Jonathan S Ellison,Kathryn E Flynn,Katherine Sheridan,Samantha Siodlarz,Jodi Antonelli,Christopher E Bayne,Hunter Beck,Christina Ching,Pankaj P Dangle,Casey Dauw,Carley Davis,Kim Hollander,Dirk Lange,Kristi Ouimet,Carswell Ouimet,Amy Y Pan,Kristina Penniston,Charles D Scales,Nayan Shah,Ryan Spiardi,Necole Streeper,Kristin Whitmore,Mike Witt,Liyun Zhang,Gregory E Tasian
{"title":"肾结石病临床试验的患者优先研究议程。","authors":"Jonathan S Ellison,Kathryn E Flynn,Katherine Sheridan,Samantha Siodlarz,Jodi Antonelli,Christopher E Bayne,Hunter Beck,Christina Ching,Pankaj P Dangle,Casey Dauw,Carley Davis,Kim Hollander,Dirk Lange,Kristi Ouimet,Carswell Ouimet,Amy Y Pan,Kristina Penniston,Charles D Scales,Nayan Shah,Ryan Spiardi,Necole Streeper,Kristin Whitmore,Mike Witt,Liyun Zhang,Gregory E Tasian","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo ensure that research on kidney stones provides meaningful impact for the kidney stone community, patients and caregivers should be engaged as stakeholders in clinical trial design, starting at study inception. This project aimed to elicit, refine, and prioritize research ideas from kidney stone stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda for clinical trials.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThe Kidney Stone Engagement Core, a group of patients, caregivers, advocates, clinicians, and researchers, executed an iterative process of surveys and focus groups to elicit and refine research themes, which were then translated into research questions. A separate group of patients, caregivers, and clinicians prioritized these questions through parallel modified Delphi and crowd-sourced digital platforms. A research agenda was developed by the Kidney Stone Engagement Core based on the highest rated questions during a hybrid virtual/in-person capstone session.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 70 individuals (57 patients and caregivers, 13 researchers and clinicians) participated in the elicitation, 20 individuals (15 patients and caregivers, 5 researchers and clinicians) participated in refinement, and an additional 80 individuals (81 patients and caregivers, 9 researchers and clinicians) participated in prioritization. Key novel themes emerged from elicitation and refinement: ureteral stents, genetic evaluation, shared surgical decision-making, key subgroups, cumulative disease burden, genetic evaluation, and psychosocial support. Stakeholders generated 6 proposed trials from these themes focused on surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical prevention.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPatients and caregivers valued comparative effectiveness kidney stone research that focused on individualized care, shared decision-making, and improvement of patient-reported experiences. This process provided actionable recommendations for future patient-centered clinical trials within kidney stone disease.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"5 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Patient-Prioritized Research Agenda for Clinical Trials in Kidney Stone Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan S Ellison,Kathryn E Flynn,Katherine Sheridan,Samantha Siodlarz,Jodi Antonelli,Christopher E Bayne,Hunter Beck,Christina Ching,Pankaj P Dangle,Casey Dauw,Carley Davis,Kim Hollander,Dirk Lange,Kristi Ouimet,Carswell Ouimet,Amy Y Pan,Kristina Penniston,Charles D Scales,Nayan Shah,Ryan Spiardi,Necole Streeper,Kristin Whitmore,Mike Witt,Liyun Zhang,Gregory E Tasian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju.0000000000004242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo ensure that research on kidney stones provides meaningful impact for the kidney stone community, patients and caregivers should be engaged as stakeholders in clinical trial design, starting at study inception. This project aimed to elicit, refine, and prioritize research ideas from kidney stone stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda for clinical trials.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nThe Kidney Stone Engagement Core, a group of patients, caregivers, advocates, clinicians, and researchers, executed an iterative process of surveys and focus groups to elicit and refine research themes, which were then translated into research questions. A separate group of patients, caregivers, and clinicians prioritized these questions through parallel modified Delphi and crowd-sourced digital platforms. A research agenda was developed by the Kidney Stone Engagement Core based on the highest rated questions during a hybrid virtual/in-person capstone session.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 70 individuals (57 patients and caregivers, 13 researchers and clinicians) participated in the elicitation, 20 individuals (15 patients and caregivers, 5 researchers and clinicians) participated in refinement, and an additional 80 individuals (81 patients and caregivers, 9 researchers and clinicians) participated in prioritization. Key novel themes emerged from elicitation and refinement: ureteral stents, genetic evaluation, shared surgical decision-making, key subgroups, cumulative disease burden, genetic evaluation, and psychosocial support. Stakeholders generated 6 proposed trials from these themes focused on surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical prevention.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nPatients and caregivers valued comparative effectiveness kidney stone research that focused on individualized care, shared decision-making, and improvement of patient-reported experiences. This process provided actionable recommendations for future patient-centered clinical trials within kidney stone disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"101097JU0000000000004242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Patient-Prioritized Research Agenda for Clinical Trials in Kidney Stone Disease.
PURPOSE
To ensure that research on kidney stones provides meaningful impact for the kidney stone community, patients and caregivers should be engaged as stakeholders in clinical trial design, starting at study inception. This project aimed to elicit, refine, and prioritize research ideas from kidney stone stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda for clinical trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The Kidney Stone Engagement Core, a group of patients, caregivers, advocates, clinicians, and researchers, executed an iterative process of surveys and focus groups to elicit and refine research themes, which were then translated into research questions. A separate group of patients, caregivers, and clinicians prioritized these questions through parallel modified Delphi and crowd-sourced digital platforms. A research agenda was developed by the Kidney Stone Engagement Core based on the highest rated questions during a hybrid virtual/in-person capstone session.
RESULTS
A total of 70 individuals (57 patients and caregivers, 13 researchers and clinicians) participated in the elicitation, 20 individuals (15 patients and caregivers, 5 researchers and clinicians) participated in refinement, and an additional 80 individuals (81 patients and caregivers, 9 researchers and clinicians) participated in prioritization. Key novel themes emerged from elicitation and refinement: ureteral stents, genetic evaluation, shared surgical decision-making, key subgroups, cumulative disease burden, genetic evaluation, and psychosocial support. Stakeholders generated 6 proposed trials from these themes focused on surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical prevention.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients and caregivers valued comparative effectiveness kidney stone research that focused on individualized care, shared decision-making, and improvement of patient-reported experiences. This process provided actionable recommendations for future patient-centered clinical trials within kidney stone disease.