两种药物护肤霜对糖尿病患者脚部干燥症的治疗效果:双臂双盲随机对照试验的原理与设计

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101372
Anna Ericsson , Karin Borgström , Christine Kumlien , Magdalena Gershater Annersten , Tautgirdas Ruzgas , Johan Engblom , Petri Gudmundsson , Victoria Lazer , Skaidre Jankovskaja , Eva Lavant , Sophia Ågren-Witteschus , Sebastian Björklund , Saman Salim , Mikael Åström , Stefan Acosta
{"title":"两种药物护肤霜对糖尿病患者脚部干燥症的治疗效果:双臂双盲随机对照试验的原理与设计","authors":"Anna Ericsson ,&nbsp;Karin Borgström ,&nbsp;Christine Kumlien ,&nbsp;Magdalena Gershater Annersten ,&nbsp;Tautgirdas Ruzgas ,&nbsp;Johan Engblom ,&nbsp;Petri Gudmundsson ,&nbsp;Victoria Lazer ,&nbsp;Skaidre Jankovskaja ,&nbsp;Eva Lavant ,&nbsp;Sophia Ågren-Witteschus ,&nbsp;Sebastian Björklund ,&nbsp;Saman Salim ,&nbsp;Mikael Åström ,&nbsp;Stefan Acosta","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To minimize the risk of developing foot-ulcers, persons with diabetes are given the advice to daily inspect their feet and to apply skincare formulations. However, commercially available skincare products have rarely been developed and evaluated for diabetes foot care specifically. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effects in reducing foot xerosis in persons with diabetes without foot-ulcers using two skincare creams containing different humectants (interventions) against a cream base non-humectant (comparator). Secondary outcomes are to evaluate differences on skin barrier integrity, low-molecular weight biomarkers and skin microbiota, microcirculation including transcutaneous oxygen pressure, degree of neuropathy, and HbA1c between intervention-comparator creams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-armed double-blind RCT, registered in <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: NCT06427889. With 80 % power, two-tailed significance of 2.5 % in each arm, 39 study persons is needed in each arm, total 78 persons, 98 including dropouts, to be able to prove a reduction of at least one category in the Xerosis Severity Scale with the intervention creams compared to the comparator. In one arm, each participant will treat one foot with one of the intervention creams (Oviderm® or Canoderm®), while the opposite foot will be treated with the comparator cream (Decubal®lipid cream), twice a day. If needed, participants are enrolled after a wash-out period of two weeks. The participants will undergo examinations at baseline, day 14 and day 28.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This RCT evaluate the potential effects of humectants in skin creams against foot xerosis in persons with diabetes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001194/pdfft?md5=f48333f5855f1319b1cce6062b04605d&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001194-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment effects of two pharmaceutical skin care creams for xerotic feet among persons with diabetes: Rationale and design of a two-armed double blind randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Anna Ericsson ,&nbsp;Karin Borgström ,&nbsp;Christine Kumlien ,&nbsp;Magdalena Gershater Annersten ,&nbsp;Tautgirdas Ruzgas ,&nbsp;Johan Engblom ,&nbsp;Petri Gudmundsson ,&nbsp;Victoria Lazer ,&nbsp;Skaidre Jankovskaja ,&nbsp;Eva Lavant ,&nbsp;Sophia Ågren-Witteschus ,&nbsp;Sebastian Björklund ,&nbsp;Saman Salim ,&nbsp;Mikael Åström ,&nbsp;Stefan Acosta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To minimize the risk of developing foot-ulcers, persons with diabetes are given the advice to daily inspect their feet and to apply skincare formulations. However, commercially available skincare products have rarely been developed and evaluated for diabetes foot care specifically. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effects in reducing foot xerosis in persons with diabetes without foot-ulcers using two skincare creams containing different humectants (interventions) against a cream base non-humectant (comparator). Secondary outcomes are to evaluate differences on skin barrier integrity, low-molecular weight biomarkers and skin microbiota, microcirculation including transcutaneous oxygen pressure, degree of neuropathy, and HbA1c between intervention-comparator creams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-armed double-blind RCT, registered in <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: NCT06427889. With 80 % power, two-tailed significance of 2.5 % in each arm, 39 study persons is needed in each arm, total 78 persons, 98 including dropouts, to be able to prove a reduction of at least one category in the Xerosis Severity Scale with the intervention creams compared to the comparator. In one arm, each participant will treat one foot with one of the intervention creams (Oviderm® or Canoderm®), while the opposite foot will be treated with the comparator cream (Decubal®lipid cream), twice a day. If needed, participants are enrolled after a wash-out period of two weeks. The participants will undergo examinations at baseline, day 14 and day 28.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This RCT evaluate the potential effects of humectants in skin creams against foot xerosis in persons with diabetes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001194/pdfft?md5=f48333f5855f1319b1cce6062b04605d&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001194-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:为了最大限度地降低患足部溃疡的风险,糖尿病患者被建议每天检查足部并使用护肤配方。然而,市面上很少有专门针对糖尿病足护理而开发和评估的护肤产品。这项随机对照试验(RCT)的主要目的是评估使用两种含有不同保湿剂的护肤霜(干预措施)和一种不含保湿剂的护肤霜(对比试验)对减轻无足部溃疡的糖尿病患者足部干燥症的效果。次要结果是评估干预药膏与对比药膏之间在皮肤屏障完整性、低分子量生物标志物和皮肤微生物群、微循环(包括经皮氧压)、神经病变程度和 HbA1c 方面的差异:NCT06427889。在80%的功率下,每组的双尾显著性为2.5%,每组需要39名研究人员,共78人(包括退出者98人),才能证明干预药膏与对比药膏相比,在 "角化严重程度量表"(Xerosis Severity Scale)中至少降低了一个等级。在一个治疗组中,每位受试者的一只脚使用一种干预药膏(Oviderm® 或 Canoderm®),另一只脚使用对比药膏(Decubal® 脂质药膏),每天两次。如有需要,参与者可在两周的冲洗期后参加治疗。本研究评估了护肤霜中的保湿剂对糖尿病患者足部干燥症的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment effects of two pharmaceutical skin care creams for xerotic feet among persons with diabetes: Rationale and design of a two-armed double blind randomized controlled trial

Introduction

To minimize the risk of developing foot-ulcers, persons with diabetes are given the advice to daily inspect their feet and to apply skincare formulations. However, commercially available skincare products have rarely been developed and evaluated for diabetes foot care specifically. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effects in reducing foot xerosis in persons with diabetes without foot-ulcers using two skincare creams containing different humectants (interventions) against a cream base non-humectant (comparator). Secondary outcomes are to evaluate differences on skin barrier integrity, low-molecular weight biomarkers and skin microbiota, microcirculation including transcutaneous oxygen pressure, degree of neuropathy, and HbA1c between intervention-comparator creams.

Methods

Two-armed double-blind RCT, registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06427889. With 80 % power, two-tailed significance of 2.5 % in each arm, 39 study persons is needed in each arm, total 78 persons, 98 including dropouts, to be able to prove a reduction of at least one category in the Xerosis Severity Scale with the intervention creams compared to the comparator. In one arm, each participant will treat one foot with one of the intervention creams (Oviderm® or Canoderm®), while the opposite foot will be treated with the comparator cream (Decubal®lipid cream), twice a day. If needed, participants are enrolled after a wash-out period of two weeks. The participants will undergo examinations at baseline, day 14 and day 28.

Discussion

This RCT evaluate the potential effects of humectants in skin creams against foot xerosis in persons with diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian adaptive feasibility design for rare diseases A protocol for modifying progesterone to increase postpartum cigarette smoking abstinence and reduce secondhand smoke exposure in infants An automated platform trial framework for A/B testing Personalizing cognitive processing therapy with a case formulation approach to intentionally target impairment in psychosocial functioning associated with PTSD Personalized tourniquet pressure versus uniform tourniquet pressure in orthopedic trauma surgery of extremities: A prospective randomized controlled study protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1