David M. Waterhouse , Sacha Rothschild , Christophe Dooms , Bertrand Mennecier , Farastuk Bozorgmehr , Margarita Majem , Michel H. van den Heuvel , Helena Linardou , Byoung Chul Cho , Rachel Roberts-Thomson , Kentaro Tanaka , Normand Blais , Gustavo Schvartsman , Karin Holmskov Hansen , Izabela Chmielewska , Martin D. Forster , Christina Giannopoulou , Björn Stollenwerk , Cynthia C. Obiozor , Yang Wang , Silvia Novello
{"title":"CodeBreaK 200的患者报告结果:索托拉西布与多西他赛治疗既往接受过KRAS G12C突变治疗的晚期NSCLC","authors":"David M. Waterhouse , Sacha Rothschild , Christophe Dooms , Bertrand Mennecier , Farastuk Bozorgmehr , Margarita Majem , Michel H. van den Heuvel , Helena Linardou , Byoung Chul Cho , Rachel Roberts-Thomson , Kentaro Tanaka , Normand Blais , Gustavo Schvartsman , Karin Holmskov Hansen , Izabela Chmielewska , Martin D. Forster , Christina Giannopoulou , Björn Stollenwerk , Cynthia C. Obiozor , Yang Wang , Silvia Novello","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib’s additional impact on quality of life (QOL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients’ perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients’ symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs –8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs –5.8 at week 12).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 107921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004550/pdfft?md5=f788b6bd78bf93b5b72d2444d5c9ed96&pid=1-s2.0-S0169500224004550-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation\",\"authors\":\"David M. Waterhouse , Sacha Rothschild , Christophe Dooms , Bertrand Mennecier , Farastuk Bozorgmehr , Margarita Majem , Michel H. van den Heuvel , Helena Linardou , Byoung Chul Cho , Rachel Roberts-Thomson , Kentaro Tanaka , Normand Blais , Gustavo Schvartsman , Karin Holmskov Hansen , Izabela Chmielewska , Martin D. Forster , Christina Giannopoulou , Björn Stollenwerk , Cynthia C. Obiozor , Yang Wang , Silvia Novello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib’s additional impact on quality of life (QOL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients’ perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients’ symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs –8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs –5.8 at week 12).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004550/pdfft?md5=f788b6bd78bf93b5b72d2444d5c9ed96&pid=1-s2.0-S0169500224004550-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004550\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation
Background
In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib’s additional impact on quality of life (QOL).
Methods
In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients’ perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes.
Results
Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients’ symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs –8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs –5.8 at week 12).
Conclusions
Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.