Soumya G. Chikermane, Jieni Li, Rajender R. Aparasu
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病患者在使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂时开始服用抗心绞痛药的风险","authors":"Soumya G. Chikermane, Jieni Li, Rajender R. Aparasu","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of cholinesterase inhibitors (CHEIs) is commonly associated with urinary incontinence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study evaluated the risk of antimuscarinic initiation drugs with the use of CHEIs in AD patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a nested case-control study design involving 2013–2015 Medicare data of AD patients 65 years and older without antimuscarinic use in 2013. Cases were defined as those who initiated antimuscarinic treatment in 2014–2015. Controls with no antimuscarinic use were selected through incidence density sampling and matched to cases on age using a variable-ratio method. The CHEI utilization pattern was classified as current (event-30 days), recent (event-31 to event-90 days), and past (event-91 to event-180 days). Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between CHEI use and the risk of antimuscarinic initiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 1,909 cases and 9,064 controls. The adjusted model found that overall CHEI (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.90, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.58–2.28) and current CHEI use (aOR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.18–2.21) were associated with an increase in the risk of antimuscarinic initiation compared to non-CHEI use. In addition, the current use of donepezil and rivastigmine significantly increased the risk of antimuscarinic initiation by 48 % (95 % CI: 1.03–2.12) and 171 % (95 % CI: 1.46–5.03), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found an increased risk of antimuscarinic initiation with the current use of CHEIs, particularly with donepezil and rivastigmine. These findings underscore the need for careful medication management to minimize prescribing cascades and associated consequences in AD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003054/pdfft?md5=a7d0abab7bc1edfd2b42da0d52dc404b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of antimuscarinic initiation with cholinesterase inhibitor use in Alzheimer's disease\",\"authors\":\"Soumya G. Chikermane, Jieni Li, Rajender R. Aparasu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of cholinesterase inhibitors (CHEIs) is commonly associated with urinary incontinence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study evaluated the risk of antimuscarinic initiation drugs with the use of CHEIs in AD patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a nested case-control study design involving 2013–2015 Medicare data of AD patients 65 years and older without antimuscarinic use in 2013. Cases were defined as those who initiated antimuscarinic treatment in 2014–2015. Controls with no antimuscarinic use were selected through incidence density sampling and matched to cases on age using a variable-ratio method. The CHEI utilization pattern was classified as current (event-30 days), recent (event-31 to event-90 days), and past (event-91 to event-180 days). Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between CHEI use and the risk of antimuscarinic initiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 1,909 cases and 9,064 controls. The adjusted model found that overall CHEI (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.90, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.58–2.28) and current CHEI use (aOR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.18–2.21) were associated with an increase in the risk of antimuscarinic initiation compared to non-CHEI use. In addition, the current use of donepezil and rivastigmine significantly increased the risk of antimuscarinic initiation by 48 % (95 % CI: 1.03–2.12) and 171 % (95 % CI: 1.46–5.03), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found an increased risk of antimuscarinic initiation with the current use of CHEIs, particularly with donepezil and rivastigmine. These findings underscore the need for careful medication management to minimize prescribing cascades and associated consequences in AD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003054/pdfft?md5=a7d0abab7bc1edfd2b42da0d52dc404b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003054-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk of antimuscarinic initiation with cholinesterase inhibitor use in Alzheimer's disease
Background
The use of cholinesterase inhibitors (CHEIs) is commonly associated with urinary incontinence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study evaluated the risk of antimuscarinic initiation drugs with the use of CHEIs in AD patients.
Methods
The study used a nested case-control study design involving 2013–2015 Medicare data of AD patients 65 years and older without antimuscarinic use in 2013. Cases were defined as those who initiated antimuscarinic treatment in 2014–2015. Controls with no antimuscarinic use were selected through incidence density sampling and matched to cases on age using a variable-ratio method. The CHEI utilization pattern was classified as current (event-30 days), recent (event-31 to event-90 days), and past (event-91 to event-180 days). Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between CHEI use and the risk of antimuscarinic initiation.
Results
This study included 1,909 cases and 9,064 controls. The adjusted model found that overall CHEI (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.90, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.58–2.28) and current CHEI use (aOR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.18–2.21) were associated with an increase in the risk of antimuscarinic initiation compared to non-CHEI use. In addition, the current use of donepezil and rivastigmine significantly increased the risk of antimuscarinic initiation by 48 % (95 % CI: 1.03–2.12) and 171 % (95 % CI: 1.46–5.03), respectively.
Conclusion
The study found an increased risk of antimuscarinic initiation with the current use of CHEIs, particularly with donepezil and rivastigmine. These findings underscore the need for careful medication management to minimize prescribing cascades and associated consequences in AD.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published.
Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.