsor, while at the same time increasing their efforts to maintain deliberate connections via bridging to representatives of the very same corporate environment they stem from. For ambidextrous CVC units, a more dynamic setup that allows corporate leadership to selectively initiate collaboration with the corporate core when beneficial while facilitating distancing at other times proved successful. Our study contributes new evidence and theory on how CVC units can navigate tensions and balance competing demands at the interface of the corporate and venturing domains.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 106438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000600/pdfft?md5=1bef59e12260479a685a4dea214927d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0883902624000600-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000600\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了企业风险投资(CVC)部门如何配置才能有效实现创新绩效,并在企业与风险领域交界处所面临的紧张关系中取得成功。通过对 30 个专门的 CVC 投资部门进行模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),我们分析了成功的 CVC 部门如何配置其内部安排以应对这些紧张局势,并为其母公司创造各种创新成果。我们为有效的 CVC 部门配置确定了四种不同的解决方案,强调探索性创新和开发性创新的成功需要不同的设置。此外,我们还发现,更成熟、更具探索性的 CVC 单位会通过缓冲与企业赞助商保持距离,同时也会加大努力,通过与它们所处的同一企业环境的代表建立联系,保持有意的联系。对于 "双面人 "的 CVC 单位来说,一种更动态的设置证明是成功的,这种设置允许企业领导层在有益的时候有选择性地启动与企业核心的合作,而在其他时候则促进疏远。我们的研究提供了新的证据和理论,说明 CVC 单位如何在企业和风险领域的交界处驾驭紧张局势和平衡相互竞争的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovation at the interface: A configurational approach to corporate venture capital

This study explores how corporate venture capital (CVC) units can be configured to effectively achieve innovation performance and succeed amidst the tensions they face at the intersection of the corporate and venture domain. Using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of 30 dedicated CVC investment arms, we analyze how successful units configure their internal arrangements in response to these tensions and generate various innovation outcomes for their parent organizations. We identify four different solutions for effective CVC unit configurations, highlighting that explorative and exploitative innovation success require different setups. Moreover, we find that more mature and explorative CVC units distance themselves via buffering from their corporate sponsor, while at the same time increasing their efforts to maintain deliberate connections via bridging to representatives of the very same corporate environment they stem from. For ambidextrous CVC units, a more dynamic setup that allows corporate leadership to selectively initiate collaboration with the corporate core when beneficial while facilitating distancing at other times proved successful. Our study contributes new evidence and theory on how CVC units can navigate tensions and balance competing demands at the interface of the corporate and venturing domains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Venturing: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Finance, Innovation and Regional Development serves as a scholarly platform for the exchange of valuable insights, theories, narratives, and interpretations related to entrepreneurship and its implications. With a focus on enriching the understanding of entrepreneurship in its various manifestations, the journal seeks to publish papers that (1) draw from the experiences of entrepreneurs, innovators, and their ecosystem; and (2) tackle issues relevant to scholars, educators, facilitators, and practitioners involved in entrepreneurship. Embracing diversity in approach, methodology, and disciplinary perspective, the journal encourages contributions that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in entrepreneurship and its associated domains.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking entrepreneurship in causally entangled crises: A poly-crisis perspective Amplifying angels: Evidence from the INVEST program False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform Funding-source-induced bias: How social ties influence entrepreneurs' anticipated guilt and risk-taking preferences Effect of venture capital investment horizon on new product development: Evidence from the medical device sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1