文化是由什么构成的?关于围产期新生儿护理的伦理文化和护理人员观点的探索性研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2405-3336
Shannon Y Adams, Jessica T Fry, Natalia Henner
{"title":"文化是由什么构成的?关于围产期新生儿护理的伦理文化和护理人员观点的探索性研究。","authors":"Shannon Y Adams, Jessica T Fry, Natalia Henner","doi":"10.1055/a-2405-3336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Studies examining intercenter variation in neonatal intensive care unit practices at the limits of fetal viability have hypothesized that institutional \"culture\" can be one of many factors that impact patient care. This study aimed to describe institutional culture at a single, large academic center with regard to the antenatal consultation, resuscitation, and postnatal management of periviable neonates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Members of six clinical groups-attending and fellow maternal-fetal medicine physicians, attending and fellow neonatal-perinatal medicine physicians, neonatal nurses, advanced practiced neonatal nurses, pediatric hospitalist physicians, and neonatal respiratory therapists-were invited to complete qualitative, semi-structured interviews. All audio recordings were transcribed. Dedoose software was used to complete team-based coding and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Twenty-two interviews were completed. Thematic analysis revealed three central themes described by participants as contributory to institutional culture: <i>Perception</i>, referring to factors based on individual attitudes and insights, <i>Statements of Information</i>, referring to factors anchored in more objective concepts such as outcomes data and institutional policy, and <i>Dynamic Factors</i>, referring to the relatively fluid factors of institutional culture that interact with both <i>Perception</i> and <i>Statements of Information</i>. Participants were more likely to mention factors in the <i>Perception</i> category (<i>n</i> = 430) compared with factors in the <i>Information</i> category (<i>n</i> = 225), and although the latter were described as critical components of antenatal counseling and perinatal management, the philosophy of our unit appeared to be more heavily rooted in institutional memory and individual belief systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our data demonstrate a personal undertone to institutional culture at the limits of viability, with an emphasis on individual attitudes and subjective interpretations of fact rather than empirical data. As the landscape of neonatology continues to change, understanding those factors that contribute to culture remains a necessary step toward deconstructing institutional belief systems and optimizing clinical care.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Institutional culture is the collective norms and attitudes that help guide organizational behavior.. · Institutional culture may be one of many factors that impact the care of periviable neonates.. · Deconstructing culture helps us better understand our clinical environment and optimize patient care..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"502-510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is Culture Made of? An Exploratory Study of Ethical Cultures and Provider Perspectives on the Care of Periviable Neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Y Adams, Jessica T Fry, Natalia Henner\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2405-3336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Studies examining intercenter variation in neonatal intensive care unit practices at the limits of fetal viability have hypothesized that institutional \\\"culture\\\" can be one of many factors that impact patient care. This study aimed to describe institutional culture at a single, large academic center with regard to the antenatal consultation, resuscitation, and postnatal management of periviable neonates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Members of six clinical groups-attending and fellow maternal-fetal medicine physicians, attending and fellow neonatal-perinatal medicine physicians, neonatal nurses, advanced practiced neonatal nurses, pediatric hospitalist physicians, and neonatal respiratory therapists-were invited to complete qualitative, semi-structured interviews. All audio recordings were transcribed. Dedoose software was used to complete team-based coding and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Twenty-two interviews were completed. Thematic analysis revealed three central themes described by participants as contributory to institutional culture: <i>Perception</i>, referring to factors based on individual attitudes and insights, <i>Statements of Information</i>, referring to factors anchored in more objective concepts such as outcomes data and institutional policy, and <i>Dynamic Factors</i>, referring to the relatively fluid factors of institutional culture that interact with both <i>Perception</i> and <i>Statements of Information</i>. Participants were more likely to mention factors in the <i>Perception</i> category (<i>n</i> = 430) compared with factors in the <i>Information</i> category (<i>n</i> = 225), and although the latter were described as critical components of antenatal counseling and perinatal management, the philosophy of our unit appeared to be more heavily rooted in institutional memory and individual belief systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our data demonstrate a personal undertone to institutional culture at the limits of viability, with an emphasis on individual attitudes and subjective interpretations of fact rather than empirical data. As the landscape of neonatology continues to change, understanding those factors that contribute to culture remains a necessary step toward deconstructing institutional belief systems and optimizing clinical care.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Institutional culture is the collective norms and attitudes that help guide organizational behavior.. · Institutional culture may be one of many factors that impact the care of periviable neonates.. · Deconstructing culture helps us better understand our clinical environment and optimize patient care..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502-510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-3336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-3336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对胎儿存活极限时新生儿重症监护室的中心间实践差异进行的研究假设,机构 "文化 "可能是影响患者护理的众多因素之一。本研究旨在描述一个大型学术中心在围产期新生儿的产前咨询、复苏和产后管理方面的机构文化:研究设计:邀请六个临床小组的成员--母胎医学主治医师和研究员、新生儿围产医学主治医师和研究员、新生儿护士、新生儿高级执业护士、儿科住院医师和新生儿呼吸治疗师--完成半结构化定性访谈。所有录音均已转录。使用 Dedoose 软件完成团队编码和主题分析:共完成 22 次访谈。主题分析揭示了参与者所描述的三个有助于形成机构文化的中心主题:感知,指的是基于个人态度和见解的因素;信息声明,指的是基于更客观概念的因素,如结果数据和机构政策;动态因素,指的是与感知和信息声明相互作用的机构文化中相对不稳定的因素。尽管后者被描述为产前咨询和围产期管理的重要组成部分,但我们单位的理念似乎更多地是根植于机构记忆和个人信仰体系:我们的数据表明,在生命存活的极限阶段,机构文化中存在着个人色彩,强调的是个人态度和对事实的主观解释,而不是经验数据。随着新生儿学领域的不断变化,了解促成文化的因素仍是解构机构信仰体系和优化临床护理的必要步骤:- 机构文化是有助于指导组织行为的集体规范和态度。- 机构文化可能是影响围产期新生儿护理的众多因素之一。- 解构文化有助于我们更好地了解临床环境并优化患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Is Culture Made of? An Exploratory Study of Ethical Cultures and Provider Perspectives on the Care of Periviable Neonates.

Objective:  Studies examining intercenter variation in neonatal intensive care unit practices at the limits of fetal viability have hypothesized that institutional "culture" can be one of many factors that impact patient care. This study aimed to describe institutional culture at a single, large academic center with regard to the antenatal consultation, resuscitation, and postnatal management of periviable neonates.

Study design:  Members of six clinical groups-attending and fellow maternal-fetal medicine physicians, attending and fellow neonatal-perinatal medicine physicians, neonatal nurses, advanced practiced neonatal nurses, pediatric hospitalist physicians, and neonatal respiratory therapists-were invited to complete qualitative, semi-structured interviews. All audio recordings were transcribed. Dedoose software was used to complete team-based coding and thematic analysis.

Results:  Twenty-two interviews were completed. Thematic analysis revealed three central themes described by participants as contributory to institutional culture: Perception, referring to factors based on individual attitudes and insights, Statements of Information, referring to factors anchored in more objective concepts such as outcomes data and institutional policy, and Dynamic Factors, referring to the relatively fluid factors of institutional culture that interact with both Perception and Statements of Information. Participants were more likely to mention factors in the Perception category (n = 430) compared with factors in the Information category (n = 225), and although the latter were described as critical components of antenatal counseling and perinatal management, the philosophy of our unit appeared to be more heavily rooted in institutional memory and individual belief systems.

Conclusion:  Our data demonstrate a personal undertone to institutional culture at the limits of viability, with an emphasis on individual attitudes and subjective interpretations of fact rather than empirical data. As the landscape of neonatology continues to change, understanding those factors that contribute to culture remains a necessary step toward deconstructing institutional belief systems and optimizing clinical care.

Key points: · Institutional culture is the collective norms and attitudes that help guide organizational behavior.. · Institutional culture may be one of many factors that impact the care of periviable neonates.. · Deconstructing culture helps us better understand our clinical environment and optimize patient care..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Unintended Upper Uterine Wall Extensions at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: Risk Factors and Associated Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Cost Comparison of a Traditional Didactic versus National Flipped Classroom Curriculum. Implementation of a Standardized Protocol for Postpartum Anemia: A Prospective Cohort Study. Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Pregnancy and Delivery-Specific Considerations and Outcomes. Spontaneous Umbilical Cord Vascular Rupture during Labor: A Retrospective Analysis of 12 Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1