外科手术中的性别偏见:定性研究的系统回顾。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115974
Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Lincólin Bardini Goulart, Carolina Hack Alves, Carolina Polidori Aguiar, Luiza Bertolli Lucchese Moraes, Gabriela Rangel Brandão
{"title":"外科手术中的性别偏见:定性研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Lincólin Bardini Goulart, Carolina Hack Alves, Carolina Polidori Aguiar, Luiza Bertolli Lucchese Moraes, Gabriela Rangel Brandão","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of gender bias in the field of surgery, a systematic review was conducted to assess relevant perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and LILACS for qualitative studies on how students, trainees, and surgeons recognize gender aspects concerning surgery. Data was thematically synthesized according to Thomas and Harden's methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included, comprising 892 participants, between males and females. Twenty-four codes were generated, and two major themes were identified: gender bias and discrimination, and parenting. Bias were commonly implicit and associated with microaggressions. It involved discouragement, struggles with traditional gender norms, harassment, and lifestyle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We highlight the complexity of the barriers towards gender equality in surgery, addressing the lack of representativity and the persistence of bias. Understanding the obstacles and finding ways to overcome them can help to change the current situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender bias in surgery: A systematic review of qualitative studies.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Lincólin Bardini Goulart, Carolina Hack Alves, Carolina Polidori Aguiar, Luiza Bertolli Lucchese Moraes, Gabriela Rangel Brandão\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of gender bias in the field of surgery, a systematic review was conducted to assess relevant perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and LILACS for qualitative studies on how students, trainees, and surgeons recognize gender aspects concerning surgery. Data was thematically synthesized according to Thomas and Harden's methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included, comprising 892 participants, between males and females. Twenty-four codes were generated, and two major themes were identified: gender bias and discrimination, and parenting. Bias were commonly implicit and associated with microaggressions. It involved discouragement, struggles with traditional gender norms, harassment, and lifestyle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We highlight the complexity of the barriers towards gender equality in surgery, addressing the lack of representativity and the persistence of bias. Understanding the obstacles and finding ways to overcome them can help to change the current situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了全面了解外科领域的性别偏见,我们进行了一项系统性研究:为了全面了解外科领域的性别偏见,我们进行了一项系统性研究,以评估相关的看法:我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 LILACS 中搜索了有关学生、受训人员和外科医生如何认识外科手术中的性别问题的定性研究。根据托马斯和哈登的方法对数据进行了专题综合:结果:共收录了 18 篇文章,共有 892 名参与者,其中既有男性也有女性。共产生了 24 个代码,并确定了两大主题:性别偏见和歧视以及养育子女。偏见通常是隐性的,并与微小的诽谤有关。它涉及气馁、与传统性别规范的斗争、骚扰和生活方式:我们强调了外科手术中性别平等障碍的复杂性,解决了缺乏代表性和偏见持续存在的问题。了解这些障碍并找到克服它们的方法有助于改变当前的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender bias in surgery: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Background: In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of gender bias in the field of surgery, a systematic review was conducted to assess relevant perceptions.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and LILACS for qualitative studies on how students, trainees, and surgeons recognize gender aspects concerning surgery. Data was thematically synthesized according to Thomas and Harden's methodology.

Results: Eighteen articles were included, comprising 892 participants, between males and females. Twenty-four codes were generated, and two major themes were identified: gender bias and discrimination, and parenting. Bias were commonly implicit and associated with microaggressions. It involved discouragement, struggles with traditional gender norms, harassment, and lifestyle.

Conclusions: We highlight the complexity of the barriers towards gender equality in surgery, addressing the lack of representativity and the persistence of bias. Understanding the obstacles and finding ways to overcome them can help to change the current situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Family planning impact on medical students’ surgery interest and current policies in the United States: A scoping review Risk factors and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision Pass/fail and reducing the hidden curriculum for residency applicants. Re-operation following urgent and emergent colectomies: An investigation of indications and utility as a quality indicator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1